Isn't it safe to say that the rightwing ideology of the present day is just belief in stereotypes?

[JimBowie1958]

I'd be happy to edit your future posts...but if you really want to impress I'd suggest you pick up a copy of The Elements of Style by Strunk & White.

Old Style, I'm sure if Billy wanted any lip off you he'd scrape it off his pecker.

 

[Billy000]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

 

[Oldstyle]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

 

[Oldstyle]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Now there you go again, Billy! "Actually that doesn't at all say anything..."? That's like fingernails on a chalkboard! How about we do "That doesn't say anything..." instead. Much better...

 

[Oldstyle]

I'd be happy to edit your future posts...but if you really want to impress I'd suggest you pick up a copy of The Elements of Style by Strunk & White.

Old Style, I'm sure if Billy wanted any lip off you he'd scrape it off his pecker.

Gee, I haven't heard a snappy dig like that, Jim...since I was in Junior High! I hate to break this to you but it wouldn't have bothered me then and it REALLY doesn't bother me now!

 

[TemplarKormac]

I really think that RWs' faith in republicans is just rooted in stereotypical generalizations about the leftwing in comparison. Now, there is some truth to any stereotype, but the problem with stereotypes is that they cause people to think in unrealistic generalizations and misunderstand reality.

Below is a list of stupid liberal stereotypes that the RW has about the left. They alone fuel the inclination for people to vote republican. The automatic reaction by the right believing these stereotypes is favoring republicans because they think these stereotypes represent reality.
It's not like like republicans can actually think of policies they think will benefit the nation as a whole.

Again I will say that I think there is some truth in a couple of these, but the issue is realizing it is unfair and stupid to generalize these subjects.

1) Liberals think every everyone should not work and just live off the government.

2) The poor are simply lazy.

3) Liberals want to abolish the 2nd amendment.

4) Only conservatives support capitalism.

5) Liberals want communism/totalitarianism/fascism/socialism

6) Liberals want everyone to be paid the same.

7) Liberals think Obama is the best president ever.

8) Liberals are too politically correct.

9) USMB liberals love everything Rdean has to say.

Just a few questions...

When a liberal calls other conservatives racist for criticizing Obama or BLM, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who believes in traditional marriage a bigot or a hater, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls a father of two little girls paranoid for not wanting transgendered women to use the same bathroom/locker room his daughters paranoid, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who is pro-life a misogynist, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who owns a gun legally a 'gun nut', don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls into question the intelligence of anyone who supports Donald Trump, don't you think that's a stereotype?

Do you even know what the word means? Do you know how much damage stereotypes do? No wonder we have so much division in America these days. Nobody uses a fucking dictionary anymore...

 

[Dragonlady]

Can you elaborate further? What issues seperate the liberals from the Marxists?

1. Marxists do not believe in democratic processes unless they control them. Liberals allow for opposition organizations.

2. Marxists do not believe that their opposition has legitimate rights to oppose them, liberals do.

3. Liberals are fond of the rugged individual and have little problem with competition. Marxists abhor competition.

4. Marxists want to destabilize society by any means possible to bring about anarchy so they can impose the Dictatorship of the Proletariate. Liberals want gradual improvement without tearing down all other institutions in society.

5. Liberals are cool dudes while Marxists are dicks.

That covers 99% of it.

I would add that Marxists are opposed to religion and ban it, while most liberals are people of faith, and/or believe in freedom of religion.

 

[TemplarKormac]

while most liberals are people of faith

Wow. I would be interested to see how you back that up. If so, their faith is a title, not deeply held whatsoever. I'm not saying all of them are, but a lot of them claim faith and then use it to justify things their faith doesn't teach

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Hmmm

In a nutshell, liberals of the modern definition want to be taken care of on someone else's dime.

That is a stereotype of their own making.

No that is false. It really is.

No, it really isn't.

 

[Dragonlady]

while most liberals are people of faith

Wow. I would be interested to see how you back that up. If so, their faith is a title, not deeply held whatsoever. I'm not saying all of them are, but a lot of them claim faith and then use it to justify things their faith doesn't teach

Such as?

 

[Billy000]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

You know I'm right.

 

[TemplarKormac]

while most liberals are people of faith

Wow. I would be interested to see how you back that up. If so, their faith is a title, not deeply held whatsoever. I'm not saying all of them are, but a lot of them claim faith and then use it to justify things their faith doesn't teach

Such as?

Transgender bathrooms one, gay marriage two, abortion three.... I could go on.

 

[TemplarKormac]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

You know I'm right.

I doubt it. Jedi mind tricks don't work on me, only proper sentence structure.

 

[Billy000]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Now there you go again, Billy! "Actually that doesn't at all say anything..."? That's like fingernails on a chalkboard! How about we do "That doesn't say anything..." instead. Much better...

Lol you're such a dumbass. We Both know you're just making shit up as you go along.

 

[Billy000]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

You know I'm right.

I doubt it. Jedi mind tricks don't work on me, only proper sentence structure.

Oh really? Besides my lack of commas, what makes it "improper"?

 

[TemplarKormac]

7) Liberals think Obama is the best president ever.

Wait...there are liberals who think he isn't the best president ever. That I will have to see proof of.

Me, and (likely) most liberals on this board don't think that.

Come again?

Obama Job Approval - Democrats - Polls - HuffPost Pollster

 

[TemplarKormac]

"Well way to go you, Oldstyle, for forming a coherent thought."

It's an awkward phrasing, Billy...you need to drop either the you or the Oldstyle...having them both makes no sense and kills the flow of the sentence. You also either need to drop the Well from the beginning or put a comma after it. I dropped it because brevity is usually the way to go.

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

You know I'm right.

I doubt it. Jedi mind tricks don't work on me, only proper sentence structure.

Oh really? Besides my lack of commas, what makes it "improper"?

Ohhh, you meant your argument. Right. I believe I already addressed that. Your prose is simply terrible.

 

[Billy000]

Actually that doesn't at all say anything about the coherency of the sentence. You apparently don't understand the actual defintion of the word. Also, the "you" isn't redundancy. It is using the emphasis of "you" in normal speech when I am singling you out. And even if it was redundant, it wouldn't make the sentence incoherent.

Elements of Style, Billy! Buy it...read it...use it!!!

You know I'm right.

I doubt it. Jedi mind tricks don't work on me, only proper sentence structure.

Oh really? Besides my lack of commas, what makes it "improper"?

Ohhh, you meant your argument. Right. I believe I already addressed that. Your prose is simply terrible.

No, you're just trying to sound smart when we both know you aren't.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No, you're just trying to sound smart when we both know you aren't.

Hence the subject of your thread, "RW's are stupid, and I am not." Come to think of it, aren't all of your threads that way? You continually stereotype people on the right any way you can, which makes you a colossal hypocrite, and you insult the intelligence of everyone who reads and disagrees with your posts.

"There are none so blind as those who will not see."

 

[Billy000]

I really think that RWs' faith in republicans is just rooted in stereotypical generalizations about the leftwing in comparison. Now, there is some truth to any stereotype, but the problem with stereotypes is that they cause people to think in unrealistic generalizations and misunderstand reality.

Below is a list of stupid liberal stereotypes that the RW has about the left. They alone fuel the inclination for people to vote republican. The automatic reaction by the right believing these stereotypes is favoring republicans because they think these stereotypes represent reality.
It's not like like republicans can actually think of policies they think will benefit the nation as a whole.

Again I will say that I think there is some truth in a couple of these, but the issue is realizing it is unfair and stupid to generalize these subjects.

1) Liberals think every everyone should not work and just live off the government.

2) The poor are simply lazy.

3) Liberals want to abolish the 2nd amendment.

4) Only conservatives support capitalism.

5) Liberals want communism/totalitarianism/fascism/socialism

6) Liberals want everyone to be paid the same.

7) Liberals think Obama is the best president ever.

8) Liberals are too politically correct.

9) USMB liberals love everything Rdean has to say.

Just a few questions...

When a liberal calls other conservatives racist for criticizing Obama or BLM, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who believes in traditional marriage a bigot or a hater, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls a father of two little girls paranoid for not wanting transgendered women to use the same bathroom/locker room his daughters paranoid, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who is pro-life a misogynist, don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls someone who owns a gun legally a 'gun nut', don't you think that's a stereotype?

When a liberal calls into question the intelligence of anyone who supports Donald Trump, don't you think that's a stereotype?

Do you even know what the word means? Do you know how much damage stereotypes do? No wonder we have so much division in America these days. Nobody uses a fucking dictionary anymore...

Liberals don't call conservatives racist for criticizing Obama for any reason. You're just making shit up.

Everyone "believes in traditional marriage" you dumbass. Not accepting gay marriage makes you a bigot.

No, because transgendered have always used the bathrooms they wanted to and it's stupid to associate them with pedophiles, you dumb piece of shit.

No liberal I know thinks someone is inherently a misogynist for being pro life.

No because liberals don't think anyone who owns a gun is "a gun nut".

No, that's just a fact.