The T
George S. Patton Party
It is. Truth and lies. Non negotiable. NOT governed by agenda. No gray areas. No nuance. But then it always has been this way through history, hasn't it?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You need to pervert the meaning of "right-wing" to write an OP like that
Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
But then YOU must assume truth has an agenda...It doesn't, YOU do...and thus their point. Blind you remain.You need to pervert the meaning of "right-wing" to write an OP like that
Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
You need to pervert the meaning of "right-wing" to write an OP like that
Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
And note he takes his own thread (as honorable as he thought it was), and uses it to trash those he doesn't like? Fly catcher has been nailed again. Good form Frank.Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
I don't buy into your stupid definition of Right Wing. Its a perversion
As good as your intent was with this( for what it's worth department)...Your true intent I think has come to fruition. You sank your own thread.I think the left-right paradigm has become obsolete. The lines blur as one moves to the extreme edges of political activism. If you believe they remain instructive, please offer examples of the beliefs of those on the far right and far left.
I think the left-right paradigm has become obsolete. The lines blur as one moves to the extreme edges of political activism. If you believe they remain instructive, please offer examples of the beliefs of those on the far right and far left.
Using terms such as the right, the left, liberal, conservative is an attempt to stereotype people by putting them in nice little boxes that we can understand, no grey areas, no ambiguity, and no doubts. Labels are used by people who are trying to divide people. However, a person can be a strong supporter of 2nd amendment rights, pro-choice, be completely neutral on gay marriage, support prayer in schools, and believe single payer health insurance is the best option.
^Ditto. Total distraction.I don't know whether or not it is obsolete, but it sure as fuck is annoying...
Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
I don't buy into your stupid definition of Right Wing. Its a perversion
I think the left-right paradigm has become obsolete. The lines blur as one moves to the extreme edges of political activism. If you believe they remain instructive, please offer examples of the beliefs of those on the far right and far left.
The Left wants the government to run their lives cradle to grave, while the right wants to have individual freedom to make our own choices.
Yeah, if you squint real hard they're identical.
Or totally clueless. Which is the case here.
Far right=Sarah Palin
Far left=Shelia Lee Jackson.
See, they're the same!
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
I don't buy into your stupid definition of Right Wing. Its a perversion
No partisan blinders intended or implied...just truth...principles, right and wrong, black and white. SAD you can't see it. And whom is it now that has the blinders on?This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
I don't buy into your stupid definition of Right Wing. Its a perversion
said the Reagan fluffer.Take off your partisan blinders!!!
![]()
![]()
By 'R' I assume you mean Repubican that mirror Democrats?I think the left-right paradigm has become obsolete. The lines blur as one moves to the extreme edges of political activism. If you believe they remain instructive, please offer examples of the beliefs of those on the far right and far left.
The Left wants the government to run their lives cradle to grave, while the right wants to have individual freedom to make our own choices.
Yeah, if you squint real hard they're identical.
That is not 100% true.
There are more individualists in the R wing but many R wingers want to use the state to prevent Americans from using "drugs" and prostitutes, they want to nationalize women's uteri and other ecclesiastical crimes.
The Fourth Amendment has been decimated as a result.
.
By 'R' I assume you mean Repubican that mirror Democrats?The Left wants the government to run their lives cradle to grave, while the right wants to have individual freedom to make our own choices.
Yeah, if you squint real hard they're identical.
That is not 100% true.
There are more individualists in the R wing but many R wingers want to use the state to prevent Americans from using "drugs" and prostitutes, they want to nationalize women's uteri and other ecclesiastical crimes.
The Fourth Amendment has been decimated as a result.
.
Glad my assumption was correct...regarding ASS U Me.By 'R' I assume you mean Repubican that mirror Democrats?That is not 100% true.
There are more individualists in the R wing but many R wingers want to use the state to prevent Americans from using "drugs" and prostitutes, they want to nationalize women's uteri and other ecclesiastical crimes.
The Fourth Amendment has been decimated as a result.
.
Yes, the Surrender Caucus.
.
Sensible. As it should be. Individual all the way...The paradigm isnt relevant to me, personally. But ive got ire for people who tow the imaginary line 100%.
This is why I find you and CrusaderFrank to be ridiculous. Neither of you have the ability to analyze more than two data points at a time, and with two you draw a conclusion.
I don't buy into your stupid definition of Right Wing. Its a perversion
He's never met a conservative before. To him, all conservatives are like David Duke. His knowledge base sucks and his debate skills laughable. I've pwned him more times than I can remember.