Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 35,092
- 23,154
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Logical next step?
- Thread starter BULLDOG
- Start date
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 35,092
- 23,154
So correct me. What is wrong about what I said?
There is no newfound authority.
No guardrails have come down.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one.
Platitudes. Not actually a correction.There is no newfound authority.
No guardrails have come down.
Impeachment is a political process not a criminal one.
As for no guardrails having come down. You do understand that SCOTUS just REDEFINED presidential immunity. There's an entire OPINION doing just that.
Billiejeens
Diamond Member
- Jun 27, 2019
- 35,092
- 23,154
Platitudes. Not actually a correction.
As for no guardrails having come down. You do understand that SCOTUS just REDEFINED presidential immunity. There's an entire OPINION doing just that.
There's not
They sent 1 case back to a lower court, with instructions
Still not actually correcting my analysis. Let's try it this way.There's not
They sent 1 case back to a lower court, with instructions
Are you contending that a president has always had the right to order Seal team six to take out his opponent? Since you claim this is just reaffirming the status quo.
Or are you arguing he isn't allowed to do that, and I have my analysis wrong of how this would play out under the "instructions" Scotus has put out.
If the second. I want you to tell me how it is wrong. Not just a claim it is. Since you claim you understood the ruling better than me that should be easy.
MagicMike
Platinum Member
- Aug 3, 2021
- 6,361
- 4,337
At the very least Biden should postpone November's election until Trump's trials play out.First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
- Jan 22, 2020
- 13,762
- 12,402
First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
Logical next step?
Put your faith in Fanni!
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,071
- 54,396
A reasonable person can see that Biden's administration is doing what they say Trump will do.First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,071
- 54,396
Isn't that sweet?It does work that way now. The president is now immune from anything he might tell the attorney general to do.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,071
- 54,396
And never did once in the 4 years he was in office. Dumbass.Hell - LOCK HIM UP!! it's what trump would do.
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,071
- 54,396
What do you think Biden is doing? Are you fucking blind?That was before today's ruling
Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,071
- 54,396
Any proof? Look what they have done to Trump. It is political persecution. Does someone has to be charged with something for you to admit it?You got any proof of that, or is that just more made-up shit like usual?
- Sep 13, 2012
- 65,432
- 20,524
First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
"A reasonable person"???????
You commies are nucking futs.
.
Missourian
Diamond Member
- Aug 30, 2008
- 34,932
- 25,731
First, I'm not advocating for any harm to come to trump, or any of his supporters, but in the light of the recent Supreme court ruling, serious uncomfortable questions present themselves. A reasonable person might believe trumps threats to seek revenge on his opponents, as well as his offer to trade environmental protections for a billion dollars present a threat to the constitution and the wellbeing of the country. Having sworn to protect and defend the constitution, and in light of the new presidential authority, it is Biden's duty to prevent any chance of trump winning the upcoming presidential election in any way his newfound authority allows. Should Biden, exercise his newfound authority by imprisoning trump in Guantanamo, or some other way? If congress opposes such actions, they can always impeach him if they can get enough of our representatives to find him guilty.
Good luck.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 191
- Views
- 754
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 192
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 36
- Views
- 214
- Replies
- 5K
- Views
- 75K
- Replies
- 21
- Views
- 124
- Replies
- 3K
- Views
- 45K
- Replies
- 4
- Views
- 50
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8383
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-