Is The Donald this generation's St. John the Baptist?

[Nosmo King]

In 1964 the Republicans nominated a far Right Wing candidate to run against master politician Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater was creamed in the general election. But his mantra of Conservatism took sprout and by 1976, Ronald Reagan was a viable candidate in opposition to his own party's Gerald Ford. The Conservative movement had its hero and in 1980, Reagan won. Some credit Goldwater for his victory and insurgence.

Today's electorate is screaming mad at the establishment and incumbents in both parties. So mad, in fact, they nominates the Czar of Anger~ Donald Trump. His candidacy is as doomed as Goldwater's was in '64. But by self inflicted wounds rather than ideology. Ideology does not seem to be a big part of Trump's campaign or matter that much to his followers.

But can Trump serve in the same capacity as Goldwater? Can he be the harbinger of the next angry candidate with a real chance at winning? If so, who might that candidate be? The Republicans are chockfull of ideologues. Do they have someone who can channel the anger and get a cogent message out to the voters? We shall see.

 

[bodecea]

In 1964 the Republicans nominated a far Right Wing candidate to run against master politician Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater was creamed in the general election. But his mantra of Conservatism took sprout and by 1976, Ronald Reagan was a viable candidate in opposition to his own party's Gerald Ford. The Conservative movement had its hero and in 1980, Reagan won. Some credit Goldwater for his victory and insurgence.

Today's electorate is screaming mad at the establishment and incumbents in both parties. So mad, in fact, they nominates the Czar of Anger~ Donald Trump. His candidacy is as doomed as Goldwater's was in '64. But by self inflicted wounds rather than ideology. Ideology does not seem to be a big part of Trump's campaign or matter that much to his followers.

But can Trump serve in the same capacity as Goldwater? Can he be the harbinger of the next angry candidate with a real chance at winning? If so, who might that candidate be? The Republicans are chockfull of ideologues. Do they have someone who can channel the anger and get a cogent message out to the voters? We shall see.

James O'Keefe.

 

[The Irish Ram]

In 1964 the Republicans nominated a far Right Wing candidate to run against master politician Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater was creamed in the general election. But his mantra of Conservatism took sprout and by 1976, Ronald Reagan was a viable candidate in opposition to his own party's Gerald Ford. The Conservative movement had its hero and in 1980, Reagan won. Some credit Goldwater for his victory and insurgence.

Today's electorate is screaming mad at the establishment and incumbents in both parties. So mad, in fact, they nominates the Czar of Anger~ Donald Trump. His candidacy is as doomed as Goldwater's was in '64. But by self inflicted wounds rather than ideology. Ideology does not seem to be a big part of Trump's campaign or matter that much to his followers.

But can Trump serve in the same capacity as Goldwater? Can he be the harbinger of the next angry candidate with a real chance at winning? If so, who might that candidate be? The Republicans are chockfull of ideologues. Do they have someone who can channel the anger and get a cogent message out to the voters? We shall see.

If Clinton gets in there will be no next election, as we know it. She intends to flood our country with radical Islam, and open borders for people who will vote as they are told. Here is where the trick originated ~ IMMIGRANT VOTES WIN by George Soros.

An illegal immigrant who was tapped by the Hillary Clinton campaign for a new effort to register Latino voters is tied to a multi-million dollar voter registration effort funded by George Soros.

The Clinton campaign announced the “Mi Sueño, Tu Voto”—or “MY DREAM, YOUR VOTE”—program on Sunday. The program uses stories about illegal immigrant children who are prohibited from voting to inspire Latino voters to register and vote against Donald Trump and Republicans, the Associated Press reported.

Astrid Silva, the 28-year-old illegal immigrant who railed against Donald Trump during a prime-time speaking slot at the Democratic National Convention, was featured in the Clinton campaign’s press release announcing the new “Dreamer” effort.

Silva said in the press release that while young illegal immigrants may not have the right to vote, the new effort will “help ensure that our stories are heard and it will send a clear signal to Donald Trump that we cannot be silenced.”

Silva is the organizing director of the Progressives Leadership Alliance of Nevada, a social and environmental justice group that is already involved in a massive campaign to register 400,000 Hispanic voters for the November election. That effort, known as the “Families Fight Back” campaign, is almost entirely funded by liberal billionaire George Soros.
Illegal Immigrant Tapped for Clinton ‘Dreamer’ Campaign Tied to Soros-Funded Voter Effort

^Two things need to be pointed out. Soros is hell bent on keeping control of our White House and our future.
And here is the most important part of the Hillary/Soros connection:
“MY DREAM, YOUR VOTE”
Not the immigrant's dream, not Dreams of Obama and his father (that we stupidly ignored), not a dream for America, but Hillary's dream.
What is Hillary's dream? In her own words:

"My dream is a hemispheric common market, with open trade and open borders,” Clinton says in an excerpt from a speech to Unibanco Itau, a Brazilian bank. “We have to resists protectionism [and] other kinds of barriers to market access and to trade.”

Hillary's dream is no America. That is what we are going to accept or prevent in a few short weeks.

 

[toxicmedia]

In 1964 the Republicans nominated a far Right Wing candidate to run against master politician Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater was creamed in the general election. But his mantra of Conservatism took sprout and by 1976, Ronald Reagan was a viable candidate in opposition to his own party's Gerald Ford. The Conservative movement had its hero and in 1980, Reagan won. Some credit Goldwater for his victory and insurgence.

Today's electorate is screaming mad at the establishment and incumbents in both parties. So mad, in fact, they nominates the Czar of Anger~ Donald Trump. His candidacy is as doomed as Goldwater's was in '64. But by self inflicted wounds rather than ideology. Ideology does not seem to be a big part of Trump's campaign or matter that much to his followers.

But can Trump serve in the same capacity as Goldwater? Can he be the harbinger of the next angry candidate with a real chance at winning? If so, who might that candidate be? The Republicans are chockfull of ideologues. Do they have someone who can channel the anger and get a cogent message out to the voters? We shall see.

Nice try

Goldwater lost largely because if he had won...the country would have had it's 3rd President in 2 years. The nation was still in shock from the Kennedy assassination and nobody was up for change. It was a very different time.

You CANNOT compare Trump with Goldwater.

Goldwater was a part of America's greatest generation.

Trump is part of America's worst generation. The "me" generation

 

[Mac1958]

In 1964 the Republicans nominated a far Right Wing candidate to run against master politician Lyndon Johnson. Goldwater was creamed in the general election. But his mantra of Conservatism took sprout and by 1976, Ronald Reagan was a viable candidate in opposition to his own party's Gerald Ford. The Conservative movement had its hero and in 1980, Reagan won. Some credit Goldwater for his victory and insurgence.

Today's electorate is screaming mad at the establishment and incumbents in both parties. So mad, in fact, they nominates the Czar of Anger~ Donald Trump. His candidacy is as doomed as Goldwater's was in '64. But by self inflicted wounds rather than ideology. Ideology does not seem to be a big part of Trump's campaign or matter that much to his followers.

But can Trump serve in the same capacity as Goldwater? Can he be the harbinger of the next angry candidate with a real chance at winning? If so, who might that candidate be? The Republicans are chockfull of ideologues. Do they have someone who can channel the anger and get a cogent message out to the voters? We shall see.

His fans are going to deny he lost because he's a repulsive candidate, it will be because the system is rigged.

That means they aren't going anywhere, and the anger to which you refer is just going to grow.

I'm getting the feeling we haven't seen the pinnacle of crazy yet.
.