AsianTrumpSupporter
Platinum Member
I think we should raise taxes on actors/actresses, directors, rappers, and music/movie producers to 90%.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
A tax cut is the people's money, not the governments.JCT: Middle class gets quarter of individual tax cuts in GOP tax bill ...
Want to venture a guess as to WHO got 3/4 of the borrowed money???
That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
Think how many people make a living doing the services for the rich.That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
A tax cut is the people's money, not the governments.
That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
Think how many people make a living doing the services for the rich.What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
Jealous? What you're exhibiting is called "envy", which is also a form of greed.
That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
Jealous? What you're exhibiting is called "envy", which is also a form of greed.
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
get a fucking brain transplant......No one stated that moronic "conclusion".....
WHY would a conglomerate want to repatriate those billions????
Go on..list the practical reasons why a CEO and Board would want to do that....???What are the advantages?
Before you make an idiot of yourself, try, TRY to "think"......
Think how many people make a living doing the services for the rich.I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
Jealous? What you're exhibiting is called "envy", which is also a form of greed.
What they are calculating is that the tax cut will not stimulate the economy and it will extend beyond 2012. If it does stimulate the economy (as many think it will) then there is no cost and perhaps even a profit to be made from the tax cut.
I bet it won't. What is going to stimulate the economy is the deregulations, which is where the businesses do whatever they want.. and it will not trickle down.
As Trump pointed out, there are trillions of dollars overseas because multinational companies can't bring it here due to taxation. Only the left would find a problem with new money flowing into the country.
But even if the money doesn't go directly to employees, that money will go somewhere to benefit the country. It may go into business expansion, investments, and yes, it could go to benefit workers.
Yet what happened when Bush Jr gave them a tax holiday. I am sorry, I find the rich make me ill, they have to be full of greed when millionaires and billionaires need more money to keep up their yachts and multiple mansions and fly around the world for lunch, and most of them get rich due to tax evasion and money laundering.
Jealous? What you're exhibiting is called "envy", which is also a form of greed.
The above idiot "thinks" he another Freud.......(what an LOL)
Yeah he’s doing a lot of things alright. Letting polluters rewrite EPA policies, removing Wall St. regulations that were put in place to prevent another financial meltdown, giving hunters permission to shoot hibernating bears and their cubs, weakening consumer protections..Yeah it is sickening and we saw this before. Obama comes quickly to mind.
Except Obama couldn't back up his talk with substantive action. Trump is actually doing things.
Yes he’s been a busy guy screwing the United States in between his 10 hours of TV watching per day.
ormasrosa was paid y
low paying government jobs? ormasrosa was paid 180 k a year and no one knew what she did....so you can dro that low paying bs....o yea people are making a fortune on disability
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
get a fucking brain transplant......No one stated that moronic "conclusion".....
WHY would a conglomerate want to repatriate those billions????
Go on..list the practical reasons why a CEO and Board would want to do that....???What are the advantages?
Before you make an idiot of yourself, try, TRY to "think"......
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
get a fucking brain transplant......No one stated that moronic "conclusion".....
WHY would a conglomerate want to repatriate those billions????
Go on..list the practical reasons why a CEO and Board would want to do that....???What are the advantages?
Before you make an idiot of yourself, try, TRY to "think"......
How about when GM ran into trouble in the US? They could have sent money from overseas to help themselves out here, but instead, we used US tax dollars to bail them out.
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
get a fucking brain transplant......No one stated that moronic "conclusion".....
WHY would a conglomerate want to repatriate those billions????
Go on..list the practical reasons why a CEO and Board would want to do that....???What are the advantages?
Before you make an idiot of yourself, try, TRY to "think"......
How about when GM ran into trouble in the US? They could have sent money from overseas to help themselves out here, but instead, we used US tax dollars to bail them out.
You mean Obama's GM bailout? My wife and I made the mistake of buying a new Obama-era GM bailout Chevy Sonic in 2013. It had a couple minor issues that were covered by the warranty but after the warranty expired, it started going to crap pretty quickly. The AC line developed a coolant leak, that cost $350. Then the oil breather which was built into the valve cover started leaking. They had to replace the whole valve cover, and it cost almost $500. Then a left rear window switch went out: $250. Thne the radiator coolant reserve tank started leaking:$120.
Then at 120,000 miles, the engine developed a tapping valve lifter. That wouldn't have been so bad but the motor had a knock sensor and would delay the ignition when it detected the tapping. That made it hard to get up hills and the gas mileage dropped from 38 mpg down to 19 mpg. It would have cost a couple grand to have it fixed so we traded it in on a new Nissan.
Never ever again, will I own another GM product. Ever.
Leftists don't like money being repatriated back into the US because that money belongs to the evil 1% who don't pay "their fair share".
get a fucking brain transplant......No one stated that moronic "conclusion".....
WHY would a conglomerate want to repatriate those billions????
Go on..list the practical reasons why a CEO and Board would want to do that....???What are the advantages?
Before you make an idiot of yourself, try, TRY to "think"......
How about when GM ran into trouble in the US? They could have sent money from overseas to help themselves out here, but instead, we used US tax dollars to bail them out.
You mean Obama's GM bailout? My wife and I made the mistake of buying a new Obama-era GM bailout Chevy Sonic in 2013. It had a couple minor issues that were covered by the warranty but after the warranty expired, it started going to crap pretty quickly. The AC line developed a coolant leak, that cost $350. Then the oil breather which was built into the valve cover started leaking. They had to replace the whole valve cover, and it cost almost $500. Then a left rear window switch went out: $250. Thne the radiator coolant reserve tank started leaking:$120.
Then at 120,000 miles, the engine developed a tapping valve lifter. That wouldn't have been so bad but the motor had a knock sensor and would delay the ignition when it detected the tapping. That made it hard to get up hills and the gas mileage dropped from 38 mpg down to 19 mpg. It would have cost a couple grand to have it fixed so we traded it in on a new Nissan.
Never ever again, will I own another GM product. Ever.
I had the same experience with a Chevy years ago. After 30,000 miles (when the warranty expired) my mechanic drove it more than I did.
So I switched to Toyota. I've never been late to work because my car wouldn't start, never seen a tow truck, and the only time I was ever stranded is when the battery went, but that was my fault because you never let a car battery go beyond 4 years.
I've had two Camry's since then and couldn't be more satisfied. Those cars came with a 100,000 mile or seven year bumper to bumper warranty which is something American vehicles can't offer. One of the first things I noticed is that they put the washer fluid squirters in the hood of the vehicle instead of those rubber tubing lines that went up the windshield wiper arm. Those squirters on the tube lines often froze in the winter and you had to get hot water to thaw them out. With the squirters in the hood, the engine heat keeps them dry and from freezing later on. Just better engineering.
Since Prez Obama. He did NONE of those things.Yes there is some truth there, but since when have we not had to endure a fuck up as POTUS?Yeah he’s doing a lot of things alright. Letting polluters rewrite EPA policies, removing Wall St. regulations that were put in place to prevent another financial meltdown, giving hunters permission to shoot hibernating bears and their cubs, weakening consumer protections..Yeah it is sickening and we saw this before. Obama comes quickly to mind.
Except Obama couldn't back up his talk with substantive action. Trump is actually doing things.
Yes he’s been a busy guy screwing the United States in between his 10 hours of TV watching per day.
Who are they? Non partisan independent sources like the CBO. The ones you ignore to favor partisan in the tank for Trump sources.A tax cut is the people's money, not the governments.What kind of sick person hopes that people won't save money on their taxes? Geez, mang.
JCT: Middle class gets quarter of individual tax cuts in GOP tax bill ...
Want to venture a guess as to WHO got 3/4 of the borrowed money???
That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
They have already said that 83 or 86% of the cuts will go to the 1%.
Who are "they"? Are "they" the same people who are being referred to when someone says "Anonymous sources say..." or "Most people say..."?
Who are they? Non partisan independent sources like the CBO. The ones you ignore to favor partisan in the tank for Trump sources.A tax cut is the people's money, not the governments.JCT: Middle class gets quarter of individual tax cuts in GOP tax bill ...
Want to venture a guess as to WHO got 3/4 of the borrowed money???
That $1.5 trillion "cost" the left keeps bringing up is also people's money. It's not money the government has already collected, it's $1.5 trillion that people get to keep instead of giving it to the government.
The left isn't particularly good at math when it comes to other people's money.
They have already said that 83 or 86% of the cuts will go to the 1%.
Who are "they"? Are "they" the same people who are being referred to when someone says "Anonymous sources say..." or "Most people say..."?
Good. She should be forced out next year along with the GOP congress who will be voted out.Something I saw in Uk Daily...Ivanka carried the day lobbying Congress critters to get this done