Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh? Prove it was obtained under a false pretense...?Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
That is yet to be determined. It was however obtained under a false pretense. I can't imagine that withholding information in a FISA application is legal.
While you’re at it, demonstrate what the government hoped to gain from Trump by wiretapping someone who was not working for the Trump campaign and who had never met Trump?
It's a coming, it's a coming. Right now it looks like they withheld very important information from the court to falsely get that warrant. You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
The FISA system does not investigate crime.
They gather intelligence. Specifically from foreign sources or their agents and assets.
The warrant on Page came about because he had travelled to Russia that summer and met with several high ranking Russian officials. Some of these meetings were described in the dossier. That is why it was used as corroborating information on the warrant application. Page has since confirmed those meetings happened in his testimony before congress.
Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
I love when interweb turds like faun make up their own reality. Remember when you turds lied about the GOP not allowing a Dem memo? Remember when Obama lied about his interactions with the investigation? All you have are lies.Sadly, all you rightards are armed with are lies.Nunes memo: Justice Department's FISA application never disclosed Steele dossier's ties to ClintonOh? Are you a jbond sock?You can't show me shit, because you're wrong
Regardless, the claim is... they [the FBI] did not disclose it [Steele’s dossier] was sourced from Russian intelligence agents.
See if you can prove that ^^^
There is a reason Democrats are fighting the release of more info including testimony.
With a Monday Vote Expected, Democrats Press to Release Their Own Memo
Democrats have publicly called for the Republican-controlled committee to release a transcript of the interview with Mr. McCabe.
You believe the corrupt shills told the FISA court that the dossier was sourced from Russian intelligence. What the fuck are you going to say when that is not in the dim memo?
Who knows just how demented your mind is that you think that after your lie about Democrats not wanting McCabe’s testimony released was just thoroughly squashed.I love when interweb turds like faun make up their own reality. Remember when you turds lied about the GOP not allowing a Dem memo? Remember when Obama lied about his interactions with the investigation? All you have are lies.Sadly, all you rightards are armed with are lies.Nunes memo: Justice Department's FISA application never disclosed Steele dossier's ties to ClintonOh? Are you a jbond sock?
Regardless, the claim is... they [the FBI] did not disclose it [Steele’s dossier] was sourced from Russian intelligence agents.
See if you can prove that ^^^
There is a reason Democrats are fighting the release of more info including testimony.
With a Monday Vote Expected, Democrats Press to Release Their Own Memo
Democrats have publicly called for the Republican-controlled committee to release a transcript of the interview with Mr. McCabe.
You believe the corrupt shills told the FISA court that the dossier was sourced from Russian intelligence. What the fuck are you going to say when that is not in the dim memo?
Anyone notice how the Republicans are requesting official documents to explain what actually happened, and the paid posters on here are NOT insisting that those documents will vindicate their position, but instead are trying to still explain away what the last documentation explained, lol.
I am sorry Leftists, but it is more than obvious to anyone with any sense, that NOBODY would demand the release of factual documents from their original source, that would screw their narrative up.
Now Nunez piece was an opinion piece according to you, so your side released their own opinion piece. Yes, or no!
So now, they want the ACTUAL FACTS released, yes!
So if you are soooooooo confident in your take on the whole thing, join us in demanding it all be released! Let the chips fall where they may. Just think, no more conjecture, we will all know, and won't you finally be happy! We will no longer be able to defend our position, you will have won, isn't that correct?
So lets do this, and get it over with. What do you say? We aren't afraid, and you insist you aren't either, so you see, we actually agree on something.
TRANSPARENCY! Obama said he wanted it, Trump says he wants it, we say we want it, now how about you guys!
That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
What point are you trying to make?
The Dossier was used in the 3 other applications and the FISA Court
wasn't told it was paid and financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.
They hid that from the court. That makes the 3 extensions illegal and very
possibly an abuse of the 4th amendment rights of anybody monitored.
Thus, you can kiss that special counsel goodbye, once SCOTUS has
this presented to them. They'll have no choice, because the FBI/SC
will never be able to distinguish one from the other.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
Only your strawman says it necessarily had to be criminal. In reality, it only had to be suspicious of being criminal.Oh? Prove it was obtained under a false pretense...?Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
That is yet to be determined. It was however obtained under a false pretense. I can't imagine that withholding information in a FISA application is legal.
While you’re at it, demonstrate what the government hoped to gain from Trump by wiretapping someone who was not working for the Trump campaign and who had never met Trump?
It's a coming, it's a coming. Right now it looks like they withheld very important information from the court to falsely get that warrant. You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
The FISA system does not investigate crime.
They gather intelligence. Specifically from foreign sources or their agents and assets.
The warrant on Page came about because he had travelled to Russia that summer and met with several high ranking Russian officials. Some of these meetings were described in the dossier. That is why it was used as corroborating information on the warrant application. Page has since confirmed those meetings happened in his testimony before congress.
Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
And what was illegal about those meetings? Why is he walking around a free man today?
You people on the left have been chasing this Russia ghost for over a year now, and making claims of changing the election. Nothing to prove that. However the person who did have Russian connections and did try to change the election you stick up for because she's a Democrat.
Did the warrant extension result in information pertinent to Mueller's investigation? He was identified as a Russian asset and had a warrant BEFORE WORKING FOR TRUMP. The warrant was extended. All that was necessary was a reasonable probability that he had knowledge relevant to Mueller's investigation of a possible criminal activity.Well Page didn't work for Trump. so what was it they got that would warrant an extension? what was the concern? He worked for them in 2013 after they cleared him. He wasn't under investigation until he volunteered for a month with the campaign. so what was it? The known fake dossier?Well, did they collect anything useful during the extension?well technically, they couldn't use the same evidence to get the extensions. They had to lie and say they were getting intel that was important to continue to collect. Lie after lie, after lie, after lie. There are three afterward.Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
What point are you trying to make?
The Dossier was used in the 3 other applications and the FISA Court
wasn't told it was paid and financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.
They hid that from the court. That makes the 3 extensions illegal and very
possibly an abuse of the 4th amendment rights of anybody monitored.
Thus, you can kiss that special counsel goodbye, once SCOTUS has
this presented to them. They'll have no choice, because the FBI/SC
will never be able to distinguish one from the other.
That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...What point are you trying to make?
The Dossier was used in the 3 other applications and the FISA Court
wasn't told it was paid and financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.
They hid that from the court. That makes the 3 extensions illegal and very
possibly an abuse of the 4th amendment rights of anybody monitored.
Thus, you can kiss that special counsel goodbye, once SCOTUS has
this presented to them. They'll have no choice, because the FBI/SC
will never be able to distinguish one from the other.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
Only your strawman says it necessarily had to be criminal. In reality, it only had to be suspicious of being criminal.Oh? Prove it was obtained under a false pretense...?That is yet to be determined. It was however obtained under a false pretense. I can't imagine that withholding information in a FISA application is legal.
While you’re at it, demonstrate what the government hoped to gain from Trump by wiretapping someone who was not working for the Trump campaign and who had never met Trump?
It's a coming, it's a coming. Right now it looks like they withheld very important information from the court to falsely get that warrant. You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
The FISA system does not investigate crime.
They gather intelligence. Specifically from foreign sources or their agents and assets.
The warrant on Page came about because he had travelled to Russia that summer and met with several high ranking Russian officials. Some of these meetings were described in the dossier. That is why it was used as corroborating information on the warrant application. Page has since confirmed those meetings happened in his testimony before congress.
Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
And what was illegal about those meetings? Why is he walking around a free man today?
You people on the left have been chasing this Russia ghost for over a year now, and making claims of changing the election. Nothing to prove that. However the person who did have Russian connections and did try to change the election you stick up for because she's a Democrat.
Page's intent is irrelevant, as is Steele's. What's relevant is what the FBI thought they might know, and whether there was a reasonable basis for it.That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
The court sure wanted to know what the intent of the informant was. It's one of the questions on the FISA application. I can't wait to see how it was answered too because Steele was a well known Trump hater.
and yet the facts are supporting our beliefs. Again, the position we have always taken is there was no evidence to support the need of Mueller. And now we get verification. don't know what to tell you!Well stated counselor. LOL Nunes has succeeded in showing to the Trumpbots that Mueller has no case. Of course, you knew that before and were not open to factsOh? What part of the following is too difficult for you to comprehend...?That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...What point are you trying to make?
The Dossier was used in the 3 other applications and the FISA Court
wasn't told it was paid and financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.
They hid that from the court. That makes the 3 extensions illegal and very
possibly an abuse of the 4th amendment rights of anybody monitored.
Thus, you can kiss that special counsel goodbye, once SCOTUS has
this presented to them. They'll have no choice, because the FBI/SC
will never be able to distinguish one from the other.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
They did not inform the FISA Court that the dossier was financed and
paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign.
There are no gray areas in applications. They are all black and white.
No Court is going to "assume" or "read between the lines."
If a lawyer wants something to be read between the lines, he damn well
better have some words between the lines.
The FBI and DOJ both believed they needed the extra weight of the Dossier
to continue to get extensions. The FBI and DOJ both believed that if they
told the court it was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign, the court would not issue the extensions.
So they created the omission, which now that it has been discovered is
going to taint and probably destroy their entire case.
Did the warrant extension result in information pertinent to Mueller's investigation? doesn't appear to be. We will see once the FISA court provides the applications, right?Did the warrant extension result in information pertinent to Mueller's investigation? He was identified as a Russian asset and had a warrant BEFORE WORKING FOR TRUMP. The warrant was extended. All that was necessary was a reasonable probability that he had knowledge relevant to Mueller's investigation of a possible criminal activity.Well Page didn't work for Trump. so what was it they got that would warrant an extension? what was the concern? He worked for them in 2013 after they cleared him. He wasn't under investigation until he volunteered for a month with the campaign. so what was it? The known fake dossier?Well, did they collect anything useful during the extension?well technically, they couldn't use the same evidence to get the extensions. They had to lie and say they were getting intel that was important to continue to collect. Lie after lie, after lie, after lie. There are three afterward.Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
What point are you trying to make?
The Dossier was used in the 3 other applications and the FISA Court
wasn't told it was paid and financed by the DNC and Clinton Campaign.
They hid that from the court. That makes the 3 extensions illegal and very
possibly an abuse of the 4th amendment rights of anybody monitored.
Thus, you can kiss that special counsel goodbye, once SCOTUS has
this presented to them. They'll have no choice, because the FBI/SC
will never be able to distinguish one from the other.
Oh? Prove it was obtained under a false pretense...?Those who have carefully read the Nunes memo will notice that it never says the application to monitor Carter Page was illegal.
That is yet to be determined. It was however obtained under a false pretense. I can't imagine that withholding information in a FISA application is legal.
While you’re at it, demonstrate what the government hoped to gain from Trump by wiretapping someone who was not working for the Trump campaign and who had never met Trump?
It's a coming, it's a coming. Right now it looks like they withheld very important information from the court to falsely get that warrant. You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
The FISA system does not investigate crime.
They gather intelligence. Specifically from foreign sources or their agents and assets.
The warrant on Page came about because he had travelled to Russia that summer and met with several high ranking Russian officials. Some of these meetings were described in the dossier. That is why it was used as corroborating information on the warrant application. Page has since confirmed those meetings happened in his testimony before congress.
Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
And what was illegal about those meetings? Why is he walking around a free man today?
You people on the left have been chasing this Russia ghost for over a year now, and making claims of changing the election. Nothing to prove that. However the person who did have Russian connections and did try to change the election you stick up for because she's a Democrat.
and cleared by the FBI in 2013. If he was an asset to the Russians, why wouldn't he be in jail?Oh? Prove it was obtained under a false pretense...?That is yet to be determined. It was however obtained under a false pretense. I can't imagine that withholding information in a FISA application is legal.
While you’re at it, demonstrate what the government hoped to gain from Trump by wiretapping someone who was not working for the Trump campaign and who had never met Trump?
It's a coming, it's a coming. Right now it looks like they withheld very important information from the court to falsely get that warrant. You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
You see, to investigate a crime, you need evidence that such a crime possibly could have been committed. Opposition research isn't enough for that, especially when it is paid for by the opponent of the people you are spying on to prove the crime.
The FISA system does not investigate crime.
They gather intelligence. Specifically from foreign sources or their agents and assets.
The warrant on Page came about because he had travelled to Russia that summer and met with several high ranking Russian officials. Some of these meetings were described in the dossier. That is why it was used as corroborating information on the warrant application. Page has since confirmed those meetings happened in his testimony before congress.
Carter Page's testimony is filled with bombshells — and supports key portions of the Steele dossier
And what was illegal about those meetings? Why is he walking around a free man today?
You people on the left have been chasing this Russia ghost for over a year now, and making claims of changing the election. Nothing to prove that. However the person who did have Russian connections and did try to change the election you stick up for because she's a Democrat.
Who said it was illegal?
He was targeted because of his history of acting as a foreign agent and the nature of who and when he was meeting.
Obama got briefings on these FISA Warrants from The NSI and paid for Steele’s Russian Dossier.
Rice, Mills, and Lynch all knew what was going on too.
Obama and Clinton knowingly colluded with Russia to try to rig our Election and prevent President Trump from taking Office.
All should be tried for Treason and publicly hung.
The Left is trying to protect Clinton and Obama and their inner circle of thieves, liars and traitors.
Page's intent is irrelevant, as is Steele's. What's relevant is what the FBI thought they might know, and whether there was a reasonable basis for it.Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
The court sure wanted to know what the intent of the informant was. It's one of the questions on the FISA application. I can't wait to see how it was answered too because Steele was a well known Trump hater.
That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
The court sure wanted to know what the intent of the informant was. It's one of the questions on the FISA application. I can't wait to see how it was answered too because Steele was a well known Trump hater.
and yet the facts are supporting our beliefs. Again, the position we have always taken is there was no evidence to support the need of Mueller. And now we get verification. don't know what to tell you!Well stated counselor. LOL Nunes has succeeded in showing to the Trumpbots that Mueller has no case. Of course, you knew that before and were not open to factsOh? What part of the following is too difficult for you to comprehend...?That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
They did not inform the FISA Court that the dossier was financed and
paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign.
There are no gray areas in applications. They are all black and white.
No Court is going to "assume" or "read between the lines."
If a lawyer wants something to be read between the lines, he damn well
better have some words between the lines.
The FBI and DOJ both believed they needed the extra weight of the Dossier
to continue to get extensions. The FBI and DOJ both believed that if they
told the court it was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign, the court would not issue the extensions.
So they created the omission, which now that it has been discovered is
going to taint and probably destroy their entire case.
No facts support your beliefs because you have no fucking way of knowing either exactly what the FBI thought Page knew or what they learned through the tap extension.and yet the facts are supporting our beliefs. Again, the position we have always taken is there was no evidence to support the need of Mueller. And now we get verification. don't know what to tell you!Well stated counselor. LOL Nunes has succeeded in showing to the Trumpbots that Mueller has no case. Of course, you knew that before and were not open to factsOh? What part of the following is too difficult for you to comprehend...?That was not hidden from the court, Nunes duped you...
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Republicans concede key FBI 'footnote' in Carter Page warrant
Devin Nunes said Monday the FBI had disclosed political backing for a Trump-Russia dossier in October 2016, but a controversial GOP memo released last week did not mention it.
Republican leaders are acknowledging that the FBI disclosed the political origins of a private dossier the bureau cited in an application to surveil former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page, undermining a controversial GOP memo released Friday and fueling Democratic demands to declassify more information about the bureau’s actions.
They did not inform the FISA Court that the dossier was financed and
paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign.
There are no gray areas in applications. They are all black and white.
No Court is going to "assume" or "read between the lines."
If a lawyer wants something to be read between the lines, he damn well
better have some words between the lines.
The FBI and DOJ both believed they needed the extra weight of the Dossier
to continue to get extensions. The FBI and DOJ both believed that if they
told the court it was a political hit piece paid for by the DNC/Clinton Campaign, the court would not issue the extensions.
So they created the omission, which now that it has been discovered is
going to taint and probably destroy their entire case.
Presupposing that the initial application was above board with 'all' the information given to the FISC judge (it wasn't). Nor were the x3 subsequent re-ups... This is not opinion, it's tangibly supported with evidence.Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
The court sure wanted to know what the intent of the informant was. It's one of the questions on the FISA application. I can't wait to see how it was answered too because Steele was a well known Trump hater.
The intent is irrelevant. If I inform the cops on you and you get arrested, my feelings or motives are irrelevant as long as the information is reliable.
Obviously it was reliable as it was used subsequently for three renewals.
Devin duped me? Well, when he stops by tonight I will inform him of
that.
btw...Nobody disclosed that the memo was bought and paid for by the
DNC and the Clinton Campaign. That's a pretty big omission.
Does that make the information either irrelevant or incorrect?
Yes it does because for one, it shows intent. Two, the information was never verified.
When you pay somebody looking for an outcome, you usually get that outcome even if it's not totally true. And any court should have questioned why this clown was not still working for his government if he was so reliable and good.
The motives of the informant have no bearing on the validity of the information.
You have no idea what was used from the dossier or if it had been corroborated.
The court sure wanted to know what the intent of the informant was. It's one of the questions on the FISA application. I can't wait to see how it was answered too because Steele was a well known Trump hater.
The intent is irrelevant. If I inform the cops on you and you get arrested, my feelings or motives are irrelevant as long as the information is reliable.
Obviously it was reliable as it was used subsequently for three renewals.
