Would that be true of someone who believes that the laws of nature are such that they are designed to produce a certain kind of "crop?"Intelligent Design considers the fact that a Creator incorporated a means by which the universe evolves and grows. Consider that if something (we'll call it a God) was powerful enough to create the entire universe, then this creator was also intelligent enough to ensure that the inner workings of life and creation were able to sustain itself without guidance, or a 'hands-on' approach. Consider it part of that free will thing.
I don't dispute anything you say here, except for the notion that it accurately reflects "official" Intelligent Design dogma. Those who actively champion the notion of "Intelligent Design" absolutely do not describe it as you have. If you read up on it just a little bit, it quickly becomes obvious that it's barely modified Creationism.