🌟 Exclusive 2024 Prime Day Deals! 🌟

Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁

Is Barack Hussein Obama A MUSLIM?

His first two years in Indonesia were spent in a supposedly "Catholic" school, the next two in the formative years of ages 7-9 were in a Muslim school. He isn't a Catholic, he isn't a Christian, he IS a Muslim as has been amply proven in this thread.

'Supposedly'? Dude, it was a Catholic school, run by Catholics, with a Catholic Saint in the name. St. Francis of Assisi Catholic School. He want there for 1st, 2nd, and part of 3rd grade. He want to a State run school for part 3rd grade and 4th grade, called State Elementary School Menteng 01.

A state run school that was so liberal, some of the teachers wore miniskirts and students were encouraged to celebrate Christmas.

Obama's stepfather, Lolo Soetoro, was much more of a free spirit than a devout Muslim, according to former friends and neighbors. And the school described as an Islamic madrassa in media reports actually was a public school, so progressive that teachers wore miniskirts and all students were encouraged to celebrate Christmas.

Interviews with dozens of former classmates, teachers, neighbors and friends show that Obama was not a regular practicing Muslim when he was in Indonesia, despite being listed as a Muslim on the registration form for the Catholic school, Strada Asisia, where he attended 1st through 3rd grades.

At the time, the school most likely registered children based on the religion of their fathers, said Darmawan, Obama's former teacher. Because Soetoro was a Muslim, Obama was listed as a Muslim, she said.

Obama madrassa myth debunked - chicagotribune.com

But you know better than his former teachers and classmates, huh? Remember, and this point is fundamental: You're hopelessly ignorant. You don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about. And your making your narrative up as you go along based on what you want to believe, rather than what the evidence supports.

Back in reality, when you go back and check with the actual folks that attended or taught at the school....far from the hard core, memorize the Koran by the age of 9, fundamentalist madrassa that you imagine where Obama was converted to Islam for life, Obama wasn't a practicing Muslim, and the school wasn't particularly religious.

Religious studies occurred weekly, for a grand total of 2 hours a week of studying Islam. The rest of the time, it was like any other public school.

When Obama attended 4th grade in 1971, Muslim children spent two hours a week studying Islam, and Christian children spent those two hours learning about the Christian religion.

At holidays, the school made a practice of teaching students about different religions. Students from all religions celebrated Christmas with a Christmas tree and carols. They celebrated the Islamic holiday of Eid al-Adha by handing out a sacrificed goat to the neighborhood's needy.

Photographs from the time show teachers in sleeveless dresses. The only woman who wore a head scarf was the Islamic religion teacher.

"I was really trendy, for example, no sleeves, and miniskirts," recalled Tine Hahiyari, 78, a Protestant who was the school's headmaster from 1972 to 1989. "When I taught sports, I wore shorts."

Obama madrassa myth debunked - chicagotribune.com

Yeah, nothing says 'life long Muslim by the age of 8' like Christmas trees.

The entire period at a State run Indonesian school was 18 months. Yet you claim that from 18 months of attendance in a State run, with a grand total of 2 hours of study of Islam a week at a school 40 years ago, he somehow learned the entire Koran and became a life long secret Muslim.....despite his mother, grandmother, and grandfather being Christian, Obama self declaring Christian faith, his 20 year attendance at a Christian church, his marriage to a Christian, his baptism as a Christian, and is children's baptism as Christian?

That's some weak, weak tea.

And why is 6 to 8 any more or less 'formative' than 8 to 9. Or 10 to 17 for that matter? Your standards are arbitrary, uselessly subjective, and factually baseless. And of course, overwhelmingly contradicted by the evidence.

Again, you're shooting your mouth off without considering the FACTS already in evidence in this thread.
I take it you're not used to be contradicted on the silly shit that you post. Notice you don't actually address any of the truck sized holes blown into the OP's fractured 'logic' by the very facts you claim to support. But instead flee from them entirely, tail tucked snuggly between your legs.

Its not like Obama's Christian faith magically disappears just because its inconvenient to your argument. Nor does the fact that Obama's mother, grand mother and grandfather.....responsible for virtually all of Obama's upbringing, were all Christians. Or that Obama attended a Christian church for 20 years. Or that he married a Christian and had his children baptized as Christian.

Yet astonishingly, and for no particular reason, you pretend none of this ever happened. But why would a rational person ignore these amazingly relevant facts when assessing Obama's religious faith?

There is no reason to ignore any of the theory killing holes in your argument. The OP is simply speculative nonsense grounded in the same desperate, willful ignorance that motivated you to ignore all the facts that obliterate the 'Obama is a muslim' silliness.

You can ignore the facts. But you can't make anyone else ignore them.

BULLSHIT. Obozo was in Wright's church to gather political allies in black Chicago...nothing else. Wright is a racist lunatic who hates America, as was Obozo who refused to wear a Flag pin or put his hand over his heart during the Anthem. Muslims are taught their religious affiliation trumps any nationalistic affiliation.

Says you, citing yourself. And you don't know what you're talking about. You didn't attend any of Reverend Wright's sermons. You've been exposed to few seconds of sounds bites from a fraction of a fraction of a fraction of percent of them. And laughably, you pretend that you're the President again. Insisting that whatever you make up about Obama's motivations must be true. And ignore anything the President has to say about his own motivations entirely.

Um, no. The President is the world's authority on his own motivations and beliefs. While you don't have the slightest clue what you're talking about.

Only thing "broken" is your lying and trying to tie unrelated events together. Obozo has appeased Iran, dropped the economic sanctions, scolded Israel and threatened to shoot down IDF bombers should they have overflown Iraq while we were there.

Appeased them by......what? Negotiating with them, just like Bush? Failing to bomb them, just like Bush? Iran's nuclear history with the US goes back to 2003. With Iran's announcement of uranium enrichment facilities going being in 2002. They've been building nuclear power plants in the country since 1992.

And what did Bush do? Exactly what Obama is doing: talking to the Iranians. When in 2005 Iran removed the seals on its uranium enrichment facilities in express violation of their agreements , what did Bush do in reply? He talked even more to the Iranians.

But when Obama talks to the Iranians....he's 'appeasing'?

You're either wildly ignorant of the history of the US and IRan's nuclear program, stunning hypocritical in your approach to talks, or awkwardly trying to revise history by ignoring the bits that destroy your argument.

Pick one.

There hasn't been a SINGLE Muslim organization in the US that's called for the immediate cessation of hostilities by the various jihadists in the ME. Our "peaceful" Muslims are sideliners who have no more allegiance to the US that's taken them in, than for their homeland. Muslims are not nationalists.....the Koran forbids that. You're so full of shit your eyeballs must be floating.

Says who? Again, your record of accuracy so far has been hopelessly pathetic. You're going to need to provide evidence to back that statement up, as you citing yourself is useless. And of course, we're talking about attacks on the US. And there are Muslim groups o' plenty that have condemned such attacks.

So I ask again, are you claiming that 'most' American muslims want the US, the very country they live in, to burn?

Idiotic. Bush demanded an agreement to leave 10K troops in Iraq via a status of forces agreement. Maliki told Obozo he's do that if US Troopers were placed under Iraqi law. He used that caveat to withdraw all US Forces to appease his traitorous voting base. His ROEs in Afghanistan are the most chickenshit in US military history and have ceded every inch on territory we took under Bush43 back to the taliban. Admit you know nothing about the US Armed Forces ya pansy.

The 2008 Status of Forces agreement that called for a withdraw of US troops by the end of 2011. Bush agreed to this. 'Demanding' one thing and agreeing to something else means exactly jack shyte. What matters is what Bush agreed to.

The withdraw schedule followed by Obama was the *very* withdraw schedule that Bush agreed to in 2008. Not 'some' US forces. Not 'all but 10,000' US forces. But all US forces.

Yet in another stunning act of willful ignorance, you pretend that Bush never agreed to this, reimagine the SOFA to include 10,000 troops, and try and pretend that the Bush administration itself didn't negotiate the very schedule that Obama followed.

Just because you close your eyes doesn't mean the world disappears. Or that history magically changes just because its inconvenient to your argument.

And the 'treacherous voting base' that you so casually condemn is the will of the Iraqi people. You know, the folks that Bush insisted would greet us as liberators. Te one's that Bush insisted we empower by overthrowing Saddam and instituting democracy.

Remember them?

Apparently its only 'democracy' in your mind if the people agree with you. If not, its mere 'treachery'. Even when the time table we're following is exactly what we already agreed to. So now that we have the facts straight, riddle me this: if Bush's time table is proof someone is a Muslim.....then wouldn't Bush, the man who negotiated that time table, be a Muslim by the same logic?

Yeah, I know....that would mandate you apply a semblance of consistent standards. And we both know that's not happening.

Again, you have no idea what you're talking about.....see above.^^^^^[/B]

Again, you ignore the Status of Force Agreements, democracy, and history. Nor do you actually disagree with anything I've said. You already know that Afghanistan refused to extend its SOFA with the US to allow our troops to remain. You already know that the democratically elected government of Afghanistan had already asked us to leave. You already know that we've been 'on the verge of victory'......for a decade.
With no particular end in sight.

But just because you ignore these facts doesn't mean that anyone else is obligated to. You fail yet again.


He knows the Koran by heart, lived and studied as a Muslim....you can pretend he's an apostate but you have no more proof he's renounced the religion of his father than you claim I do he has not. His own writing and speeches indicates he's a Muslim, then and now.

Who says he 'knows the Koran by heart? You do, citing yourself....making it up as you go along. You're using your imagination to support your imagination, with nothing verified in the actual world. Show us the evidence that Obama 'knows the Koran by heart'. Or admit you just made that claim up.

Even logically, your latest steaming pill of rhetorical bullshite makes no sense. He was only at the State school for 18 months. For your delusional narrative to be accurate, that school would have had to have been solely dedicated to memorizing the Koran. Which, of course, it wasn't......it studied Islam for only 2 hours a WEEK. And Obama would have had to have memorized more than a page and a quarter a day, every day, including weekends and holidays, to memorize the Koran. And retain every letter of every word of every page, without exception.

At 8 years old. What kind of a super genius do you assume 8 year old Obama was?

But it still gets worse. He attended a State run school for 18 months. He want to a Catholic School in the same country for 24 months. Yet in another stunning example of wildly inconsistent standards, you insist that 18 months in a State school makes one a life long muslim....while 24 months in a Catholic School DOESN'T make one a life long Catholic?

Do you always wipe your ass with your own standards? Or only when we're talking about Obama?

And of course, the claim that a year and a half in a State school when you're 8 and 9 years old makes one a life long Muslim is baseless nonsense. Just you pretending it must be so. And your imagination doesn't define anything in the real world.

Even your standards are uselessly inconsistent. You insist that 4 years in a Muslim country makes one a Muslim. But 46 years in a Christian country *doesn't* make one a Christian. Despite Obama admitting he's a Christian, being raised by Christian mother, grandmother and grandfather, attending a christian church for 20 years, marrying a Christian, being baptized as a Christian, and having both of his baptized as Christians.

Dude....that's just silly. Your own standards prove Obama's a Christian. He spent more time in a Catholic school than he ever did a State run school in Indonesia. He spent an order of magnitude more time in a Christian country than he ever did a Muslim one. And he was raised by Christians. Yet, you inexplicably conclude that Obama must be a *muslim*?

Your argument just doesn't make the slightest sense. And its laughably contradicted by mountains of evidence that you simply ignore. No one interested in the truth ever would.

I have not, nor would I ever claim to "speak for" the scrawny little Muslim queer. The sight of him makes me sick to my stomach. He is no more qualified to be POTUS than you are if you claim to be an American.

Yet when Obama says he's a Christian, you insist that his own words on his own faith be ignored, and you pretending to speak for Obama be believed.

Um, you don't know shyte about Obama's faith. YOu've never met the man, you don't know him, you've never been in the same room with him. While Obama remains the world's leading authority on his own faith. Laughing.....but you know his heart of hearts, huh? Because you say so?

Um, no.

And 'queer'? Yeah, nothing says 'queer' like girlfriends galore in college, and a wife and 2 kids. You've crossed into naked delusion, ignoring almost every relevant fact so you can keep polishing your little turd of an argument. And all you've managed to do is cover yourself in some rather ignorant shit.
 
Last edited:

Laughing.....you've got to love where they cut off their videos. Here's what your video includes.

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction.

Here's what Obama actually said:

So I have known Islam on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed. That experience guides my conviction that partnership between America and Islam must be based on what Islam is, not what it isn't.

Remarks by the President at Cairo University, 6-04-09 | The White House

Its not like your low information Republican voter is gonna fact check it, or ask why the video cuts out at mid sentence.

For anyone interested in Obama's faith, Obama offers you the world's leading authority on his own beliefs, motivations and faith;
GG:
Is Jesus someone who you feel you have a regular connection with now, a personal connection with in your life?

OBAMA:
Yeah. Yes. I think some of the things I talked about earlier are addressed through, are channeled through my Christian faith and a personal relationship with Jesus Christ.

Obama on faith: The exclusive interview | The Dude Abides

Read the whole interview. Obama is remarkably frank about his faith in God and personal relationship with Jesus Christ.
 
Is Barack Hussein Obama A MUSLIM?

c3549d16.gif
 
Which dip shit moved this to the "CuNsPiraCY ForUm"?

Nobody conspires to be a fucking Muslim. It's not illegal. There are no laws broken.
 
Which dip shit moved this to the "CuNsPiraCY ForUm"?

Nobody conspires to be a fucking Muslim. It's not illegal. There are no laws broken.

As Vigilente's own videos state:

"There's nothing wrong with being a Muslim. President Obama just isn't one."

Which pretty much sums up the situation.
 
Lying (Taqiyya and Kitman)

Question
:
Are Muslims permitted to lie?


Summary Answer
:

Muslim scholars teach that Muslims should generally be truthful to each other, unless the purpose of lying is to "smooth over differences." There are two forms of lying to non-believers that are permitted under certain circumstances, taqiyya and kitman. These circumstances are typically those that advance the cause Islam - in some cases by gaining the trust of non-believers in order to draw out their vulnerability and defeat them.


The Qur'an:

Qur'an (16:106) - Establishes that there are circumstances that can "compel" a Muslim to tell a lie.
Qur'an (3:28) - This verse tells Muslims not to take those outside the faith as friends, unless it is to "guard themselves."
Qur'an (9:3) - "...Allah and His Messenger are free from liability to the idolaters..." The dissolution of oaths with the pagans who remained at Mecca following its capture. They did nothing wrong, but were evicted anyway.
Qur'an (40:28) - A man is introduced as a believer, but one who must "hide his faith" among those who are not believers.
Qur'an (2:225) - "Allah will not call you to account for thoughtlessness in your oaths, but for the intention in your hearts" The context of this remark is marriage, which explains why Sharia allows spouses to lie to each other for the greater good.
Qur'an (66:2) - "Allah has already ordained for you, (O men), the dissolution of your oaths" Qur'an (3:54) - "And they (the disbelievers) schemed, and Allah schemed (against them): and Allah is the best of schemers." The Arabic word used here for scheme (or plot) is makara, which literally means 'deceit'. If Allah is supremely deceitful toward unbelievers, then there is little basis for denying that Muslims are allowed to do the same. (See also 8:30 and 10:21) Taken collectively these verses are interpreted to mean that there are circumstances when a Muslim may be "compelled" to deceive others for a greater purpose.


From the Hadith:


Bukhari (52:269) - "The Prophet said, 'War is deceit.'" The context of this is thought to be the murder of Usayr ibn Zarim and his thirty unarmed men by Muhammad's men after he "guaranteed" them safe passage (see Additional Notes below).

Bukhari (49:857) - "He who makes peace between the people by inventing good information or saying good things, is not a liar." Lying is permitted when the end justifies the means.

Bukhari (84:64-65) - Speaking from a position of power at the time, Ali confirms that lying is permissible in order to deceive an "enemy."

Muslim (32:6303) - "...he did not hear that exemption was granted in anything what the people speak as lie but in three cases: in battle, for bringing reconciliation amongst persons and the narration of the words of the husband to his wife, and the narration of the words of a wife to her husband (in a twisted form in order to bring reconciliation between them)."

Bukhari (50:369) - Recounts the murder of a poet, Ka'b bin al-Ashraf, at Muhammad's insistence. The men who volunteered for the assassination used dishonesty to gain Ka'b's trust, pretending that they had turned against Muhammad. This drew the victim out of his fortress, whereupon he was brutally slaughtered despite putting up a ferocious struggle for his life.

From Islamic Law:

Reliance of the Traveler (p. 746 - 8.2) - "Speaking is a means to achieve objectives. If a praiseworthy aim is attainable through both telling the truth and lying, it is unlawful to accomplish through lying because there is no need for it. When it is possible to achieve such an aim by lying but not by telling the truth, it is permissible to lie if attaining the goal is permissible (N:i.e. when the purpose of lying is to circumvent someone who is preventing one from doing something permissible), and obligatory to lie if the goal is obligatory... it is religiously precautionary in all cases to employ words that give a misleading impression...

"One should compare the bad consequences entailed by lying to those entailed by telling the truth, and if the consequences of telling the truth are more damaging, one is entitled to lie.



Additional Notes:

Muslims are allowed to lie to unbelievers in order to defeat them. The two forms are:

Taqiyya - Saying something that isn't true.

Kitman - Lying by omission. An example would be when Muslim apologists quote only a fragment of verse 5:32 (that if anyone kills "it shall be as if he had killed all mankind") while neglecting to mention that the rest of the verse (and the next) mandate murder in undefined cases of "corruption" and "mischief."

Though not called Taqiyya by name, Muhammad clearly used deception when he signed a 10-year treaty with the Meccans that allowed him access to their city while he secretly prepared his own forces for a takeover. The unsuspecting residents were conquered in easy fashion after he broke the treaty two years later, and some of the people in the city who had trusted him at his word were executed.

Another example of lying is when Muhammad used deception to trick his personal enemies into letting down their guard and exposing themselves to slaughter by pretending to seek peace. This happened in the case of Ka'b bin al-Ashraf (as previously noted) and again later against Usayr ibn Zarim, a surviving leader of the Banu Nadir tribe, which had been evicted from their home in Medina by the Muslims.

At the time, Usayr ibn Zarim was attempting to gather an armed force against the Muslims from among a tribe allied with the Quraish (against which Muhammad had already declared war). Muhammad's "emissaries" went to ibn Zarim and persuaded him to leave his safe haven on the pretext of meeting with the prophet of Islam in Medina to discuss peace. Once vulnerable, the leader and his thirty companions were massacred by the Muslims with ease, belying the probability that they were mostly unarmed, having been given a guarantee of safe passage (Ibn Ishaq 981).

Such was the reputation of Muslims for lying and then killing that even those who "accepted Islam" did not feel entirely safe. The fate of the Jadhima is tragic evidence for this. When Muslim "missionaries" approached their tribe one of the members insisted that they would be slaughtered even though they had already "converted" to Islam to avoid just such a demise. However, the others were convinced that they could trust the Muslim leader's promise that they would not be harmed if they simply offered no resistance. (After convincing the skeptic to lay down his arms, the unarmed men of the tribe were quickly tied up and beheaded - Ibn Ishaq 834 & 837).

Today's Muslims often try to justify Muhammad's murder of poets and others who criticized him at Medina by saying that they broke a treaty by their actions. Yet, these same apologists place little value on treaties broken by Muslims. From Muhammad to Saddam Hussein, promises made to non-Muslim are distinctly non-binding in the Muslim mindset.

Leaders in the Arab world routinely say one thing to English-speaking audiences and then something entirely different to their own people in Arabic. Yassir Arafat was famous for telling Western newspapers about his desire for peace with Israel, then turning right around and whipping Palestinians into a hateful and violent frenzy against Jews.

The 9/11 hijackers practiced deception by going into bars and drinking alcohol, thus throwing off potential suspicion that they were fundamentalists plotting jihad. This effort worked so well, in fact, that even weeks after 9/11, John Walsh, the host of a popular American television show, said that their bar trips were evidence of 'hypocrisy.'

The transmission from Flight 93 records the hijackers telling their doomed passengers that there is "a bomb on board" but that everyone will "be safe" as long as "their demands are met." Obviously none of these things were true, but these men, who were so intensely devoted to Islam that they were willing to "slay and be slain for the cause of Allah" (as the Qur'an puts it) saw nothing wrong with employing Taqiyya in order to facilitate their mission of mass murder.

The Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) insists that it "has not now or ever been involved with the Muslim Brotherhood, or supported any covert, illegal, or terrorist activity or organization." In fact, it was created by the Muslim Brotherhood and has bankrolled Hamas. At least nine founders or board members of ISNA have been accused by prosecutors of supporting terrorism.

Prior to engineering several deadly terror plots, such as the Fort Hood massacre and the attempt to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner, American cleric Anwar al-Awlaki was regularly sought out by NPR, PBS and even government leaders to expound on the peaceful nature of Islam.

The Quran says in several places that Allah is the best at deceiving people. An interesting side note is verse 7:99, which says that the only people who feel secure from Allah are actually those who will perish in Hell. Taken literally, this would mean that those Muslims who arrogantly assume that they will enter heaven are in for a rude surprise (such are the hazards of worshipping an all-powerful deceiver).

The near absence of Qur'anic verse and reliable Hadith that encourage truthfulness is somewhat surprising, given that many Muslims are convinced that their religion teaches honesty. In fact, it is because of this ingrained belief that many Muslims are quite honest. When lying is addressed in the Qur'an, it is nearly always in reference to the "lies against Allah" - referring to the Jews and Christians who rejected Muhammad's claim to being a prophet.

Finally, the circumstances by which Muhammad allowed a believer to lie to a non-spouse are limited to those that either advance the cause of Islam or enable a Muslim to avoid harm to his well-being (and presumably that of other Muslims as well). Although this should be kept very much in mind when dealing with matters of global security, such as Iran's nuclear intentions, it is not grounds for assuming that the Muslim one might personally encounter on the street or in the workplace is any less honest than anyone else.


TheReligionofPeace - Islam: Taqiyya and Lying
 
The bush family had closer ties with muslims. especially dubya bush who exchanged body fluids with his saudi boyfriend at the ranch.

I know. Could you believe that? Makes you wonder where Jeff Gannon was sleeping the dozens of times he spent the night at the White House. You would think the "oh so moral" and "we hate the gays" Republicans would want to know.

dz8lcl.jpg


GanonStoryB.jpg

I'm guessing that Republicans feel as long as it was kept on the "down low", it was OK.
 
The bush family had closer ties with muslims. especially dubya bush who exchanged body fluids with his saudi boyfriend at the ranch.

I know. Could you believe that? Makes you wonder where Jeff Gannon was sleeping the dozens of times he spent the night at the White House. You would think the "oh so moral" and "we hate the gays" Republicans would want to know.

dz8lcl.jpg


GanonStoryB.jpg

I'm guessing that Republicans feel as long as it was kept on the "down low", it was OK.

If that were a democrap, it would be a resume enhancer!
 
No, he is not. No, he never was.

Kinda stupid comment.

Growing up where he did, he had no choice but to be a Muslim. He attended a school to learn the Koran.

Once a Muslim - always a Muslim upon threat of death.

When was the last time you read where he or Michelle or the girls attended a sunday Christian service of any kind?

Saying prayers on the golf course is not a sign of being a true Christian. :eusa_whistle:
 
In addition, I don't have the link but clearly remember reading something where Reverend Wright indicated he found Obama seriously lacking in the understanding of Christian principals. He also indicated that he spend of lot of time with him teaching him what being a member of his church meant.

The question I have is, if he was to practice Christianity and give up Islam, why did he pick one so radical to join and follow?
 
In addition, I don't have the link but clearly remember reading something where Reverend Wright indicated he found Obama seriously lacking in the understanding of Christian principals. He also indicated that he spend of lot of time with him teaching him what being a member of his church meant.

The question I have is, if he was to practice Christianity and give up Islam, why did he pick one so radical to join and follow?

The question I have....is where did he ever adopt Islam? You're simply assuming the basis of your question. And the evidence overwhelmingly contradicts that assumption.

He want to Catholic school longer than he ever did the State run school that taught Islam 2 hours a week. If attendance equals religion, then he's clearly a Catholic.

Obama's mother was Christian. His grandfather was Christian. His grandmother was Christian. He's lived in a Christian nation for 44 years. He's attended a Christian church for 20. He married a Christian. He's admitted he's a Christian and expressed his personal relationship with Jesus Christ. He was baptized a Christian. His children were baptized Christian.

But somehow that all means he's Muslim? Um, that doesn't make the slightest sense.
 
Probably. Not many 'Husseins' out there who aren't Muslims. His whole Presidency is a lie. He should have already been Impeached.
 

Forum List

Back
Top