aris2chat
Gold Member
- Feb 17, 2012
- 18,678
- 4,687
- 280
aris, you have no idea, do you?
Get on your unicorn and ride on outta here.
funny a unicorn represents purity and clarity of thought
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
aris, you have no idea, do you?
Get on your unicorn and ride on outta here.
If one does not believe gods exist without clear and convincing evidence, one is evidence driven, not a fantasist.Atheists share much in common with religious believers. If one believes god does not exist, without clear and convincing evidence, one is a believer, much like a religionist.
As any believer, deist or anti-deist, knows.funny a unicorn represents purity and clarity of thoughtaris, you have no idea, do you?
Get on your unicorn and ride on outta here.
Nah, you can't prove God does not exist: you have neither the language, nor abstract symols, not empirical data to support the claim. You are a believer.If one does not believe gods exist without clear and convincing evidence, one is evidence driven, not a fantasist.Atheists share much in common with religious believers. If one believes god does not exist, without clear and convincing evidence, one is a believer, much like a religionist.
God doesn't. You're conflating what God wants with what mankind thinks God wants. There's a difference....Now, that's all a bit confusing to me. How can he love us and then punish us in hell for all eternity if we don't obey his laws? Always heard that love is unconditional; why is gods love conditional?....
The Abrahamic religions are similar to this, but not "all religions"......Nearly all religions have three things in common: 1. They believe in a god. 2. Only their religions is right. 3. Fear.....
I definitely believe the lack of evidence of gods' existence is shown by its lack. Feel free to provide evidence of such existence in order to refute my claim. Or concede to being a fantasist.Nah, you can't prove God does not exist:
You can believe as you wish, and that is evidence for your belief. Your belief operates as does a religionist. You are merely an anti-religionist.I definitely believe the lack of evidence of gods' existence is shown by its lack. Feel free to provide evidence of such existence in order to refute my claim. Or concede to being a fantasist.Nah, you can't prove God does not exist:
Every scientist knows absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The bottom line here is no one knows from whence the Universe came. If the science supported the Oscillating Universe theory, then it would be a stronger proof that nothing came before. Since the evidence indicates ours is a one-shot Universe with a definite beginning and a very cold, dead eventual end, then the question remains; What caused the Big Bang?I definitely believe the lack of evidence of gods' existence is shown by its lack. Feel free to provide evidence of such existence in order to refute my claim. Or concede to being a fantasist.Nah, you can't prove God does not exist:
Hoho. Now that's faith based dogma if ever I read it. Lack of evidence equals evidence.Your belief operates as does a religionist.
Correct, it is evidence of lack of evidence. Evidence is that which can be shown, can be made evident. If it cannot be shown, there is no evidence. As in the case of gods' existence, which, without evidence, is fantasy. Like a fairy story.Every scientist knows absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
So to me... "God" is this spiritual energy we connect with. I have no reason to believe it judges you or condemns you or cares about you in any sort of way... it's simply there as a force to guide you on a path that seems to be inclined toward light and away from dark... toward goodness and away from evil. I don't believe in religions but I have no animosity toward them because at least these people (for the most part) are practicing and exercising spiritual awareness of some kind. I think humanity will forever be better off for that and wouldn't want to see a world devoid of it.
Of course no one knows. That's no excuse to fill the gap in knowledge with the god of gaps.Scientifically answer this question with proof and I'll accept it. Until then, will you accept no one knows?:
1) Disagreed staunch atheists aren't religious. The only logical point of view is agnosticism.Hoho. Now that's faith based dogma if ever I read it. Lack of evidence equals evidence.Your belief operates as does a religionist.
Filling it with God reigning fire on Sodom is one thing. Believing there are powers beyond our understanding and an all encompassing power that unites the Universe is another.Of course no one knows. That's no excuse to fill it with the god of gaps.Scientifically answer this question with proof and I'll accept it. Until then, will you accept no one knows?:
edit...science does not do proof, it does evidence and consensus. I cannot scientifically prove any theory.
Is There A God?
Yes, and he just answered a lot of prayers Tuesday, reinforcing my faith even more.
Every scientist knows that empirical data does not exist to refute or proved the existence of God.Every scientist knows absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. The bottom line here is no one knows from whence the Universe came. If the science supported the Oscillating Universe theory, then it would be a stronger proof that nothing came before. Since the evidence indicates ours is a one-shot Universe with a definite beginning and a very cold, dead eventual end, then the question remains; What caused the Big Bang?I definitely believe the lack of evidence of gods' existence is shown by its lack. Feel free to provide evidence of such existence in order to refute my claim. Or concede to being a fantasist.Nah, you can't prove God does not exist:
Scientifically answer this question with proof and I'll accept it. Until then, will you accept no one knows?:
In your opinion, I guess.Of course no one knows. That's no excuse to fill the gap in knowledge with the god of gaps.Scientifically answer this question with proof and I'll accept it. Until then, will you accept no one knows?:
edit...science does not do proof, it does evidence and consensus. I cannot scientifically prove any theory.
No, that's Jake's logic. In my logic a lack of evidence you are a rapist and thief means there is no evidence you are a rapist and thief.By your logic, a lack of evidence you are a rapist and thief makes you a rapist and thief
Which bit?In your opinion, I guess.