Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'd like to refute some bad denier pseudoscience, but it's getting hard to find any of it (Billy's insanity doesn't qualify). The deniers used to fake trying science, but they've given up even that pretense. Failing so hard at the science and being humiliated over and over must have taken its toll on their poor little minds, so they don't try anymore. Now it's just 24/7 power sulking about the VastGlobalSocialistConspiracy and how meeeeeeaaaaaaaaan those awful liberals are.
Here's a tactic the deniers here will all approve of. In Florida, it's now forbidden for anyone in the government to say "global warming" or "climate change". Again, the frustrated deniers have given up on science, and instead are choosing to fly their Stalinist freak flag proudly.
In Florida officials ban term climate change Miami Herald Miami Herald
And forty years ago we were on the brink of an ice age.So, we have someone claiming to be a Phd scientist claiming that all the other scientists in the world are engaged in fraud for money. No matter what nation, political group, or culture they belong to. Now that is one hell of a conspiracy theory. All the scientists in the world are lying jackasses.So says Billy Boob, and only every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with him. But, obviously, Billy Boob is right.
ALL of whom generate their funding by perpetuating the fraud. Funny how you can point to that behavior when it's a repub douche doing it but are absolutely blind to it when it's a progressive.
Might be a lot more logical to believe that the person making the accusation is a lying jackass.
20 years from now it'll be something else.
Insignificant humans think they have that much sway over a planetary ecosystem
Scroll back, sir.And forty years ago we were on the brink of an ice age.So, we have someone claiming to be a Phd scientist claiming that all the other scientists in the world are engaged in fraud for money. No matter what nation, political group, or culture they belong to. Now that is one hell of a conspiracy theory. All the scientists in the world are lying jackasses.So says Billy Boob, and only every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with him. But, obviously, Billy Boob is right.
ALL of whom generate their funding by perpetuating the fraud. Funny how you can point to that behavior when it's a repub douche doing it but are absolutely blind to it when it's a progressive.
Might be a lot more logical to believe that the person making the accusation is a lying jackass.
20 years from now it'll be something else.
Insignificant humans think they have that much sway over a planetary ecosystem
You know, that myth was old the first 1000 times I heard it. Try again.
A mere five posts above this one of yours proves you wrongAnd forty years ago we were on the brink of an ice age.
The scientists were predicting warming back then. And have been proven correct, as the steady and ongoing warming demonstrates.
In contrast, deniers have been predicting cooling pretty much nonstop for 40 years, and are still doing so. Isn't 40 years of constant failure enough to demonstrate deniers always get it wrong? If not, how long will it take?
It is not a pollutant, but it can act as a forcing factor for increased warming.
Also,
Does high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2
Please provide proof of this allegation. Current empirical evidence shows a dampening effect, which has stopped any warming whatsoever over the last 155 years, that could be attributed to CO2.
Your paper gives no evidence of such warming and only stated conjecture.
See the NAS final report:
America s Climate Choices Final Report Climate Change at the National Academies
i.e., the section that discusses CO2 as both a feedback and forcing factor.
I'd like to refute some bad denier pseudoscience, but it's getting hard to find any of it (Billy's insanity doesn't qualify). The deniers used to fake trying science, but they've given up even that pretense. Failing so hard at the science and being humiliated over and over must have taken its toll on their poor little minds, so they don't try anymore. Now it's just 24/7 power sulking about the VastGlobalSocialistConspiracy and how meeeeeeaaaaaaaaan those awful liberals are.
Here's a tactic the deniers here will all approve of. In Florida, it's now forbidden for anyone in the government to say "global warming" or "climate change". Again, the frustrated deniers have given up on science, and instead are choosing to fly their Stalinist freak flag proudly.
In Florida officials ban term climate change Miami Herald Miami Herald
Actually, it shows you're confused enough to claim Walter Cronkite was a scientist.
We don't make that error.
Leading question, I motion to strike.
Oxygen can be toxic in huge amounts.
We are ALL Carbon based, nothing wrong with that. CO2 produced in huge amounts by our industries, ( seen any footage of Beijing smog) will leave little doubt. It isn't a Solar issue. It's human overpopulation making lots of poo poo that is tipping the scales here. Pain pure and simple.
So, we have someone claiming to be a Phd scientist claiming that all the other scientists in the world are engaged in fraud for money. No matter what nation, political group, or culture they belong to. Now that is one hell of a conspiracy theory. All the scientists in the world are lying jackasses.So says Billy Boob, and only every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with him. But, obviously, Billy Boob is right.
ALL of whom generate their funding by perpetuating the fraud. Funny how you can point to that behavior when it's a repub douche doing it but are absolutely blind to it when it's a progressive.
Might be a lot more logical to believe that the person making the accusation is a lying jackass.
No, only the ones involved in the fraud of AGW. A very small number of actual scientists. But never let a real fact get in the way of an olfraud meme.
It is not a pollutant, but it can act as a forcing factor for increased warming.
Also,
Does high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2
Please provide proof of this allegation. Current empirical evidence shows a dampening effect, which has stopped any warming whatsoever over the last 155 years, that could be attributed to CO2.
Your paper gives no evidence of such warming and only stated conjecture.
See the NAS final report:
America s Climate Choices Final Report Climate Change at the National Academies
i.e., the section that discusses CO2 as both a feedback and forcing factor.
The report is factually incorrect. Empirical evidence clearly shows that it is incorrect.. Now why would a political agency write a report to support its political goals and forget the empirical evidence? BECAUSE IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SCIENCE!
Qouting Nutter-Cellie...???? OMG to funny.. One of the original nuts who made up the lie... Circular Review of Claims... You seriously posted this as proof of the lie? One of the liars proving his own lie.....So, we have someone claiming to be a Phd scientist claiming that all the other scientists in the world are engaged in fraud for money. No matter what nation, political group, or culture they belong to. Now that is one hell of a conspiracy theory. All the scientists in the world are lying jackasses.So says Billy Boob, and only every single Scientific Society, every National Academy of Science, and every major University disagrees with him. But, obviously, Billy Boob is right.
ALL of whom generate their funding by perpetuating the fraud. Funny how you can point to that behavior when it's a repub douche doing it but are absolutely blind to it when it's a progressive.
Might be a lot more logical to believe that the person making the accusation is a lying jackass.
No, only the ones involved in the fraud of AGW. A very small number of actual scientists. But never let a real fact get in the way of an olfraud meme.
Climate contrarians accidentally confirm the 97 global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
It is not a pollutant, but it can act as a forcing factor for increased warming.
Also,
Does high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2
Please provide proof of this allegation. Current empirical evidence shows a dampening effect, which has stopped any warming whatsoever over the last 155 years, that could be attributed to CO2.
Your paper gives no evidence of such warming and only stated conjecture.
See the NAS final report:
America s Climate Choices Final Report Climate Change at the National Academies
i.e., the section that discusses CO2 as both a feedback and forcing factor.
The report is factually incorrect. Empirical evidence clearly shows that it is incorrect.. Now why would a political agency write a report to support its political goals and forget the empirical evidence? BECAUSE IT HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH SCIENCE!
The evidence used in the report is empirical.
Also, it's not a political agency.
Finally, an independent study supported by skeptics confirms the same:
Bombshell Koch-Funded Study Finds Global Warming Is Real On The High End And Essentially All Due To Carbon Pollution ThinkProgress
Even a paper written by skeptics confirms the consensus:
Climate contrarians accidentally confirm the 97 global warming consensus Dana Nuccitelli Environment The Guardian
Ok, I got carried away, sue me.Leading question, I motion to strike.
Well, I don't know about leading, but it's certainly pointless. As far as I know, the only people who EVER call CO2 a pollutant are the deniers who ask the lead post's question.
Oxygen can be toxic in huge amounts.
It becomes toxic at 2 ATM absolute. If you hooked a scuba regulator to tanks of oxygen and headed down, at 33 feet you would go into convulsions and, if not retrieved, die.
We are ALL Carbon based, nothing wrong with that. CO2 produced in huge amounts by our industries, ( seen any footage of Beijing smog) will leave little doubt. It isn't a Solar issue. It's human overpopulation making lots of poo poo that is tipping the scales here. Pain pure and simple.
Global warming and smog aren't quite the same phenomenon, but, as you say, it is CO2 and it is not solar. I'm not sure, however, what you mean by "pain, pure and simple".
"The only people that call CO2 a pollutant" is the SCOTUS when it ruled that the EPA can regulate it.Leading question, I motion to strike.
Well, I don't know about leading, but it's certainly pointless. As far as I know, the only people who EVER call CO2 a pollutant are the deniers who ask the lead post's question.
Oxygen can be toxic in huge amounts.
It becomes toxic at 2 ATM absolute. If you hooked a scuba regulator to tanks of oxygen and headed down, at 33 feet you would go into convulsions and, if not retrieved, die.
We are ALL Carbon based, nothing wrong with that. CO2 produced in huge amounts by our industries, ( seen any footage of Beijing smog) will leave little doubt. It isn't a Solar issue. It's human overpopulation making lots of poo poo that is tipping the scales here. Pain pure and simple.
Global warming and smog aren't quite the same phenomenon, but, as you say, it is CO2 and it is not solar. I'm not sure, however, what you mean by "pain, pure and simple".
