Bullshit, we have the framework of a democratic system in place, of course force is needed when your literally facing another opposing force.. Might as well say capitalism required force to come about.. Oh wait, it did.I advocate democratic socialism in first world countries, in the third world, violence is necessary.I think you're confusing government with socialism. The socialism advacated by 'Socialist' is that of forceable on a redistribution of wealth on a national scale. It never ends well.Socialism is indeed for dummies. The stupidity of advocating for something that has failed time and time again would be.
Name a first world nation that doesn't use social democracy! Name just one nation that doesn't tax its citizens to pave their roads, invest in their children's education, pay their police and have regulations.
There's a difference between pure socialism(marxism, Stalinism, etc) that is truly a centrally planned nationalized economic system and social democracy that is a hybrid that is used by everyone throughout all of civilization.
Like those police you pay for your taxes? Well, you maybe a supporter of social democracy!
Like driving on roads? You maybe a supporter of social democracy!
Like clean water, food, and not seeing most of your country being poorer then shit like in africa??? You might be a supporter of social democracy.
Fact.
I'm not a fucking anarchist
Socialism always requires violence. It's based on the use of force.