WildBillKelsoe
Silver Member
- Dec 23, 2015
- 3,201
- 421
- 90
He made the decision based on the risk of collateral damage, a decision any President would have made. He did in fact try to kill him and Bush never made the attempt. Clinton sent Cruise missiles after him and Bush did not.Blaming New Yorker's for the 9/11 attack is pretty desperate. It was a Texas guy who fell asleep on guard duty.Lol, that is the biggest load of horse shit.
I knew people down here in the DC area that found Madoffs scam to sound suspicious way back in the 1990s, and New Yorkers were just handing him more money hand over fist.
New Yorkers have one of the worst mayors in the country twice in a row and think they are so clever and sophisticated. They take the biggest terror hit with thousands dying and they think they are the nations experts on anti-terrorism. New Yorkers are some of the rudest and most crude people on the planet, rivaling Philadelphia and Paris allowing people to literally piss and shit in their streets and yet they think themselves among the cultural elite and the authority on manners and style.
One thing for certain; New York is the capital of all the self deluded twats on Earth.
Blaming Bush is even worse.
And when Bush was president the right was blaming Clinton. That is the standard MO for either side. It's only a problem when the "other" side is president. When their side does it, they excuse it and blame the previous president.
It was Clinton that passed the chance to kill UBL.
Clinton wasted cruise missiles.