Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA?

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Key word "still"

Yep. That's a big first step, much bigger than gay unrelated adults, much.

Next

Fucking your best friend isn't illegal in the country, while fucking your mommy or your little sister is. Best of luck.

Marriage has nothing to do with reproduction. Isn't that what you just said?

That's what I said. Gay sex is legal, so now gay marriage is legal. Since incest sex is illegal, what's the first step to incest marriage? Even you should be able to figure that out.

Yes... The error was I legalizing sexual deviancy.

Noted.

And you feel that by allowing homosexuals to legally have sex... So that they could be accepted as people... And not have to live in the shadows, that this; in your feelings, authorized the perverse among us to define the most critical of all cultural institutions?

ROFLMNAO.

Now isn't that precious?

LOL! How adorable is THAT?

(The reader should understand that what you see in the addled notions of the mentally disordered is the reason that homosexuals have spent 99.9999% of human existence in the closet.

Without exception, every time that they've been mainstreamed, they have taken to completely screwing things up.

And the reason for that, is that homosexuality is a presentation of mental disorder; think of it as a bad operating system that produces severely flawed reasoning... The ancillary flaw and the most dangerous property of such is that the Homo- OS is a virus, spreading flawed reasoning like the flu... .

This, as you might imagine, doesn't take long before the culture itself, in its entirety its inevitably collapsed from the effects of a severe case of the Dumbass.

 

[HappyJoy]

The basis for your argument is the tradition based on procreation and the need to establish a "new" unit so that defective gene pools are not sanctioned by the state.

When same sex marriage is codified that argument is moot with same sex siblings.

and with mother/daughter, father/son, and multiple person "marriages". The libs and gay mafia have no idea what they are opening up

Why does the Right have so little Faith along so little clue and so little Cause? Is Individual Liberty too much of a moral challenge for the Right.

You're a lying POS. There are as many people on the left that piss on gays as there are on the right. The only difference is the left needed the votes in 2008 and some folks on the right are stubborn as hell.

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

the OP asks if gay marriage is the most important issue facing our nation today. Some of you apparently think it is. the next question is why do you think that?

The discussion has migrated to the what will happen if gay marriage is federally sanctioned, several have made the logical next step to same sex sibling marriage, which would become legal is SSM became legal.

Sibling marriage could be done to reduce income taxes and inheritence taxes. Sex is not a prerequisite to marriage as many of you on the left have pointed out.

So, legally, SSM will lead to legal sibling marriage, parent/child marriage, and multiple person marriage. Because the legal arguments for those will be EXACTLY the same as the legal arguments being made for SSM/

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

Incest isn't a sexual orientation north of the mason dixon.

Finding your spouse, at a family reunion...

That would make someone a redneck.

Imagine the depths of delusion wherein those who come to advocate for men having sex and marrying other men... Denigrating others.

ROFLMNAO!

You can't make this crap up!

 

[PaintMyHouse]

And you feel that by allowing homosexuals to legally have sex... So that they could be accepted as people... And not have to live in the shadows, that this; in your feelings, authorized the perverse among us to define the most critical of all cultural institutions?

Marriage isn't critical. An argument for children can be made, a good one, and monogamy, but not marriage.

 

[HappyJoy]

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

Incest isn't a sexual orientation north of the mason dixon.

Finding your spouse, at a family reunion...

That would make someone a redneck.

Imagine the depths of delusion wherein those who come to advocate for men having sex and marrying other men... Denigrating others.

ROFLMNAO!

You can't make this crap up!

Have you ever had a blow job? I suggest you get one.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Incest is not related to marriage equality. To suggest such is a fallacy.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

and with mother/daughter, father/son, and multiple person "marriages". The libs and gay mafia have no idea what they are opening up

Why does the Right have so little Faith along so little clue and so little Cause? Is Individual Liberty too much of a moral challenge for the Right.

You're a lying POS. There are as many people on the left that piss on gays as there are on the right. The only difference is the left needed the votes in 2008 and some folks on the right are stubborn as hell.

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

Ok OP... We have another Leftist coming to propose that humanity regress and devolve into a lower base animal species.

(Reader... Remember that homosexuality is a
Mental Disorder that presents as sexual deviancy. The call for humanity to devolve into lower animal species, as. a means to help them feel "legitimate " is part and parcel of that mental disorder.)

 

[Dot Com]

And you feel that by allowing homosexuals to legally have sex... So that they could be accepted as people... And not have to live in the shadows, that this; in your feelings, authorized the perverse among us to define the most critical of all cultural institutions?

Marriage isn't critical. An argument for children can be made, a good one, and monogamy, but not marriage.

No. Committed couple's need to receive the same civil rights afforded those married under the auspices of a sky pixie such as hospital visitation, inheritance, etc...

 

[Dot Com]

Incest is not related to marriage equality. To suggest such is a fallacy.

yep, seems he lost the intial debate so he's doing the only thing he can do changing the subject

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

Incest isn't a sexual orientation north of the mason dixon.

Finding your spouse, at a family reunion...

That would make someone a redneck.

Imagine the depths of delusion wherein those who come to advocate for men having sex and marrying other men... Denigrating others.

ROFLMNAO!

You can't make this crap up!

Have you ever had a blow job? I suggest you get one.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

No. Committed couple's need to receive the same civil rights afforded those married under the auspices of a sky pixie such as hospital visitation, inheritance, etc...

That can be done without marriage, just as society can be fine without marriage.

 

[HappyJoy]

Why does the Right have so little Faith along so little clue and so little Cause? Is Individual Liberty too much of a moral challenge for the Right.

You're a lying POS. There are as many people on the left that piss on gays as there are on the right. The only difference is the left needed the votes in 2008 and some folks on the right are stubborn as hell.

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

Ok OP... We have another Leftist coming to propose that humanity regress and devolve into a lower base animal species.

(Reader... Remember that homosexuality is a
Mental Disorder that presents as sexual deviancy. The call for humanity to devolve into lower animal species, as. a means to help them feel "legitimate " is part and parcel of that mental disorder.)

Straight sex occurs in nature too...so, there must be something wrong with it using your argument.

 

[HappyJoy]

Incest isn't a sexual orientation north of the mason dixon.

Finding your spouse, at a family reunion...

That would make someone a redneck.

Imagine the depths of delusion wherein those who come to advocate for men having sex and marrying other men... Denigrating others.

ROFLMNAO!

You can't make this crap up!

Have you ever had a blow job? I suggest you get one.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

So, the answer is no?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Hey Pop, time to fight for tradition, OSSM. I wonder if OSSM.ORG is available?

"The census returns of Roman Egypt, preserved on papyrus, provide quantifiable documentary evidence of brother-sister marriage, mostly for the 2nd and early 3rd centuries AD (Thierfelder 1960; Sidler 1971; Hopkins 1980; Shaw 1992; Scheidel 1996a). At that time, one in five attested couples in Middle Egypt consisted of brothers and sisters (Bagnall and Frier 1994). The incidence of incest in the city of Arsinoe in the Fayum was higher still, indicating that virtually every man with a living younger sister married her instead of someone from outside the family. At that level, this custom must have assumed the function of a cultural norm (Scheidel 1995). Mazdaean (‘Zoroastrian’) religious doctrine, originating from Iran, not only legitimized but encouraged and extolled sexual relations between parents and children and between siblings. The very substantial corpus of pertinent evidence combines prescriptive Zoroastrian texts (mostly from the early Middle Ages) and descriptive accounts by outsiders, ranging from the 5th century BC to the Middle Ages and from western Europe to Tibet and China (West 1882; Spooner 1966; Sidler 1971; Bucci 1978; Frye 1985; Herrenschmidt 1994; Mitterauer 1994; Frandsen 2009). Half-sibling unions are also attested for a number of other societies but have so far eluded systematic investigation (Modrzejewski 1964; Goggin & Sturtevant 1964)."
References

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Incest is not related to marriage equality. To suggest such is a fallacy.

yep, seems he lost the intial debate so he's doing the only thing he can do changing the subject

Incest is EVERYBIT as related to marriage as race is related to behavior.

The only problem in trying to communicate with the
Mentally disordered, is that they use a lot of words that don't mean what they're saying.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Finding your spouse, at a family reunion...

That would make someone a redneck.

Imagine the depths of delusion wherein those who come to advocate for men having sex and marrying other men... Denigrating others.

ROFLMNAO!

You can't make this crap up!

Have you ever had a blow job? I suggest you get one.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

So, the answer is no?

oh! A Re-concession. How sweet...

Your re-comcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[HappyJoy]

Incest is EVERYBIT as related to marriage as race is related to behavior.

Come again?

 

[HappyJoy]

Your re-comcession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

Oh look, your other crutch.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Hey Pop, time to fight for tradition, OSSM. I wonder if OSSM.ORG is available?

"The census returns of Roman Egypt, preserved on papyrus, provide quantifiable documentary evidence of brother-sister marriage, mostly for the 2nd and early 3rd centuries AD (Thierfelder 1960; Sidler 1971; Hopkins 1980; Shaw 1992; Scheidel 1996a). At that time, one in five attested couples in Middle Egypt consisted of brothers and sisters (Bagnall and Frier 1994). The incidence of incest in the city of Arsinoe in the Fayum was higher still, indicating that virtually every man with a living younger sister married her instead of someone from outside the family. At that level, this custom must have assumed the function of a cultural norm (Scheidel 1995). Mazdaean (‘Zoroastrian’) religious doctrine, originating from Iran, not only legitimized but encouraged and extolled sexual relations between parents and children and between siblings. The very substantial corpus of pertinent evidence combines prescriptive Zoroastrian texts (mostly from the early Middle Ages) and descriptive accounts by outsiders, ranging from the 5th century BC to the Middle Ages and from western Europe to Tibet and China (West 1882; Spooner 1966; Sidler 1971; Bucci 1978; Frye 1985; Herrenschmidt 1994; Mitterauer 1994; Frandsen 2009). Half-sibling unions are also attested for a number of other societies but have so far eluded systematic investigation (Modrzejewski 1964; Goggin & Sturtevant 1964)."
References

OP you've got another Leftist on record advocating for humanity regressing back to the understanding common to the 5th century BC.

Proving once again that Progressives are regressive.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

You're a lying POS. There are as many people on the left that piss on gays as there are on the right. The only difference is the left needed the votes in 2008 and some folks on the right are stubborn as hell.

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

Ok OP... We have another Leftist coming to propose that humanity regress and devolve into a lower base animal species.

(Reader... Remember that homosexuality is a
Mental Disorder that presents as sexual deviancy. The call for humanity to devolve into lower animal species, as. a means to help them feel "legitimate " is part and parcel of that mental disorder.)

Straight sex occurs in nature too...so, there must be something wrong with it using your argument.

Animals have no means to know the difference between what is right and wrong. Not at all district from the sub-human element comprising the Ideologic left.