BuddyColt
Member
- Thread starter
- #361
After 360 posts this thread has gone nowhere beyond the first four postings . If most of you notice, the National Socialists among us have spent hundreds of posts trying to win an argument via the repetition of a lie.
For those who might be here, watching this circus unfold, if you doubt what I said is true, pick up the phone and call any immigration lawyer. Ask them if the disputed statute is civil law or criminal law and whether an IMPROPER ENTRY is a crime.
Despite the best efforts of my critics, they have not come up with one, single, solitary case wherein improper entry equals a crime. Their cited cases were either overturned, were about eluding the authorities (a crime under Title 18) or something along those lines. I have quoted the highest ranking immigration officials in the United States along with cases and proposed legislation testifying against them.
Finally note this:
The National Socialists here have no original ideas of their own. They wait for people like me to present the research and then they suddenly become an expert on the topic, Googling words they find within our research. In short, they don't have anything except an ability to keep repeating the same B.S. over and over.
The straw that broke the camel's back is when that dumb ass came here and misquoted an economist and gave someone else credit for it. I corrected the quote and gave him the correct author and suddenly this guy becomes an expert on Milton Friedman... someone this guy had obviously never heard of before. I know because I study Friedman and apply a lot of his principles in my own life.
This place is a joke and the nazis here are DANGEROUS. LIE Ability and his cheering squad though don't have the balls that the big boys have, but they may very well inspire the next J.T. Ready. If you don't know what I'm talking about, read the first four postings on this thread.
For those who might be here, watching this circus unfold, if you doubt what I said is true, pick up the phone and call any immigration lawyer. Ask them if the disputed statute is civil law or criminal law and whether an IMPROPER ENTRY is a crime.
Despite the best efforts of my critics, they have not come up with one, single, solitary case wherein improper entry equals a crime. Their cited cases were either overturned, were about eluding the authorities (a crime under Title 18) or something along those lines. I have quoted the highest ranking immigration officials in the United States along with cases and proposed legislation testifying against them.
Finally note this:
The National Socialists here have no original ideas of their own. They wait for people like me to present the research and then they suddenly become an expert on the topic, Googling words they find within our research. In short, they don't have anything except an ability to keep repeating the same B.S. over and over.
The straw that broke the camel's back is when that dumb ass came here and misquoted an economist and gave someone else credit for it. I corrected the quote and gave him the correct author and suddenly this guy becomes an expert on Milton Friedman... someone this guy had obviously never heard of before. I know because I study Friedman and apply a lot of his principles in my own life.
This place is a joke and the nazis here are DANGEROUS. LIE Ability and his cheering squad though don't have the balls that the big boys have, but they may very well inspire the next J.T. Ready. If you don't know what I'm talking about, read the first four postings on this thread.