Is Donald Trump a traitor? His path to the White House suggests a pattern of profound disloyalty

[westwall]

Only to a moron. The facts are the russki's DIDN'T interfere in the election. The shrilary fucked up by using a private server and having classified material on it which is a felony. The obummer admin gave her a pass because he wanted her to be obummer III, the American People though knew she was a shit candidate. You want to know who interfered with the election? The shrilary and the obummer admin, that's who.

Comrade is ignoring all the intelligence agenices and the US Senate. Take Putin's manhood out of your mouth. You and Chump are traitors.

You first.......The only traitor I see is obummer, and you who support him.

 

[oreo]

Brennan STILL hasn't produced any proof of the Ivans playing in our sandbox and neither Comey or Clapper have said they agree with Brennan on the matter.....Brennan said that about them. Once again we see that Barry has every agency in his domain politicized and useless.

Wrong Comey a traitor himself to his badge--did in fact recently state that Russia was involved in helping Trump get elected.
http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ck-aimed-at-helping-trump-win-election-report

Comey and his malfeasance in all of this will be the next investigation
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey’s ‘breach of protocol’
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

 

[Darkwind]

More bullshit.

Facts. Get them. Lindsey Graham: Donald Trump disagrees with the entire US Senate on Russia - CNNPolitics.com

I knew that's all you had. Graham who along with McCain want to delegitimize Trump's election. Losers both. Both having done Obama's dirty trying to keep Morsi and the Muslim Brotherhood in power.

These two bastards should just walk across the aisle and have done.

Hey look! It's another conservative who thinks she knows MORE than the FBI, CIA, senators and intelligence officials. lol, tell us, TinyDancer, how exactly are you acquiring the information that disproves Russia's interference in our election?

This should be good...

Hey look! It's a progressive fool who while telling the world that the CIA couldn't find its own ass with both hands in one case, will then say they are the best in the world when it suits you. Guess what cupcake, that ain't the real world. If they are going to make that claim they had better pony up some evidence. So far it's no joy in that respect.

No one has to "pony up" classified evidence to some know-nothing rightist clown on the internet to placate his asinine demands and give away confidential info to the enemy in the process. Life doesn't work that way, conservative fuckboi.

Which means that you have only unnamed sources inside the intel community saying they think that Russia was involved in hacking the Clinton campaign. No evidence exists to substantiate their claim or yours. Since the organization responsible for releasing the truth about Clinton has stated outright that Russia was not responsible for the acquisition of the information; your entire argument falls apart.

Dissemination of information is not interference with any election. Unless you are willing to make the claim that all media outlets are guilty of electioneering. What is really telling here is the fact that if this had happened to the GOP, you'd be good with it.

 

[Remodeling Maidiac]

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Republican nominee Donald Trump urged a foreign power, Russia, to interfere in the American election in order to undermine his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. Russia complied. The American intelligence community, including the CIA and FBI, has reached a “strong consensus” that the Russians interfered with the presidential election in order to help Donald Trump win.

It has also been reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally directed this espionage operation. So serious was Russian interference in the American presidential election that the Obama administration warned Putin that it was tantamount to “armed conflict.”

Republican leaders in Congress were briefed on Russia’s interference in the presidential election and how it was targeted at elevating Trump and hurting Clinton. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other congressional Republicans chose to block any public discussion of these findings. In what could be construed as a quid pro quo, McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, has been selected by President-elect Trump for a Cabinet position in his administration.

Donald Trump’s flirtations with Russia and Vladimir Putin are part of a broader pattern of reckless and irresponsible behavior. Trump has numerous conflicts of financial interest that would appear to violate the emoluments clause of the Constitution. His sons, Eric and Donald Jr., were involved in a scheme (since withdrawn) that looked a lot like an attempt to sell access to his administration through million-dollar “charity” donations.

Trump has threatened to violate the First Amendment by suppressing freedom of the press, encouraged violence against Clinton and those he deemed his enemies, suggested he would not respect the outcome of the election if he lost and now promoted people widely regarded as white supremacists or white nationalists to senior positions in his administration. Donald Trump has also selected key advisers and cabinet level officials who have close personal and financial relationships with Russian leaders in banking, finance and government.

The sum total of these facts leads to a very troubling conclusion.

President-elect Donald Trump is a traitor. As suggested by John Shattuck, a Harvard university professor, in the Boston Globe, Trump’s actions may approach the legal definition of treason as defined by U.S. federal law.

Rest here: Is Donald Trump a traitor? His path to the White House suggests a pattern of profound disloyalty

I miss the days when the left occasionally made threads that weren't that of a 15 year old child. One where real discussion was an option.

Not gonna lie tho. Making fun of you libstains is pretty damn fun too

 

[easyt65]

I think....

Yup, we can all stop right there.....

 

[westwall]

Brennan STILL hasn't produced any proof of the Ivans playing in our sandbox and neither Comey or Clapper have said they agree with Brennan on the matter.....Brennan said that about them. Once again we see that Barry has every agency in his domain politicized and useless.

Wrong Comey a traitor himself to his badge--did in fact recently state that Russia was involved in helping Trump get elected.
http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ck-aimed-at-helping-trump-win-election-report

Comey and his malfeasance in all of this will be the next investigation
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey’s ‘breach of protocol’
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

 

[oreo]

Brennan STILL hasn't produced any proof of the Ivans playing in our sandbox and neither Comey or Clapper have said they agree with Brennan on the matter.....Brennan said that about them. Once again we see that Barry has every agency in his domain politicized and useless.

Wrong Comey a traitor himself to his badge--did in fact recently state that Russia was involved in helping Trump get elected.
http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ck-aimed-at-helping-trump-win-election-report

Comey and his malfeasance in all of this will be the next investigation
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey’s ‘breach of protocol’
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

 

[AmericanFirst1]

During the 2016 presidential campaign, Republican nominee Donald Trump urged a foreign power, Russia, to interfere in the American election in order to undermine his Democratic rival Hillary Clinton. Russia complied. The American intelligence community, including the CIA and FBI, has reached a “strong consensus” that the Russians interfered with the presidential election in order to help Donald Trump win.

It has also been reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin personally directed this espionage operation. So serious was Russian interference in the American presidential election that the Obama administration warned Putin that it was tantamount to “armed conflict.”

Republican leaders in Congress were briefed on Russia’s interference in the presidential election and how it was targeted at elevating Trump and hurting Clinton. Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and other congressional Republicans chose to block any public discussion of these findings. In what could be construed as a quid pro quo, McConnell’s wife, Elaine Chao, has been selected by President-elect Trump for a Cabinet position in his administration.

Donald Trump’s flirtations with Russia and Vladimir Putin are part of a broader pattern of reckless and irresponsible behavior. Trump has numerous conflicts of financial interest that would appear to violate the emoluments clause of the Constitution. His sons, Eric and Donald Jr., were involved in a scheme (since withdrawn) that looked a lot like an attempt to sell access to his administration through million-dollar “charity” donations.

Trump has threatened to violate the First Amendment by suppressing freedom of the press, encouraged violence against Clinton and those he deemed his enemies, suggested he would not respect the outcome of the election if he lost and now promoted people widely regarded as white supremacists or white nationalists to senior positions in his administration. Donald Trump has also selected key advisers and cabinet level officials who have close personal and financial relationships with Russian leaders in banking, finance and government.

The sum total of these facts leads to a very troubling conclusion.

President-elect Donald Trump is a traitor. As suggested by John Shattuck, a Harvard university professor, in the Boston Globe, Trump’s actions may approach the legal definition of treason as defined by U.S. federal law.

Rest here: Is Donald Trump a traitor? His path to the White House suggests a pattern of profound disloyalty

Not like obuthole the lying moose posts.

 

[easyt65]

Liberals are not pissed that Comey investigated Hillary.

They are rabidly pissed at the Hillary / Obama / liberal dirt that was exposed.

When Comey declared he would not recommend indictment, snowflakes wanted to create a gold statue of Comey and place it next to the Lincoln Memorial.

When Huma's illegal emails on a personal PC shared with her pedophile husband was found - to include classified e-mails from Hillary and Comey re-opened the case, Libs did 1 '180', calling for his head AGAIN.

The truth, IMO, is that Comey's last-minute re-opening of the investigation did NOTHING to alter voters' perceptions and decisions already made.

Like the 'Russians stole the election' crap, the persecution of Comey is just another excuse.

 

[westwall]

Brennan STILL hasn't produced any proof of the Ivans playing in our sandbox and neither Comey or Clapper have said they agree with Brennan on the matter.....Brennan said that about them. Once again we see that Barry has every agency in his domain politicized and useless.

Wrong Comey a traitor himself to his badge--did in fact recently state that Russia was involved in helping Trump get elected.
http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ck-aimed-at-helping-trump-win-election-report

Comey and his malfeasance in all of this will be the next investigation
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey’s ‘breach of protocol’
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

 

[Tom Horn]

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

The whole "intent" argument is ridiculous....we don't have a single statute on our books that allows for it. Ignorance of the law is no defense for breaking it. Now certainly if every law were enforced to the "nth" degree, we would live in chaos. Arguing with a cop could always be called "disorderly behavior"...spitting in public could be construed as a health hazard or "endangering" others. A man who took a woman's eager return of his kiss as implicit permission to then feel her breasts, could be charged with "sexual assault". It's up to the cop on the beat to determine the extent of the the law, not it's intent. And if the cop is prejudiced or inclined to look away, then it's the DA's decision to charge or ignore, then the Judge, and ultimately the jury of our peers.

 

[oreo]

Wrong Comey a traitor himself to his badge--did in fact recently state that Russia was involved in helping Trump get elected.
http://www.usnews.com/news/national...ck-aimed-at-helping-trump-win-election-report

Comey and his malfeasance in all of this will be the next investigation
Eric Holder and 100 other former Justice officials sign letter blasting Comey’s ‘breach of protocol’
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

Link to that claim?

James Comey--went into a great description as to why a former 4 star General and CIA director was charged and she wasn't.
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

David Petraeus was also one of Trump's picks for his Secretary of State--LOL So clearly Trump was NOT that excited about Hillary Clinton's emails.

The things FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh don't tell you is amazing.

 

[westwall]

Comey investigates Hillary: "Comey is a traitor."

Comey refuses to request an indictment: "Comey is a hero."

Comey re-opens investigation: "Comey is a traitor."

Notice the pattern with liberals?

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

Link to that claim?

James Comey--went into a great description as to why a former 4 star General and CIA director was charged and she wasn't.
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

David Petraeus was also one of Trump's picks for his Secretary of State--LOL So clearly Trump was NOT that excited about Hillary Clinton's emails.

The things FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh don't tell you is amazing.

It's not a claim silly boy. You link to a section of the law that specifically mentions intent.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

I think he is most likely a Martian.

 

[oreo]

In the thousands of emails that Comey investigated--looking for knowledge of wrong doing and INTENT--he himself did with one letter and one single email. This is what happens when you put an ego orientated male in charge of something that immediately puts him in the limelight. They want more of it.

Comey was warned by the DOJ that he was breaking protocol by releasing information within 60 days of an election, and he sends a letter to congress anyway. Then he sends out an email when Justice officials where questioning his INTENTION by saying he felt the "need" to update the American public. 7 days later after millions of people voted, believing that charges were imminent against Hillary Clinton, he gives birth to his NOTHING BURGER.
DOJ Complaint Filed Against FBI Director James Comey For Interfering In Presidential Election

James Comey is clearly in violation of the Hatch Act of 1939. If Republicans won't prosecute him, be assured that when Democrats take over the house or Senate in 2018, that will be their first priority. And you're going to find that Rudy Guiliani, campaign adviser to the Trump campaign, and James Kolstrom, former FBI director of the FBI office in New York City, both frequent flyers on FOX NEWS (the only news network who let's their audience determine, what they want to hear news) are heavily involved in this.
Meet Donald Trump’s Top FBI Fanboy
Hatch Act of 1939 - Wikipedia

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

Link to that claim?

James Comey--went into a great description as to why a former 4 star General and CIA director was charged and she wasn't.
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

David Petraeus was also one of Trump's picks for his Secretary of State--LOL So clearly Trump was NOT that excited about Hillary Clinton's emails.

The things FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh don't tell you is amazing.

It's not a claim silly boy. You link to a section of the law that specifically mentions intent.

Have you ever heard of implied law? When you're hired for a job, it is "implied" that you will NOT purposely do harm to your employer by will full INTENT. You are human, so it is presumed that you will make mistakes and at times use poor judgement, and you will not be charged or prosecuted for it. This is implied when you filled out your job application.
implied

I knew an electrician that blew up over 150K in new transformers that his employer just paid for. He wasn't charged or prosecuted for it. He made a mistake and wired them wrong.

Furthermore, it was a Senior IT staffer working at the state department that set up and maintained Hillary Clinton's server. Now if anyone would have known that was the wrong thing to do, it would have been a Senior IT staffer working at the State Department. It's probably because he had done others in the past, and it never was an issue until NOW. Of course, he received immunity from the FBI to save his own ass. Because if anyone was going to get cooked for it, it would have been him.

 

[TheDude]

I read you're a liar, cause and effect challenged, desperate, and a liberal subservient.

 

[westwall]

I suggest you look at the wording of the law. Intent doesn't appear anywhere within the body of the law. Comey had to manufacture that as a requirement. Thus comey was actually violating his ethics to support the shrilary and her uber boss obama.

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

Link to that claim?

James Comey--went into a great description as to why a former 4 star General and CIA director was charged and she wasn't.
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

David Petraeus was also one of Trump's picks for his Secretary of State--LOL So clearly Trump was NOT that excited about Hillary Clinton's emails.

The things FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh don't tell you is amazing.

It's not a claim silly boy. You link to a section of the law that specifically mentions intent.

Have you ever heard of implied law? When you're hired for a job, it is "implied" that you will NOT purposely do harm to your employer by will full INTENT. You are human, so it is presumed that you will make mistakes and at times use poor judgement, and you will not be charged or prosecuted for it. This is implied when you filled out your job application.
implied

I knew an electrician that blew up over 150K in new transformers that his employer just paid for. He wasn't charged or prosecuted for it. He made a mistake and wired them wrong.

Furthermore, it was a Senior IT staffer working at the state department that set up and maintained Hillary Clinton's server. Now if anyone would have known that was the wrong thing to do, it would have been a Senior IT staffer working at the State Department. It's probably because he had done others in the past, and it never was an issue until NOW. Of course, he received immunity from the FBI to save his own ass. Because if anyone was going to get cooked for it, it would have been him.

The Security of information laws are very clear. You can try and apologize for the shrilary's incredibly stupid decision to place classified material on a NON-GOVERNMENT server, but that is all you are doing. She broke the law, she got a pass because she is part of the political elite. You are flat assed wrong on everything.

 

[OKTexas]

To all who enter this thread bring.
View attachment 104135

View attachment 104136
It's getting deep in here.

Wrong kind of shovel, try this one.

 

[oreo]

NOPE--if there was no INTENT needed---we could all be charged and prosecuted for common workplace errors.

Furthermore, Democrats may want payback over all these investigations, and want to do one on Colin Powell's emails when he was secretary of State. He also received "classified" documents on his un-secure AOL email account.
Rice Aides, Powell Also Got Classified Info on Personal Email Accounts

The bottom line: Democrats may try to turn the revelations about the email accounts used by Powell and Rice’s staff into a scandal. They may release press statements condemning the former secretaries of state; they may call for scores of unnecessary congressional hearings; they may go to the press and confidently proclaim that crimes were committed by these honorable Republicans. But it would all be lies. Powell and Rice did nothing wrong. This could be considered a scandal only by ignorant or lying partisans.

So there is no Powell or Rice email scandal. And no doubt, that will infuriate the Republicans who are trying so hard to trick people into believing Clinton committed a crime by doing the exact same thing as her predecessors.
The shocking truth: Colin Powell’s emails don’t matter

So there's enough email scandals between Colin Powell, Condi Rice, and Hillary Clinton to last you for a century--LOL

The law has no provision for intent. Look it up. There is a USN sailor sitting in prison right this very minute because he took pictures of his work space on a Nuke sub. No intent to turn any of those images over to a foreign power. Just the mere act of HAVING them was enough. Her actions fall under the same law.

Link to that claim?

James Comey--went into a great description as to why a former 4 star General and CIA director was charged and she wasn't.
James Comey: David Petraeus case worse than Hillary Clinton's emails - CNNPolitics.com

David Petraeus was also one of Trump's picks for his Secretary of State--LOL So clearly Trump was NOT that excited about Hillary Clinton's emails.

The things FOX NEWS and Rush Limbaugh don't tell you is amazing.

It's not a claim silly boy. You link to a section of the law that specifically mentions intent.

Have you ever heard of implied law? When you're hired for a job, it is "implied" that you will NOT purposely do harm to your employer by will full INTENT. You are human, so it is presumed that you will make mistakes and at times use poor judgement, and you will not be charged or prosecuted for it. This is implied when you filled out your job application.
implied

I knew an electrician that blew up over 150K in new transformers that his employer just paid for. He wasn't charged or prosecuted for it. He made a mistake and wired them wrong.

Furthermore, it was a Senior IT staffer working at the state department that set up and maintained Hillary Clinton's server. Now if anyone would have known that was the wrong thing to do, it would have been a Senior IT staffer working at the State Department. It's probably because he had done others in the past, and it never was an issue until NOW. Of course, he received immunity from the FBI to save his own ass. Because if anyone was going to get cooked for it, it would have been him.

The Security of information laws are very clear. You can try and apologize for the shrilary's incredibly stupid decision to place classified material on a NON-GOVERNMENT server, but that is all you are doing. She broke the law, she got a pass because she is part of the political elite. You are flat assed wrong on everything.

There weren't any classified documents placed on her server--LOL As with Colin Powell & Condi Rice emails were marked with some sort of classification long after they received or sent them.

 

[The Professor]

How many times are you gonna recycle that shit, SYTFE?

What, the pic? Y u no love that pic of reptilian Donald?

No, the bullshit story about Russian hacking. You're not gonna undo the election.

Meh! Trump did say the election would be rigged in his favor! What are you conservatards complaining about! So what if Trump needed the help of Russia!!!!

Trump never said the elections would be rigged in his favor. I don't know where you got this nonsense but it isn't true.

Trump did say he thought the election would be rigged AGAINST him but he never suggested it would be rigged FOR him. If you had given just a few seconds of serious thought to the matter you would have realized that no candidate would ever publicly claim that the election would be rigged in his favor. Further, If Trump had made such a foolish and self-destructive statement it would have been all over the MSM; however, the entire MSM failed to say anything about it.

Take note that I am not asking you for a link to support your laughable claim that Trump said the election would be rigged in his favor. I already knew there are no legitimate sources. Perhaps some looney tunes on face book but no reputable news source.

You're new to this forum. You will quickly learn that there are many posters on this site who are a hell of a lot more informed than you are. I suggest you do a little bit of research before you post and be able to back up what you say. When you make unfounded claims, you will be called on it.

You have the last word. I've said what I wanted to say and I am done with you.