Is Russia Murdering People In the UK Or Have They Lost Control of Their Nerve Agents?

[Weatherman2020]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

 

[Stratford57]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

 

[Weatherman2020]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

That has to be the worst spin anyone has made on USMB this year.

 

[Stratford57]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

That has to be the worst spin anyone has made on USMB this year.

Spin is what UK authorities are making right now. If you use your logic you can understand why.

BTW, where is the evidence? if you pay attention, there is none. Only a lot of noise.

 

[aaronleland]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

That has to be the worst spin anyone has made on USMB this year.

Spin is what UK authorities are making right now. If you use your logic you can understand why.

BTW, where is the evidence? if you pay attention, there is none. Only a lot of noise.

In your attempt to defend Russia you provided all the evidence. The poison is only produced in Russia.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

What happened to Trotsky?

 

[irosie91]

THE RAMIFICATIONS !!!! the use of this substance----a very powerful phophodiesterase inhibitor that can simply be
dropped on a person--------is a HUGE PROBLEM for the opponents of world wide terrorism. YAWN NOT

 

[busybee01]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

The US is not demanding answers. Tillerson was but the Trump statement was wishy washy.

 

[busybee01]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

You are either a fool or a Putin puppet. The reason is simple. They know their boy Trump will take care of them. They can run wild with no consequences.

 

[deanrd]

Nerve agent is something that's just laying around that anyone can make. Something Republicans suddenly realized.
That means, they can wholeheartedly defend the Russians.

 

[Mindful]

Another death.

Counter-terror cops probe death of Russian Nikolai Glushkov in London

 

[badger2]

What the prisoners should have done is firstly not take the sovereignty bait as if UK was the voice of choice. We also noticed the wishy-washy undecidable as to whether it was VX or novichok.



Ás Schmitt underscores in Political Theology, the decision of the sovereign "frees itself from all normative ties and becomes in the true sense absolute." This is necessary for the sovereign to be the one who "definitely decides."beyond the division of power. To be sure, Schmitt has good reason to insist on the indivisible sovereignty of the political decision. If the decision is not sovereign, it is dependent on something other than itself and thus always open to corruption.

For the same reason, if the one who makes the decision can always be questioned -- namely, it it is (always possible [italics]) that he can be wrong -- there is nothing that can safeguard Schmitt's essential distinction. For example, the attack on a purported enemy can always turn out to be an attack on someone who did not in fact threaten the state, and the allegedly "political"killing can never safely be distinguished from a criminal murder.

Indeed, the very possibility of questioning the decision of the sovereign divides its power in advance. Schmitt insists that to prevent such consequences, the sovereign must be the one who "definitely"decides on the state of exception. In contrast, Derrida argues that the structure of decision undercuts the possibility of a "definitive" decision, as well as the possibility of any indivisible sovereignty. If the sovereign is t be authoritative in the sense that Schmitt's theory requires, he has to know who his enemy is and who he himself is in relation to his enemy. But if there were such knowledge, there would be no decision concerning these issues. Rather, the positions of friend and enemy would already be determined by a program and would not require any decision. Inversely, if decisions are necessary, it is because there is no given knowledge, nnot even the "concrete knowledge"or "concrete identification"of the enemy to which Schmitt appeals. While decisions are necessary, they cannot be grounded in the indivisible sovereignty that is required for a "proper"" political decision in Schmitt's sense. Rather, Derrida is "confirming -- but not by way of deploring the fact as Schmitt does -- an essential and necessary depoliticization. " '
(Haegglund, Radical Atheism)

 

[Syriusly]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

It is one or the other.

Given the nature of the attack, its more likely Russia.

No reason for ISIS or the Mossad to target this guy in particular.

 

[Baron]

The most stupid story I heard the last twenty years. U.K. is a dimwitted moron and shall invent something more trustworthy

 

[MrShangles]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

The US is not demanding answers. Tillerson was but the Trump statement was wishy washy.

Why should we worry, the UK gave Putin 24 hours to come clean or else, it’s been about 48 hours, she must be getting really mad by now, maybe she should point a finger sternly at Putin.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Likkmee]

The 1980's called, they want their foreign policy back.

U.S., Britain demand answers from Russia in spy attack

Neither. Russia didn't have ANY reason for murdering any people in UK.

If those victims knew any secrets about Russia they have already told them several years ago (they lived in UK since 2010). Killing them only benefits Russia's enemies: being dead they can harm Russia a lot more than being alive. Especially a week before Presidential elections in Russia (March, 18).

Especially, using the gas "Novichok" which was produced in Russia. Aren't there lots of other poisons which wouldn't attract so much attention to Russia? It's a great headline for a new anti-Russian show for fools: "Russian ex-spy poisoned with the gas produced only in Russia".

P.S Doesn't it look strange that Litwinenko was poisoned with Polonium allegedly brought from Russia and Skripal was poisoned with Novockok also allegedly brought from Russia? Sounds like it perfectly suits somebody's dirty goal to blame Russia for another murder without any evidence.

That has to be the worst spin anyone has made on USMB this year.

Spin is what UK authorities are making right now. If you use your logic you can understand why.

BTW, where is the evidence? if you pay attention, there is none. Only a lot of noise.

In your attempt to defend Russia you provided all the evidence. The poison is only produced in Russia.

Russia and the Great Satan NLC have both lost all sorts of toys and money over the years. Shit disappears.I'm waiting for the missing suitcase nukes....5....4....3....2......