In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[boedicca]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

You're a loon if you think all women are the equivalent of Prostitutes and Porn Stars.

Go away.

 

[WinterBorn]

Capital based morals work under capitalism.

Social based morals should always be free.

Social based morals or capital based morals, the woman still gets to choose who she fucks. Unless she is attracted to you, you’ll have to pay cash.

out of all of them, none of them for free?

You refuse to try to be attractive. That means you pay. Otherwise, you have to play their game.

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

 

[danielpalos]

I already know, women can't be serious if they can't make an appointment. I don't have, lousy male intuition, for free. My low numbers and lack of actual practice, prove it.

Plenty of women can make an appointment. They simply don’t choose to make one with you. They are obviously serious about choosing their partners for themselves.

Your low numbers and lack of practice only prove that YOU are not chosen by women.

I am the one who puts out really really serious relationships, just like that. In my case, if they aren't playing My game, they cannot be really really serous about a really really serious relationship, with me.

Why should I bother, with women, I already know can't be very serious if they are merely playing Their games and not My games.

So they have to play YOUR game? Why should they? To win the prize of an unemployed, inexperienced guy who does not care what they want? Lol. No wonder.

is it about a really really serious relationship for free, or about capitalism?

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

 

[danielpalos]

Capital based morals work under capitalism.

Social based morals should always be free.

Social based morals or capital based morals, the woman still gets to choose who she fucks. Unless she is attracted to you, you’ll have to pay cash.

out of all of them, none of them for free?

You refuse to try to be attractive. That means you pay. Otherwise, you have to play their game.

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

 

[WinterBorn]

Plenty of women can make an appointment. They simply don’t choose to make one with you. They are obviously serious about choosing their partners for themselves.

Your low numbers and lack of practice only prove that YOU are not chosen by women.

I am the one who puts out really really serious relationships, just like that. In my case, if they aren't playing My game, they cannot be really really serous about a really really serious relationship, with me.

Why should I bother, with women, I already know can't be very serious if they are merely playing Their games and not My games.

So they have to play YOUR game? Why should they? To win the prize of an unemployed, inexperienced guy who does not care what they want? Lol. No wonder.

is it about a really really serious relationship for free, or about capitalism?

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

 

[WinterBorn]

Social based morals or capital based morals, the woman still gets to choose who she fucks. Unless she is attracted to you, you’ll have to pay cash.

out of all of them, none of them for free?

You refuse to try to be attractive. That means you pay. Otherwise, you have to play their game.

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

 

[danielpalos]

I am the one who puts out really really serious relationships, just like that. In my case, if they aren't playing My game, they cannot be really really serous about a really really serious relationship, with me.

Why should I bother, with women, I already know can't be very serious if they are merely playing Their games and not My games.

So they have to play YOUR game? Why should they? To win the prize of an unemployed, inexperienced guy who does not care what they want? Lol. No wonder.

is it about a really really serious relationship for free, or about capitalism?

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

how serious can it be i have to lie for poon?

 

[danielpalos]

out of all of them, none of them for free?

You refuse to try to be attractive. That means you pay. Otherwise, you have to play their game.

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

 

[WinterBorn]

So they have to play YOUR game? Why should they? To win the prize of an unemployed, inexperienced guy who does not care what they want? Lol. No wonder.

is it about a really really serious relationship for free, or about capitalism?

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

how serious can it be i have to lie for poon?

I never said you had to lie. I just pointed out that unless the woman is attracted to you, your hope of getting in a serious relationship is nil.

 

[WinterBorn]

You refuse to try to be attractive. That means you pay. Otherwise, you have to play their game.

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

 

[Toro]

In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

I'm talking about the time from the 50s, is there? Normal women, the ones who you see and interact with in your normal day-to-day activities, have brought down men to a state, where men are respectful of women's sexual liberty, etc. Normal women have more than one sexual partner, whether you like it or not, they engage in these sexual relations for something in return, how is that different than prostitution? They also have their clips and pics taken in nude and while performing sexual activities with their previous sexual partners(which no doubt would be many), and these circulate among a group of people, or eventually find their way onto the Internet, so how does this make them any different than pornstars?

All this situation panders to only women's passive sexuality. Things were worse for men from the beginning, men never had any upper hand, from that time, if a woman were to want to have sex, all they had to do was put it out, and hundreds of men would line up to have sex with her, but similar situation didn't and doesn't exist for men, if a man were to want to have sex, he has to buy it or jump through hundreds of hoops.

Isn't this a very wicked, evil and cruel situation?

Damn, how did I miss this awesome thread!

I wish normal women acted like this.

 

[danielpalos]

is it about a really really serious relationship for free, or about capitalism?

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

how serious can it be i have to lie for poon?

I never said you had to lie. I just pointed out that unless the woman is attracted to you, your hope of getting in a serious relationship is nil.

women are always more attracted to me when i have an income.

 

[danielpalos]

I am not the one claiming I can't handle uncommitted sex and need a really really serious relationship.

All it takes is money, not telling stories or being a liar, for poon.

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

 

[danielpalos]

Like Jesus the Christ said, why bother with true love for free, when you can always go to the nearest money changer and buy capital love for a market friendly price.

 

[WinterBorn]

It is about a serious relationship, if that is what you both want. But no one will go into a serious relationship with someone they do not find attractive. That is the simple, unavoidable truth.

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

how serious can it be i have to lie for poon?

I never said you had to lie. I just pointed out that unless the woman is attracted to you, your hope of getting in a serious relationship is nil.

women are always more attracted to me when i have an income.

So get a job.

 

[WinterBorn]

I don't know anyone who is saying they can't handle uncommitted sex. I'm also not telling stories or lies (as you have done) for poon.

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

 

[danielpalos]

not for free. capitalism, works.

If you have to pay her, it is not a serious relationship. But then again, if you are unemployed she will likely not be interested in a serious relationship. But that is not about money as much as it is about wanting a relationship with a grown man capable of carrying his own weight.

how serious can it be i have to lie for poon?

I never said you had to lie. I just pointed out that unless the woman is attracted to you, your hope of getting in a serious relationship is nil.

women are always more attracted to me when i have an income.

So get a job.

i don't need them for free when I have money.

 

[danielpalos]

if women can handle uncommitted sex, then whence any problems asking for a full body massage with happy ending?

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

 

[WinterBorn]

Once again, it comes down to whether or not they are attracted to you. If not, the free massage holds no interest for them.

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

 

[danielpalos]

that is why i don't take women seriously for free when i have no money.

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.