Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why would Trump give them anything?You forget what Trump himself admits
The rest is from not only those who heard, but participated in subsequent meetings
Trumps people even admitted there was a quid pro quo
Okay, tell me who outside of Sondland, who was the only real person to speak to Trump directly, said there was a quid pro quo by Trump. Sondland testified that he too wasn't sure what Trump wanted, so when he called Trump directly, Trump stated he wanted nothing from Zelensky. He wanted no quid pro quo. He only wanted Zelensky to do the right thing.
Now......even if you could prove that, then explain how every other President before Trump used quid pro quo's, but it's impeachable offense if Trump "tried" the same? Remember: no thought police excuses like Trump knew Biden would be his opponent, or that Democrats can read minds to know what Trump was thinking. Solid evidence is what I want to see here.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
You forget what Trump himself admits
The rest is from not only those who heard, but participated in subsequent meetings
Trumps people even admitted there was a quid pro quo
Okay, tell me who outside of Sondland, who was the only real person to speak to Trump directly, said there was a quid pro quo by Trump. Sondland testified that he too wasn't sure what Trump wanted, so when he called Trump directly, Trump stated he wanted nothing from Zelensky. He wanted no quid pro quo. He only wanted Zelensky to do the right thing.
Now......even if you could prove that, then explain how every other President before Trump used quid pro quo's, but it's impeachable offense if Trump "tried" the same? Remember: no thought police excuses like Trump knew Biden would be his opponent, or that Democrats can read minds to know what Trump was thinking. Solid evidence is what I want to see here.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
Ingraham: A first lady double standard?
The only acceptable woman in the media landscape is a liberal one and if you are not, you're just too dumb to know the difference.
ME: Of course there is a double standard, on this matter as on all others too. If Melania were a democrat, speaking 5 languages and being a beautiful model, she would be on every magazine and ever tv show every day.
Speaking 5 languages?
Can you prove with a video where she speaks French, German or Italian....go. She also lied about her college degree.
According to CNN you are wrong, which doesn’t surprise me.
Melania Trump Fast Facts - CNN
Seems you are intimidated by strong women.
As First Lady, Melania travels the world and has had ample opportunity to demonstrate her mastery of languages. Yet, the only video of her speaking in French and Italian shows a rudimentary skill
Hello, my name is Melania, what is your name?
Then, back to English
Who cares? She's not trying to take over healthcare like Hillary did as First Lady, nor is she trying to take over what kids eat at lunch, like Michelle did. Sounds to me like you're just trying to find things about her to criticize.
LOLYou forget what Trump himself admits
The rest is from not only those who heard, but participated in subsequent meetings
Trumps people even admitted there was a quid pro quo
Okay, tell me who outside of Sondland, who was the only real person to speak to Trump directly, said there was a quid pro quo by Trump. Sondland testified that he too wasn't sure what Trump wanted, so when he called Trump directly, Trump stated he wanted nothing from Zelensky. He wanted no quid pro quo. He only wanted Zelensky to do the right thing.
Now......even if you could prove that, then explain how every other President before Trump used quid pro quo's, but it's impeachable offense if Trump "tried" the same? Remember: no thought police excuses like Trump knew Biden would be his opponent, or that Democrats can read minds to know what Trump was thinking. Solid evidence is what I want to see here.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
LOLOkay, tell me who outside of Sondland, who was the only real person to speak to Trump directly, said there was a quid pro quo by Trump. Sondland testified that he too wasn't sure what Trump wanted, so when he called Trump directly, Trump stated he wanted nothing from Zelensky. He wanted no quid pro quo. He only wanted Zelensky to do the right thing.
Now......even if you could prove that, then explain how every other President before Trump used quid pro quo's, but it's impeachable offense if Trump "tried" the same? Remember: no thought police excuses like Trump knew Biden would be his opponent, or that Democrats can read minds to know what Trump was thinking. Solid evidence is what I want to see here.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
If full documentation exonerates him, why would he hide it and demand key aids do not cooperate?
Ingraham: A first lady double standard?
The only acceptable woman in the media landscape is a liberal one and if you are not, you're just too dumb to know the difference.
ME: Of course there is a double standard, on this matter as on all others too. If Melania were a democrat, speaking 5 languages and being a beautiful model, she would be on every magazine and ever tv show every day.
She is not on magazine covers, because she does not want to be on magazine covers. She steers clear of the public eye, for the most part. That's what shame does to a person.
Or, more likely, she's had her fill of the spotlight, knows what it's like to be in magazines and simply doesn't care what you think. Shocking, I know.
What about my comments imply she cares what I think? Your response is bizarre. Look at what trump has done to your brain.
That you ASSume she avoids the spotlight because of shame. I mean, because you know her so well and all. And since when do you believe that Trump has mind-altering powers? Your X15KZ foil helmet is on too tight.
Forget trying to avoid the spot light...
Why do you think she avoids living in the same building as her husband???
Okay, tell me who outside of Sondland, who was the only real person to speak to Trump directly, said there was a quid pro quo by Trump. Sondland testified that he too wasn't sure what Trump wanted, so when he called Trump directly, Trump stated he wanted nothing from Zelensky. He wanted no quid pro quo. He only wanted Zelensky to do the right thing.
Now......even if you could prove that, then explain how every other President before Trump used quid pro quo's, but it's impeachable offense if Trump "tried" the same? Remember: no thought police excuses like Trump knew Biden would be his opponent, or that Democrats can read minds to know what Trump was thinking. Solid evidence is what I want to see here.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
nope. he released a memorandum of the transcript. the full, unedited transcript is in a secure vault up in the cloud.
donny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
nope. he released a memorandum of the transcript. the full, unedited transcript is in a secure vault up in the cloud.
It was redacted. That's the only transcript.
If Trump had evidence to exonerate himself, he would present it. Instead he refuses to participate or allow his staff to participate.LOLdonny won't allow the first person witness' to testify under oath & sondland himself admitted that all the docs proving one way or the other are being held by the SOS.
criminal law 101: don't withhold evidence that can prove your innocence.
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
If full documentation exonerates him, why would he hide it and demand key aids do not cooperate?
Because they are not looking for anything to exonerate him. No matter what they find, they're going to carry out this farce regardless. It can't benefit Trump no matter what is or is not in the documents. All they are doing is looking for something.....anything to make their case for impeachment because the charges they have now are nothing but lies.
Mrs obama was a political activistAnyone called her "Moolania" or photoshopped a dick knto her yet?
No?
Then shut the fuck up.
You have it backwardsIf Trump had evidence to exonerate himself, he would present it. Instead he refuses to participate or allow his staff to participate.LOLYou know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
If full documentation exonerates him, why would he hide it and demand key aids do not cooperate?
Because they are not looking for anything to exonerate him. No matter what they find, they're going to carry out this farce regardless. It can't benefit Trump no matter what is or is not in the documents. All they are doing is looking for something.....anything to make their case for impeachment because the charges they have now are nothing but lies.
Like a true Mafia Don
So this jacket was just a fashion faux pass?Mrs obama was a political activistAnyone called her "Moolania" or photoshopped a dick knto her yet?
No?
Then shut the fuck up.
Melania is not
You have it backwardsIf Trump had evidence to exonerate himself, he would present it. Instead he refuses to participate or allow his staff to participate.LOLhaaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
If full documentation exonerates him, why would he hide it and demand key aids do not cooperate?
Because they are not looking for anything to exonerate him. No matter what they find, they're going to carry out this farce regardless. It can't benefit Trump no matter what is or is not in the documents. All they are doing is looking for something.....anything to make their case for impeachment because the charges they have now are nothing but lies.
Like a true Mafia Don
Democrats have to prove trump is guilty
And they have failed go do so
You know that how? You have no idea what any documents he has says. Trump is not going to accommodate a witch hunt. They don't know what's in those documents either. They don't know WTF they are looking for. But since this impeachment was a farce from the beginning, they are looking for a real reason to impeach him to avoid the political ramifications.
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
nope. he released a memorandum of the transcript. the full, unedited transcript is in a secure vault up in the cloud.
It was redacted. That's the only transcript.
wrong ray ray. the MEM-OR-AN-DUM was released without redactions, but it contained ellipses. you do know what they are, don't you? that means '...beginning of the sentences or the ....' has been omitted.
CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear. Classified By: 2354726 Derived.From: NSC SCG Declassify On: 20441231 -lJNCLASSIFIED
^^^ PAGE ONE of the MEMORANDUM trump released.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
will you try 'n lie that the link i just provided is NOT the official white house site & that it's also behind a paywall too?
Ingraham: A first lady double standard?
The only acceptable woman in the media landscape is a liberal one and if you are not, you're just too dumb to know the difference.
ME: Of course there is a double standard, on this matter as on all others too. If Melania were a democrat, speaking 5 languages and being a beautiful model, she would be on every magazine and ever tv show every day.
Speaking 5 languages?
Can you prove with a video where she speaks French, German or Italian....go. She also lied about her college degree.
According to CNN you are wrong, which doesn’t surprise me.
Melania Trump Fast Facts - CNN
Seems you are intimidated by strong women.
As First Lady, Melania travels the world and has had ample opportunity to demonstrate her mastery of languages. Yet, the only video of her speaking in French and Italian shows a rudimentary skill
Hello, my name is Melania, what is your name?
Then, back to English
Who cares? She's not trying to take over healthcare like Hillary did as First Lady, nor is she trying to take over what kids eat at lunch, like Michelle did. Sounds to me like you're just trying to find things about her to criticize.
Imagine First Ladies who actually take on serious issues?
Be Best? LOL
haaaaaaaaaa................ what? SONDLAND testified UNDER OATH that the SOS was with holding relevant materials. you don't think that if donny were able to have his people exhonerate him, he wouldn't have had a red carpet event with searchlights 'n everything - hollywood style? are you kidding?
nice try raymond - but your logic is the farce.
Why would Trump give them anything if it's not going to make a difference? Trump released the phone call transcript, and they simply lied about what it said and started this impeachment nonsense. The transcript clearly exonerated him. But you can't give enough proof to Nazi's. They have their mind set on trying to get rid of this administration so their past crimes are not discovered by Barr and Durham.
nope. he released a memorandum of the transcript. the full, unedited transcript is in a secure vault up in the cloud.
It was redacted. That's the only transcript.
wrong ray ray. the MEM-OR-AN-DUM was released without redactions, but it contained ellipses. you do know what they are, don't you? that means '...beginning of the sentences or the ....' has been omitted.
CAUTION: A Memorandum of a Telephone Conversation.· (TELCON) is not a verbatim transcript of a discussion. The text in this document records the notes and recollections of Situation Room Duty "Officers and-NSC policy staff assigned t_o listen.and memorialize the conversation in written form as the conversation takes place. A numper of factors can affect 'the accuracy of the reco�d, including poor telecommunications connections and variations in accent and/or interpretation. The word "inaudible" is used to indifate portions of a conversation that the notetaker was unable to hear. Classified By: 2354726 Derived.From: NSC SCG Declassify On: 20441231 -lJNCLASSIFIED
^^^ PAGE ONE of the MEMORANDUM trump released.
https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/Unclassified09.2019.pdf
will you try 'n lie that the link i just provided is NOT the official white house site & that it's also behind a paywall too?
Sao what's this supposed to prove? Conversations are not recorded. They stopped doing that after the Nixon administration. Now all transcripts are done by a stenographer. There is no other copy.
Who cares? Better question, why do you? I really think your irrational hatred is not helping you at all.So this jacket was just a fashion faux pass?Mrs obama was a political activistAnyone called her "Moolania" or photoshopped a dick knto her yet?
No?
Then shut the fuck up.
Melania is not
View attachment 293954
Wanting schoolchildren to eat healthy meals is political activism?Mrs obama was a political activistAnyone called her "Moolania" or photoshopped a dick knto her yet?
No?
Then shut the fuck up.
Melania is not
uh.......nope!!!!! the irony of your response is duly noted.You are confused and jumped into a different discussion. Put up the crack pipe.Hahaha hahaha, what evidence? I asked you for it. You failed* aside from the evidence I clearly stated, and to which you (as usual) are too limited in your mental tools to respond directly.Without evidence,
