Iowa Passes Six Weeks Abortion Ban

[Arlette]

….Instead of the innocent unborn children?

Oh come off it. Just how much did it bother you not being born before you were born? I know it didn't bother me any.

 

[Arlette]

1. It's not the job of the SCOTUS to strike the compromise.

2. Roe wasnt a compromise.

Yes it was. Viability was the compromise

 

[Couchpotato]

Yes it was. Viability was the compromise

That's an ever evolving target. Also not the job of the SCOTUS to determine.

 

[Stann]

Because it violates a specific portion of the Constitution. Post the provision this law violates. We both know why you're attempting to change the subject.

Individual freedoms would cover it all.

 

[Stann]

That's an ever evolving target. Also not the job of the SCOTUS to determine.

That would be true if we had a reasonable just SCOTUS in place, but we don't anymore. They bought into the anti-abortion propaganda. They should recuse themselves.

 

[Lisa558]

Oh come off it. Just how much did it bother you not being born before you were born? I know it didn't bother me any.

These are still beings being robbed of a life - perhaps 90 years of friends, family, travel, a career, community involvement, religious fulfillment, and so forth. The LEAST we can do as the mother robs it of its life is not to wait so long that the baby suffers while the deed is done.

I know you pro-abortion people like to ignore the fact that a second life is involved, and without SOME guidance as to when the killing can take place, the second being will suffer as it is torn limb by limb.

 

[Lisa558]

That would be true if we had a reasonable just SCOTUS in place, but we don't anymore. They bought into the anti-abortion propaganda. They should recuse themselves.

Why? They didn’t outlaw abortion. They just returned the decision to the states, as stipulated in the U.S. Constitution.

 

[Stann]

Because it violates a specific portion of the Constitution. Post the provision this law violates. We both know why you're attempting to change the subject.

And the only reason it wás even mentioned is because the founding fathers feared what a federal military might do to them and they couldn't afford one anyway. They relied on state militias. Which the so.called right to bear arms was referring to, this only applicable to men in those militias ( today's National Guards ) not those crazy private militia groups.

 

[Couchpotato]

And the only read n it wás even mentioned is because the founding fathers feared what a federal military might do to them and they couldn't afford one anyway. They relied on state militias. Which the so.cqpped right to bear arms was referring to, this only applicable to men in those militias ( today's National Guards ) not those crazy private militia groups.

Not what it says, but nice justification. Have you found the provision that this Iowa law violates yet?

 

[Arlette]

These are still beings being robbed of a life - perhaps 90 years of friends, family, travel, a career, community involvement, religious fulfillment, and so forth. The LEAST we can do as the mother robs it of its life is not to wait so long that the baby suffers while the deed is done.

I know you pro-abortion people like to ignore the fact that a second life is involved, and without SOME guidance as to when the killing can take place, the second being will suffer as it is torn limb by limb.

The only right an unborn child should have is being wanted. It's not like we are short on messed up, neglected or abused kids.
It may be unclear to you, but not everyone has the emotional or financial resources to raise a child. You have no clue as to what is the determining factor in an abortion. It's just not a one size fits all situation. Let the people most impacted make the decision. And that would be the woman.

 

[Lisa558]

And the only read n it wás even mentioned is because the founding fathers feared what a federal military might do to them and they couldn't afford one anyway. They relied on state militias. Which the so.cqpped right to bear arms was referring to, this only applicable to men in those militias ( today's National Guards ) not those crazy private militia groups.

Nope….wrong. The 2nd Amendment was, admittedly, written poorly, so one has to read the OTHER writings of our founding fathers. Madison wrote that “the only way for a tyrant to oppress is with an enslaved media (which the Dems about have) and an unarmed populace” (which the Dems are gunning for, pun intended).

 

[Stann]

Not what it says, but nice justification. Have you found the provision that this Iowa law violates yet?

That was the intent, not my endless ownership of guns by the ignorant masses..

 

[Lisa558]

The only right an unborn child should have is being wanted. It's not like we are short on messed up, neglected or abused kids.
It may be unclear to you, but not everyone has the emotional or financial resources to raise a child. You have no clue as to what is the determining factor in an abortion. It's just not a one size fits all situation. Let the people most impacted make the decision. And that would be the woman.

The law we are talking about is a 6-week timeline. There’s no ban. The woman can still rob her child of its life, but she can’t wait so long that it is tortured to death. Surely that’s not too much to ask.

 

[Couchpotato]

That would be true if we had a reasonable just SCOTUS in place, but we don't anymore. They bought into the anti-abortion propaganda. They should recuse themselves.

Its not the job of the SCOTUS regardless of who is a member of the court or their political leanings. The court would have been equally as wrong if they outlawed abortion as they would be if they legalized it. What the court did was their job. Look at the Constitution and determine this issue was not in their purview to decide and thus kick it back to the states as is stated in the Consittution.

BTW here's a link the Constitution. You seem to be having trouble finding that provision which the Iowa law violates.

U.S. Constitution | Constitution Annotated | Congress.gov | Library of Congress

The original text of the United States Constitution and its Amendments.

constitution.congress.gov

 

[Couchpotato]

That was the intent, not my endless ownership of guns by the ignorant masses..

Irrelevant. Stop trying to change the subject.

 

[Arlette]

Nope….wrong. The 2nd Amendment was, admittedly, written poorly, so one has to read the OTHER writings of our founding fathers. Madison wrote that “the only way for a tyrant to oppress is with an enslaved media (which the Dems about have) and an unarmed populace” (which the Dems are gunning for, pun intended).

The arms you can buy ain't gonna save you from a tyrannical government. They just drone your ass and be done with it.

 

[Frankenstein]

This law is punitive and intrusive, totally unconstitutional unless you live in a fascist state with a repressive government. That's what fascist states are all about controlling the people for it's benefit not the people's.

Wow, the Government made her get pregnant?

 

[Lisa558]

The arms you can buy ain't gonna save you from a tyrannical government. They just drone your ass and be done with it.

Yes it will, if an armed revolution takes place.

 

[Lisa558]

This law is punitive and intrusive, totally unconstitutional unless you live in a fascist state with a repressive government. That's what fascist states are all about controlling the people for it's benefit not the people's.

And didn’t our government collude with social media to suppress conservative voices? THAT is what a repressive government does.

 

[Arlette]

The law we are talking about is a 6-week timeline. There’s no ban. The woman can still rob her child of its life, but she can’t wait so long that it is tortured to death. Surely that’s not too much to ask.

It is.
Next