Israel attacks civilians

[docmauser1]

The line around Gaza is an armistice line not a border.

Whatevah.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Clearly Israel isn't occupying Gaza, so Gazans have no right to attack Jews in Gaza (and there aren't any).
Explain what gives the Gazans the right to attack civilians in Israel?
And thanks for the link, now just cut and paste the part that says it's okay.

There are Jews in Gaza all the time and they are never attacked.

Where is in Israel? there is no border between Gaza and Israel.

I did. You need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

FYI: There are literally hundreds of maps online showing a border between Gaza and Israel. This is only one of them:

You will notice that the so called border is an armistice. Armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

There are Jews in Gaza all the time and they are never attacked.

Where is in Israel? there is no border between Gaza and Israel.

I did. You need to brush up on your reading comprehension.

FYI: There are literally hundreds of maps online showing a border between Gaza and Israel. This is only one of them:

You will notice that the so called border is an armistice. Armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Your map says Israeli occupied. That is no longer the case.

 

[P F Tinmore]

FYI: There are literally hundreds of maps online showing a border between Gaza and Israel. This is only one of them:

You will notice that the so called border is an armistice. Armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Your map says Israeli occupied. That is no longer the case.

Does not change the armistice line.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You will notice that the so called border is an armistice. Armistice lines were specifically not to be political or territorial borders.

Your map says Israeli occupied. That is no longer the case.

Does not change the armistice line.

If Israel doesn't occupy it any more, why doesn't it become a border?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Your map says Israeli occupied. That is no longer the case.

Does not change the armistice line.

If Israel doesn't occupy it any more, why doesn't it become a border?

The armistice line around Gaza was a line drawn inside Palestine that Israeli and Egyptian forces were not to cross.

I don't see where it has any relevance at all now that there are no Egyptian forces in Gaza.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Does not change the armistice line.

If Israel doesn't occupy it any more, why doesn't it become a border?

The armistice line around Gaza was a line drawn inside Palestine that Israeli and Egyptian forces were not to cross.

I don't see where it has any relevance at all now that there are no Egyptian forces in Gaza.

Didn't Israel cross it in 1967?

 

[P F Tinmore]

If Israel doesn't occupy it any more, why doesn't it become a border?

The armistice line around Gaza was a line drawn inside Palestine that Israeli and Egyptian forces were not to cross.

I don't see where it has any relevance at all now that there are no Egyptian forces in Gaza.

Didn't Israel cross it in 1967?

And in the '50s too.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The armistice line around Gaza was a line drawn inside Palestine that Israeli and Egyptian forces were not to cross.

I don't see where it has any relevance at all now that there are no Egyptian forces in Gaza.

Didn't Israel cross it in 1967?

And in the '50s too.

Still no luck justifying attacks on Israeli civilians in the GC?

 

[Lipush]

Didn't Israel cross it in 1967?

And in the '50s too.

Still no luck justifying attacks on Israeli civilians in the GC?

Apperenly there is no such thing as an "Israeli civilian"

 

[P F Tinmore]

And in the '50s too.

Still no luck justifying attacks on Israeli civilians in the GC?

Apperenly there is no such thing as an "Israeli civilian"

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

 

[Lipush]

Still no luck justifying attacks on Israeli civilians in the GC?

Apperenly there is no such thing as an "Israeli civilian"

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

I was being cynical

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Still no luck justifying attacks on Israeli civilians in the GC?

Apperenly there is no such thing as an "Israeli civilian"

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

That is false, I've looked it up.

You should do the same.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Apperenly there is no such thing as an "Israeli civilian"

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

That is false, I've looked it up.

You should do the same.

Did that. The nationals of an occupying power are not protected persons, commonly known as civilians.

 

[Lipush]

specific link please

 

[freedombecki]

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

That is false, I've looked it up.

You should do the same.

Did that. The nationals of an occupying power are not protected persons, commonly known as civilians.

It's a border. Respect it or pay the price.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

That is true. Look it up in the Geneva Conventions.

That is false, I've looked it up.

You should do the same.

Did that. The nationals of an occupying power are not protected persons, commonly known as civilians.

Israel isn't occupying Gaza.

Try again?

 

[P F Tinmore]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

 

[Hossfly]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

While you're in a linking mood, show us the official map of Palestine as of today, 28.5.2012.

 

[Lipush]

specific link please

B. -- ' In occupied territories; ' protection is accorded to all persons who are not of the nationality of the occupying State.

International Humanitarian Law - Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention

I'm searching for the words "not civilians" and "it's ok to shoot at them".

Can't find it.