In present times, is there a difference between a prostitute, pornstar and a normal woman?

[WinterBorn]

Whether you take them seriously or not is not relevant. What IS relevant is that unless she is attracted to you, you are not getting laid or getting into a serious relationship.

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

 

[danielpalos]

it only takes money, being a guy; not alleged, true love for free.

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

 

[WinterBorn]

How do you know what it takes, Mr Low Numbers?

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

 

[danielpalos]

An understanding of economics.

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

 

[WinterBorn]

And a complete lack of understanding of women. Next time you meet a girl, offer to pay her for sex. Just out of the blue. And let me know how that works out.

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. Why would I do that? I don't mind practicing full body massage.

besides, if she believed in equality, she would have no problem with me asking if she wants to fuck, just for fun and practice.

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

 

[WinterBorn]

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

I understand economics far better than you understand interpersonal relationships.

 

[WinterBorn]

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

Right on cue.

 

[danielpalos]

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

Right on cue.

I am always right, and You are always wrong; that is mystory.

 

[WinterBorn]

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

Right on cue.

I am always right, and You are always wrong; that is mystory.

If you ignore facts, you might have a case.

But insisting that individual women can be treated the same as large economic models......well......not so much.

 

[WinterBorn]

I know plenty of women who do not mind that direct approach. Just as long as you have no problem with her saying ‘No’.

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

Right on cue.

I am always right, and You are always wrong; that is mystory.

If you ignore facts, you might have a case.

But insisting that individual women can be treated the same as large economic models......well......not so much.

You are the only one claiming that, story teller.

 

[danielpalos]

Why should it be a problem, under normal market conditions?

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

 

[WinterBorn]

I understand economics quite well. I also understand that people are not the same. Given the same parameters, most economic models will work as expected. Given the same parameters and stimuli, different people will react in wildly different ways.

And if you are treating women like economic models, it would explain your low number. But if you open your mouth and try to tell them how economic models control their behavior, it is a wonder you are not a virgin.


Now, revert back to your "story teller" diversions to avoid staying on topic.

You don't argue; you merely make up, YourStory not true history.

Right on cue.

I am always right, and You are always wrong; that is mystory.

If you ignore facts, you might have a case.

But insisting that individual women can be treated the same as large economic models......well......not so much.

You are the only one claiming that, story teller.

On cue again.

 

[WinterBorn]

Interpersonal relationships are not "market conditions".

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

 

[danielpalos]

lol. you simply don't understand economics.

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

 

[WinterBorn]

I understand economics quite well.

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

 

[danielpalos]

No, you don't.

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

 

[WinterBorn]

What you do not understand is that the economics models you espouse are based on large populations, not individuals.

Talk to an economist and ask them if the models apply to any given individual. They will tell you that they do not.

telling stories is all you know how to do.

Just facts. But I see your prefererence for fallacies instead of discussion is consistent.

you have no facts, only Yourstories not Mystories.

So you are insisting that economic theories aimed at large populations will apply to individuals? And please answer the actual question I asked.

lol. the laws of demand and supply don't cease to exist, for right wing fantasy.

So your answer to my question is ‘Yes’?