In Sign of Warming, 1,600 Years of Ice in Andes Melted in 25 Years

[SSDD]

Looks like you who is whimpering....or are you claiming that those 6000 year old plants being exposed were growing in ice?....and are you claiming that the solar output at the end of the 30th century wasn't at its highest in over 11,000 years....and are you claiming that if you look at the entire vostok ice core record, the instances of CO2 laging behind temperature increases are far more prevalant?

Which one of those realities are you denying in favor of the output of computer models.

As the hoax dies...and it is surely dying....we are seeing who the real deniers are.

 

[IanC]

the same fellow who has done the Andes cores did one in Alaska back in the early 2000s. because it didnt produce the 'right' results, it never saw the light of day. it only dated back to the RWP. glaciers are a function of local conditions as much as temperature.

the part of CAGW that I dont get is why the warmers scream 'look at the melting glaciers, it must be CO2', when glaciers have been receding since the 1800s.

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

 

[Old Rocks]

USGS Repeat Photography Project Documents Retreating Glaciers in Glacier National Park | Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center (NOROCK)

USGS Professional Paper 1386-F: Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World -- Asia

This chapter is the ninth to be released in U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1386, Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World, a series of 11 chapters. In each of the geographic area chapters, remotely sensed images, primarily from the Landsat 1, 2, and 3 series of spacecraft, are used to analyze the specific glacierized region of our planet under consideration and to monitor glacier changes. Landsat images, acquired primarily during the middle to late 1970s and early 1980s, were used by an international team of glaciologists and other scientists to study various geographic regions and (or) to discuss related glaciological topics. In each glacierized geographic region, the present areal distribution of glaciers is compared, wherever possible, with historical information about their past extent. The atlas provides an accurate regional inventory of the areal extent of glacier ice on our planet during the 1970s as part of a growing international scientific effort to measure global environmental change on the Earth’s surface.

This is what is really happening. Real scientists doing real science.

 

[whitehall]

We didn't freaking do it. If Al Gore gets rich selling mythical carbon credits it ain't gonna affect the climate one bit. If we shift America's wealth to a foreign extortion racket it ain't gonna affect the climate. If the radical lefties come to their senses and stop whining about the nice weather maybe we can fix the economy.

 

[RollingThunder]

We didn't freaking do it. If Al Gore gets rich selling mythical carbon credits it ain't gonna affect the climate one bit. If we shift America's wealth to a foreign extortion racket it ain't gonna affect the climate. If the radical lefties come to their senses and stop whining about the nice weather maybe we can fix the economy.

Regurgitating your pathetic denier cult myths won't make them real.

Mankind has caused atmospheric levels of a powerful greenhouse gas to increase by 40% so far (and still rising) and this has caused global temperatures to rise and climate patterns to change so there is no evading responsibility on this.

We DID "freaking do it", you clueless moron.

 

[gslack]

Yes, yes a TROPICAL GLACIER, is melting... Be afraid! LOL, tropical... As in the tropics... You know where it's warm,most of the time...Yeah...

Forgive me guys but I'm gonna hold off on the panic just yet... ROFL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

I'll take AGW seriously as soon as the AGW Cult stops posting about it

 

[westwall]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Yes....and 80% of the melting had occurred before 1900. Funny how you all ignore that little fact. All of it LOOOOOONG before CO2 was at "dangerous" levels.

 

[westwall]

We didn't freaking do it. If Al Gore gets rich selling mythical carbon credits it ain't gonna affect the climate one bit. If we shift America's wealth to a foreign extortion racket it ain't gonna affect the climate. If the radical lefties come to their senses and stop whining about the nice weather maybe we can fix the economy.

Regurgitating your pathetic denier cult myths won't make them real.

Mankind has caused atmospheric levels of a powerful greenhouse gas to increase by 40% so far (and still rising) and this has caused global temperatures to rise and climate patterns to change so there is no evading responsibility on this.

We DID "freaking do it", you clueless moron.

Ohhhhh, poor blunder....your pathetic denier cult myths are being exposed as the frauds they are and you have to throw a little tantrum.

Sucks to be you old buddy!

 

[RollingThunder]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Yes....and 80% of the melting had occurred before 1900. Funny how you all ignore that little fact. All of it LOOOOOONG before CO2 was at "dangerous" levels.

LOLOLOLOL.....ROTFLMAO......you really are quite insane, y'know.....ice is sensitive to temperatures....

 

[gslack]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Yes....and 80% of the melting had occurred before 1900. Funny how you all ignore that little fact. All of it LOOOOOONG before CO2 was at "dangerous" levels.

LOLOLOLOL.....ROTFLMAO......you really are quite insane, y'know.....ice is sensitive to temperatures....

Oh nice another chart... And can you point to the part that applies to their exchange?

 

[SSDD]

Which altered data set does this chart represent?

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Yes....and 80% of the melting had occurred before 1900. Funny how you all ignore that little fact. All of it LOOOOOONG before CO2 was at "dangerous" levels.

Flap yap, and no truth in it.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F1_Russia.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F2_China.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F3_Afghanistan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F4_Pakistan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F5_India.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F6_Nepal.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F7_Bhutan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F8_PaleoRecord.pdf

Research from real scientists, not internet pretenders.

 

[westwall]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Yes....and 80% of the melting had occurred before 1900. Funny how you all ignore that little fact. All of it LOOOOOONG before CO2 was at "dangerous" levels.

Flap yap, and no truth in it.

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F1_Russia.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F2_China.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F3_Afghanistan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F4_Pakistan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F5_India.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F6_Nepal.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F7_Bhutan.pdf

http://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/p1386f/pdf/F8_PaleoRecord.pdf

Research from real scientists, not internet pretenders.

Your material is a little dated there olfraud....one paper's most RECENT source material was 1998!

Amazingly enough the world changes over time...unlike you...you're mired in the past like the dinosaurs you're about to join.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

What a dumb, meaningless statement. But then, you do need some excuse to ignore the evidence.

Sea levels have been slowly rising since the end of the little ice age, as the glaciers that expanded during the little ice age slowly retreated over the following centuries. But what we're seeing now is something different, a fast retreat of most glaciers and accelerating sea level rise. And that's due to the ongoing rise in temperatures. Denialists insanely keep trying to deny temps are rising, but they're looking ever kookier with that claim.

Okay, only half of them deny temps are rising. The other half says the world is warming, but it's a natural cycle. Actually, the same people flipflop between "no warming!" and "warming is natural!" from post to post. You'd think they'd try to come up with one consistent story and stick with it, being it would make them appear less ridiculous.

"LOLz! You tell 'em!!"

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Really? The .000002ppm CO2 released in 1805 made the Thames freeze over?

 

[RollingThunder]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Really? The .000002ppm CO2 released in 1805 made the Thames freeze over?

Another insane response from the CrazyFruitcake. As usual.

 

[westwall]

LOL. Because the warming started in the 1800's.

Really? The .000002ppm CO2 released in 1805 made the Thames freeze over?

Another insane response from the CrazyFruitcake. As usual.

Far more relevent than the propaganda you post. Get used to it......you're going to be extinct in a short while....shorter than even I though possible. All you flat earthers can commiserate amongst yourselves about how the dummies won.......yet again!

I guess that makes you the dummy eh?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Which altered data set does this chart represent?

Notice the "Warming" in the 1800's per Old Rocks?