Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA?

[HappyJoy]

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

Ok OP... We have another Leftist coming to propose that humanity regress and devolve into a lower base animal species.

(Reader... Remember that homosexuality is a
Mental Disorder that presents as sexual deviancy. The call for humanity to devolve into lower animal species, as. a means to help them feel "legitimate " is part and parcel of that mental disorder.)

Straight sex occurs in nature too...so, there must be something wrong with it using your argument.

Animals have no means to know the difference between what is right and wrong. Not at all district from the sub-human element comprising the Ideologic left.

Either homosexuality is deviant or it is a natural act demonstrated repeatedly among humans and animals. There is no mainstream organization that condemns homosexuality as being deviant.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The foolish assertion "Incest is EVERYBIT as related to marriage as race is related to behavior" has no quantification and fails alone by lack of common sense.

"Remember that" heterofascism, which ipso facto discounts homosexuality, is carried to the extreme a Mental Disorder.

 

[thanatos144]

A sin is a lie and homosexuality is a sin then homosexual love is a lie

 

[PaintMyHouse]

so, what you are saying is that the dem/libs patronized the gays in order to get their votes and they really don't give a shit about gay marriage. Do the gays know that?

More posts on a gay thread, Red Minnow? Can't quit the topic?

There are quite a few fish who display homosexual behavior in nature.

• Amazon molly[48]
• Bennett
• Blackstripe topminnow[49]
• Bluegill sunfish[49]
• Char[47]
• Grayling[47]
• European bitterling[50]
• Green swordtail[50]
• Guiana leaffish[51]
• Houting whitefish[47]
• Jewel fish[52]
• Least darter (Microperca punctulata)[50]
• Mouthbreeding fish sp.[49]
• Salmon spp.[53]
• Southern platyfish[50]
• Ten-spined stickleback[50]

Ok OP... We have another Leftist coming to propose that humanity regress and devolve into a lower base animal species.

(Reader... Remember that homosexuality is a
Mental Disorder that presents as sexual deviancy. The call for humanity to devolve into lower animal species, as. a means to help them feel "legitimate " is part and parcel of that mental disorder.)

Straight sex occurs in nature too...so, there must be something wrong with it using your argument.

Animals have no means to know the difference between what is right and wrong. Not at all district from the sub-human element comprising the Ideologic left.

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that they don't have morals however your morals are made up, like your God, so, which one is more valid, their behavior, which is true to their nature, or your behavior, which isn't?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A sin is a lie and homosexuality is a sin then homosexual love is a lie

Charging interest was a sin once. I wouldn't go there if I were you. The sins we now call normal day to day life is a very long list.

This BTW, a sin:

 

[Seawytch]

A sin is a lie and homosexuality is a sin then homosexual love is a lie

Hey there cafeteria Christian...are you evenly remotely aware of the "sins" in the NT alone?


The Complete List of SINS New Testament

I wonder how many you've violated...

 

[PaintMyHouse]

A sin is a lie and homosexuality is a sin then homosexual love is a lie

Hey there cafeteria Christian...are you evenly remotely aware of the "sins" in the NT alone?


The Complete List of SINS New Testament

I wonder how many you've violated...

Damn, didn't make it past number one. Think I'll number one while I wait for his response.

 

[Pop23]

gay rights are civil rights. One would think that OP would see the importance of civil rights in this great nation's history.

Do you agree then that those "civil rights should extend to same sex sibling marriage?

is that the subject of the OP? and how did you come up w/ that?

the OP asks if gay marriage is the most important issue facing our nation today. Some of you apparently think it is. the next question is why do you think that?

The discussion has migrated to the what will happen if gay marriage is federally sanctioned, several have made the logical next step to same sex sibling marriage, which would become legal is SSM became legal.

Sibling marriage could be done to reduce income taxes and inheritence taxes. Sex is not a prerequisite to marriage as many of you on the left have pointed out.

So, legally, SSM will lead to legal sibling marriage, parent/child marriage, and multiple person marriage. Because the legal arguments for those will be EXACTLY the same as the legal arguments being made for SSM/

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Do you agree then that those "civil rights should extend to same sex sibling marriage?

is that the subject of the OP? and how did you come up w/ that?

the OP asks if gay marriage is the most important issue facing our nation today. Some of you apparently think it is. the next question is why do you think that?

The discussion has migrated to the what will happen if gay marriage is federally sanctioned, several have made the logical next step to same sex sibling marriage, which would become legal is SSM became legal.

Sibling marriage could be done to reduce income taxes and inheritence taxes. Sex is not a prerequisite to marriage as many of you on the left have pointed out.

So, legally, SSM will lead to legal sibling marriage, parent/child marriage, and multiple person marriage. Because the legal arguments for those will be EXACTLY the same as the legal arguments being made for SSM/

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

You must fix that Pops. Millions of men waiting to marry, and then fuck, their little sisters are counting on you.

OSSM must be legal, now...

 

[Pop23]

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Are fathers and daughters siblings?

Your deflecting

Please clean up when you're done

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Are fathers and daughters siblings?

Your deflecting

Please clean up when you're done

Incest marriage is incest marriage Pops. You must fix this, it's a grave injustice. You supporting only the faggots who are brothers is simply unfair. Don't all people deserve to marry their close relatives?

 

[Pop23]

is that the subject of the OP? and how did you come up w/ that?

the OP asks if gay marriage is the most important issue facing our nation today. Some of you apparently think it is. the next question is why do you think that?

The discussion has migrated to the what will happen if gay marriage is federally sanctioned, several have made the logical next step to same sex sibling marriage, which would become legal is SSM became legal.

Sibling marriage could be done to reduce income taxes and inheritence taxes. Sex is not a prerequisite to marriage as many of you on the left have pointed out.

So, legally, SSM will lead to legal sibling marriage, parent/child marriage, and multiple person marriage. Because the legal arguments for those will be EXACTLY the same as the legal arguments being made for SSM/

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

You must fix that Pops. Millions of men waiting to marry, and then fuck, their little sisters are counting on you.

OSSM must be legal, now...

Try to stay on topic, there will CONTINUE to be a compelling governmental interest in denial of opposing sex, closely related from marriage.

Do you actually want to discuss this legal paradox?

Of course you don't.

 

[Pop23]

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Are fathers and daughters siblings?

Your deflecting

Please clean up when you're done

Incest marriage is incest marriage Pops. You must fix this, it's a grave injustice. You supporting only the faggots who are brothers is simply unfair. Don't all people deserve to marry their close relatives?

Then why does your side argue for it?

 

[PaintMyHouse]

the OP asks if gay marriage is the most important issue facing our nation today. Some of you apparently think it is. the next question is why do you think that?

The discussion has migrated to the what will happen if gay marriage is federally sanctioned, several have made the logical next step to same sex sibling marriage, which would become legal is SSM became legal.

Sibling marriage could be done to reduce income taxes and inheritence taxes. Sex is not a prerequisite to marriage as many of you on the left have pointed out.

So, legally, SSM will lead to legal sibling marriage, parent/child marriage, and multiple person marriage. Because the legal arguments for those will be EXACTLY the same as the legal arguments being made for SSM/

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

You must fix that Pops. Millions of men waiting to marry, and then fuck, their little sisters are counting on you.

OSSM must be legal, now...

Try to stay on topic, there will CONTINUE to be a compelling governmental interest in denial of opposing sex, closely related from marriage.

Do you actually want to discuss this legal paradox?

Of course you don't.

What is this compelling government reason?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Keys and Pop and the rest keep stumbling over each others' feet and arguments.

 

[Pop23]

"next logical step"? Maybe in an eXtreme rw'ers mind. No, your thread title names the subject. Project much

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

You must fix that Pops. Millions of men waiting to marry, and then fuck, their little sisters are counting on you.

OSSM must be legal, now...

Try to stay on topic, there will CONTINUE to be a compelling governmental interest in denial of opposing sex, closely related from marriage.

Do you actually want to discuss this legal paradox?

Of course you don't.

What is this compelling government reason?

The ability to create defective children, just ask world watcher.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Are fathers and daughters siblings?

Your deflecting

Please clean up when you're done

Incest marriage is incest marriage Pops. You must fix this, it's a grave injustice. You supporting only the faggots who are brothers is simply unfair. Don't all people deserve to marry their close relatives?

Then why does your side argue for it?

It is you that is arguing for it. If any two can marry then that means any two eh?

 

[Pop23]

Keys and Pop and the rest keep stumbling over each others' feet and arguments.

And your argument is.

You're a poop head AND

That's icky

 

[PaintMyHouse]

If SSM is legally sanctioned, what legal argument will you bring to prohibit same sex sibling marriage?

True, then the real paradox happens.

Since there is no compelling governmental interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage, but there remains one for opposite sex siblings, our Supreme Court is about to open the door to granting gay Americans greater access to the benefits of marriage than heterosexuals.

A true paradox of epic proportions.

You must fix that Pops. Millions of men waiting to marry, and then fuck, their little sisters are counting on you.

OSSM must be legal, now...

Try to stay on topic, there will CONTINUE to be a compelling governmental interest in denial of opposing sex, closely related from marriage.

Do you actually want to discuss this legal paradox?

Of course you don't.

What is this compelling government reason?

The ability to create defective children, just ask world watcher.

Marriage has nothing to do with that, that's fucking. If no children could be produce by the union then there is no problem. Do continue to try and find a compelling reason.

 

[Pop23]

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Go get 'em Pop, fighter for the oppressed: Teen dad s marriage plan spurs N.J. incest ban effort

Are fathers and daughters siblings?

Your deflecting

Please clean up when you're done

Incest marriage is incest marriage Pops. You must fix this, it's a grave injustice. You supporting only the faggots who are brothers is simply unfair. Don't all people deserve to marry their close relatives?

Then why does your side argue for it?

It is you that is arguing for it. If any two can marry then that means any two eh?

Yep, no compelling government interest in denying them.

Go ahead, express the compelling state interest in denying same sex siblings from marriage.

You won't, you can't.