Israel's War Against Hamas - Updates

Part 1

Editor’s note: This essay is excerpted from letters the author has written daily since the beginning of the Hamas pogrom.

We, Jews in the exile, knew that we were not safe.

Christians could complain to the Christian authorities and Jews would be drained of their wealth and then imprisoned or expelled. At times, it suited the Christian rulers to allow their Christian subjects to “riot,” that is, to enter Jewish homes and to rob, rape, and kill Jews at will, with no punishment by the rulers. There are heart-rending scenes depicted in Jewish poetry and prose—of women raped in the presence of their children and husbands; of children torn apart alive; of slit throats of children and parents in the presence of each other, of whole communities enclosed in synagogues and then burned alive. It didn’t happen every day, or even every year. But it happened every once in a while. The word was “pogrom” and it meant a riot by Christians, the purpose of which was to kill Jews, in the cruelest ways, with the quiet sanction of the state.

To be sure, living in a society that preached that Jews were Christ-killers, demons, and sorcerers, the source of the plagues that killed large percentages of the population, and so on, ensured that Jews would be a target. Christian education and preaching prepared the masses for the murder of the Jews. Jews in Christendom knew they were not safe.

Jews in Muslim lands were not much better off. There are searing narratives and poems that describe what it was like living in a society that forced Jews to cross the street when they encountered a Muslim; that did not allow public celebration of Jewish holidays; that made Jews pay a poll tax and get beaten publicly when they did; that invented the idea of special Jewish garb to single out Jews; that allowed Muslims to seize Jewish orphans and raise them as Muslims; that punished Jews for assaulting Muslims but not Muslims for assaulting Jews; and more. And then, there were the “riots” in which the masses were allowed, even encouraged, to roam through the Jewish community, raping, killing, torturing, and humiliating the Jews of all ages and genders.

The riots didn’t happen every day, or even every year. But they happened every once in a while, and became part of Jewish reality. The word was “sin’ut,” Jew hatred, and it meant the long-term humiliation of Jews, mixed with the sporadic violent murder of Jews. To be sure, living in a Muslim society that preached that Jews were deniers, apes and pigs, dishonest, greedy, and sources of illness, ensured that Jews would be a target. Muslim education and preaching prepared the masses for the murder of the Jews. Jews in Islamic lands knew they were not safe.

Then, came the Enlightenment with the idea that humans are alike. “Liberty, equality, and fraternity.” “All men are created equal.” It wasn’t true. Women were excluded. Blacks were excluded. So were Jews. But, it was a dream which, very slowly, was extended until the declaration of human rights was understood to be universal.

European and American Jews were glad to live in the Enlightenment. There were still remnants of the old regime and they were called “antisemitic,” but we, Jews, believed them to be remnants of medieval Christendom that would fade away in the Enlightenment. The problem was that antisemitism had very deep roots in western culture and religion and, in their enthusiasm for the Enlightenment, the Jews of Europe forgot those roots. In time, the forces of deep Jew hatred reared their heads, and secular modernity also turned against the Jews. Jews were hated because they were Jews, again: greedy for world power, the source of the loss of the old traditional values, vermin, an inferior race, modern Antichrists. That resulted in the Holocaust, an almost-successful, systematic, mechanized, state-sponsored effort to annihilate all the Jews in Europe. The education of the populace by these forces, especially in the Nazi and communist states, prepared the masses for the murder of the Jews. Jews in the modern world learned that they were not safe.

The Enlightenment never came to the lands of Islam—not for the Jews, not for women, and not for others. Modern technology came, but not the Enlightenment. Rather, modern Islam borrowed the “antisemitism” of the Christian modern world, added it to Islamic antisemitism, and began to educate Muslims to murder Jews in the modern spirit and way.

The Jews responded to Christian, secular, and Muslim Jew hatred by creating their own state. It was to be a place where Jews could live without pogroms and sin’ut, where Jews could breathe freely. At first, Jews moved to the Holy Land and settled there with their own self-government. Then, they established their own state with the purpose of making it into a place where they could live without fear of pogroms and sin’ut. They had to fight for it. Many died, but it was worth it. They were free to live, to work, even to quarrel with one another. There were occasional incursions of Muslims and wars with them, but the Muslims were fought off. We paid a price, but we thought we were safe—even to have mass protests against our own government. We knew that the Muslims hated us, but we held that at a distance and, when their hatred of us, welled up, we responded. A stalemate, but a livable one.



 
Part 2

The “Hamas pogrom” changed all that. The invaders were of two sorts: untrained invaders who came across the border on motorcycles, bicycles, and even on foot. Their job was to kill, or take as hostages, as many people as they could, and then retreat into Gaza. They did this well. The other sort were trained special forces who were heavily armed. Their job was to invade communities and military bases, kill and seize hostages and equipment, and then move farther into Israel. Some of them stole Israeli cars, police and army uniforms from the dead, weapons, ID cards, etc. If needed, they had contacts in the local Palestinian community who will hide them. Some of these terrorists are still on the loose, which is why all apartment doors have to be locked and one never opens a door to anyone.

Suddenly, here were the Muslim masses overrunning Jewish villages and murdering Jews in their sleep, tearing babies apart, raping women, seizing the elderly, dragging our soldiers out of tanks and abusing them, burning whole families in their homes, and then putting up videos of all this, bragging to the world of what they had done. And the Islamic world saw this as a victory, and celebrated it. The old Christian and antisemitic secular worlds were quick to join in, celebrating the slaughter of Jews and blaming Israel for it all.

True, the Enlightenment world did rally, at least in words. Even minute segments of the Islamic world that understood the Enlightenment condemned the sin’ut. But, it was too late. We, Jews, learned from the Hamas pogrom that even in the land that we thought was more or less safe, we have been subject to a pogrom. We learned that even in the State of Israel, we are not safe. We also know, deep down inside, that it could happen again. We will strike back this time, but the reality of the resurgence of Jew-hatred even in the Jewish state is now upon us.

It is actually worse than that. The success of the Hamas pogrom has reinforced Jew haters everywhere. Their hand has been strengthened by the Hamas pogrom. What will happen when the Jew haters in the U.S., Britain, France, South America, Germany, Poland, Russia, and elsewhere realize their power?

Sin’ut is a worldwide phenomenon with worldwide communication and funding. Many of the non-Muslims are still in the shadows, but they won’t stay there long. Word of Hamas’ victory will spread, as the blood libel that began in England during the Crusades spread, igniting Jew hatred everywhere. The right-wing Jew haters, the left-wing Jew haters, and the Christian Jew haters will join the Muslim Jew haters. Modern media will make this possible. After the Hamas pogrom, Jews are no longer safe anywhere. My European daughter-in-law says: “This feels like Brussels.” We have reports from Texas that groups of Palestinians are turning up at gun ranges, learning how to shoot, and then buying guns. There are times when I feel that I am in a nightmare, one of those that makes you wake up trembling but, in the end, you know it isn’t true. This, however, is no nightmare. It is our reality.

Therefore, a few words of advice: First, know that it is OK to be angry. It is OK to be outraged. Westerners have a tendency to be stiff-upper-lipped. Don’t be that Westerner. If you run across a university president or a religious or political leader who is not outraged enough, call them out on it. Don’t be shy. Second, know that it is OK to cry. Some things require tears. A person who does not cry is not quite human. Third, do pray even if it is not your usual custom and even if you don’t believe, or are not sure of what you believe. Prayer, that is, turning to a Presence that is beyond us, is natural. Just say what comes from your heart. It doesn’t hurt, really.



 
Part 3

Yesterday, my son Philippe went to see an older colleague who is one of the academic experts on Hamas. He has had a stroke and can no longer go out. I know him too and have read his book. He lives in Tel Aviv. Normally, I would have gone along, but no one needs an old man with a suprapubic catheter tagging along and I did not want to leave my wife alone. So, I did not go. Then, Philippe went to see an old woman, a famous European businesswoman whose family fled here after Kristallnacht (1938). She, too, lives in Tel Aviv. It turns out that her Thai helper lost two people in the south: one who was killed and the other who is one of the known Thai hostages.

Then, Philippe went to two military funerals in the local cemetery. The first one was delayed because the coffin had been sent to the wrong place. So everyone had to wait, including the group for the second funeral. In Israel, bodies are buried in shrouds. If a coffin is used, it means the body has been severely mutilated. Both funerals were with coffins. Normally, at a military funeral, the commanding officer speaks. In these funerals, one commanding officer had been killed and the other is on the front line.

In one funeral, the deceased was a 23-year-old girl. In the other, the deceased was a 19-year-old girl who had just finished her training as an observer (these are the young women who watch the electronic cameras and pass on any dangerous information they gather). The Hamas terrorists carefully shot out the cameras, bombed the communications tower, and attacked the observation tower, raping, abusing, and killing these girls. She was one of those killed, from a Yemenite family of the community of my daughter-in-law Nili’s parents.

Philippe remarked that you could feel the anger in the crowd of hundreds gathered for these funerals. Yes, they are angry, and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and the Israeli commentators reflect this anger, promising a long war that will “eliminate” Hamas in Gaza—not Gazans or Muslims or Arabs, but Hamas. Upon objective reflection, such a goal seems hardly possible. In the long run, it would be useless because others will rise and take their place. Still, the Jewish anger is there. The more we read, the more we, too, feel that anger.

Many years ago, when I was about to write the concluding chapters of Facing the Abusing God: A Theology of Protest, I fell physically sick for several days. I’m beginning to feel like that now. There are a lot of Hamas documents that have been recovered showing that killing civilians was the major goal and taking hostages next, plus a guide for how to take hostages. One article reports a document on how to torture hostages. American senators were forced to go to shelters because of rockets and a session of the Israeli parliament was suspended for 40 minutes for the same reason. Pro-Hamas demonstrations are multiplying all over the world. Antisemitic incidents are also multiplying all over the world. The Times of Israel and the Jerusalem Post are dedicating space to photos and write-ups of known hostages and victims.

We went to the mourners’ services again this morning. The boy was 28 years old. He was in charge of the outgoing shift at the Sderot police station. He sent home two men early and, as the next shift arrived, he saw the attackers arriving. He warned the new shift to run away because they did not have the necessary heavy arms to fight, only pistols. He then engaged the enemy to cover their retreat.

One woman still in the station fled to the roof. She was shot in the hand. So, she smeared the blood on her face and played dead. She survived. Another policeman hid in a shaft for seven hours until help arrived. Our young policeman and about a dozen others were killed.

From the porch of Philippe’s apartment, Ursula can hear the afternoon service from the parking lot next door. It is very moving.



 
Part 4

Everyone agrees that this was a pogrom, a successful mass-killing of Jews, the worst since the Holocaust. The last tally shows: 1,300 Jews killed, 3,300 Jews injured, many of them seriously, and over 200 Jews and others taken as hostages. The Israelis have retaliated, killing uncounted numbers of Hamas and Palestinians, and reducing large parts of Gaza to rubble.

Now, the real war has begun. It is a second war—a war of words, blackmail, and standing in the world. It is the midgame battle in a larger chess game.

Israel, with the backing of many Jews and others worldwide, wants to “eliminate” Hamas. This cannot actually be done because there are too many Hamas members and way too many Hamas believers, and because this would require a ground invasion that would cost many more Jewish lives. There are also the hostages to take into consideration, including those of Israel’s closest ally, the United States. Nonetheless, after the Holocaust and “Never Again,” the Jewish state, representing dead and living Jews, must make the price of killing Jews with the cruelty that only Jew hatred can evoke as high as possible. The world of Jew haters must know that any such action will evoke a very, very serious response in kind. Jew haters must learn that we will fight back, that we will punish severely such action against us, no matter what the price.

The Jew-hating world wants to recuperate as much as possible and to go on to plan the next step in the war against the Jews. They have two pieces to bargain with: the hostages and the devastation of what they present as innocent civilians whom the West, but not Islam, regard as precious. The center of this movement is Iran. It is the leader of the anti-Western and anti-Jewish world. Iran’s leadership of this jihad is at stake. To win this midgame battle is to lose a few Palestinian pieces but to be able to advance to the next move toward an ultimate win. The rest of the Islamic world knows this well and is watching very, very carefully. So are the Jew haters in the West, on both the left and the right.

America has reason to be a loyal ally of the only democracy in the Middle East. This would restore America as the leader of the Western world and the Western values of human rights, especially after decades of defeats in the Middle East. The return to this position of power is politically crucial for America’s leadership in the South China Sea, in the Middle East, and in Europe. Japan, Korea, Australia, Ukraine, NATO, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, and others are watching very carefully.

So what comes next?

Israel can occupy the Gaza Strip. The Americans, who have long experience with the futility of such occupations, argue (correctly, I think) that such an occupation will not work. Israel could invade the Gaza Strip, destroy as much as possible of the Hamas personnel and infrastructure, and then withdraw. But, the world of bleeding hearts and the world of Islamic solidarity will pour in enough money to rebuild that human and military infrastructure as well as the ideology of Jew hatred that motivates it.

The Americans could intimidate Iran and its proxies into refraining from intervening. That would result in a “check,” but not a “checkmate.” The Iranian Jew haters will then do what any chess player would do. They will strategically withdraw, and the dead Gazans will be declared martyrs who go to paradise while the surviving Gazans will be declared heroes who will live to fight again. The Iranians will then declare victory in a serious and successful preliminary battle. Make no mistake: This would indeed be a victory for Iran, and a major loss for the Americans and the Jews.

In the process, much fuss will be made over “freeing the hostages.” The price demanded for freeing the innocent people who were unjustly seized will be high. There will be no justice; only bargaining over what the losers should pay for the lives of the women, children, grandmothers, strangers working in the Holy Land, and soldiers to “free” them, or their dead bodies. Not all of them will be released. Hamas is already claiming that they do not know where all of them are. Whatever is agreed upon, no matter how unjust, the payment is a victory for the Jew haters. It is blackmail paid.

The reinforcement of the jihad against the Jews (and also against the Christians though Christians don’t take this seriously, yet) will have the secondary effect of being the death of the “two-state solution.” Why, after a great victory against the Jews, should the forces of Islamic antisemitism agree to a Palestinian state that would imply the recognition of the legitimacy of the despised Jewish state? The West will continue to “push” for the two-state solution but the success of the Hamas pogrom has torpedoed that forever. For that matter, what Jew would ever trust a Jew hater to agree to “peace”?

For the same reasons, the success of the jihad against the Jews probably means the end to “normalization.” Who leads the Islamic world? If Iran wins the midgame chess battle by taking its Palestinian losses and withdrawing from further military action until the next move, Iran, not the United Arab Emirates and others, will be the leader, and normalization will have been an interlude.

Antisemitism, on the right and on the left, will grow. It is already spreading rapidly, particularly on college campuses. Sometimes, antisemitism is violent Jew hatred, and sometimes it is couched in equity, diversity, inclusion language which shrinks from declaring the killing of babies a crime against humanity.

There is a concept called “moral injury” that we discovered among American soldiers returning from wars in the Middle East and Asia. It is not PTSD, for which there are established treatment protocols. Moral injury is the realization that one did something in a wartime situation in which the morality of the military protects one psychologically but which, when one returns to normal moral life as civilians, one realizes was terribly wrong. For instance: A soldier in the Middle East sees a pregnant-looking woman dressed in Islamic clothing walking toward him. He does not know whether she is pregnant or has a bomb under her clothing. He shouts at her several times in the local language to stop. He fires into the air to deter her. But she keeps coming toward him. In the end, he follows standard instructions to protect himself and his unit, and he kills her. But she turns out to have been pregnant, and not a terrorist. After release from the army, he returns home and sees his pregnant wife walking toward him. The scene comes back to him and the soldier turns violent, or turns to drugs or alcohol, or commits suicide. This is “moral injury.” He did what he should have done in the situation but, in a normal context, he realizes it was a terribly wrong thing to have done. I think that, for many Israelis and Jews, the anger, indeed the rage, that we are experiencing now and our intense desire for revenge as we read the stories and watch the videos of this horror, are going to become moral injuries as life moves forward.

Finally, remember that 2033 is the 100th anniversary of the rise to power of Hitler; that 2038 is the 100th anniversary of Kristallnacht; and that 2041-44 is the 100th anniversary of the Nazi death camps. The Jew haters know this, for sure. I won’t be around to see this. Many of you won’t either. But our children and grandchildren will.

In the end, it is my thinking that Iran will play it rationally. They will not risk nuclear war for Palestine. They will, therefore, take their Palestinian losses, restrain Hezbollah and other pawns from intervening, declare victory, and return to planning the next major step in their jihad against Jews, Christians, and the West. Israel will do something in Gaza but will not be able to “eliminate” Hamas or Islamic Jew hatred. Hamas will suffer, will declare victory over the Jews, and will succeed in getting more money to rebuild. America will claim to have prevented another damaging war and will go on believing that it leads the free world in its march for justice and peace. Jews everywhere will grudgingly be forced to acknowledge that “there is nothing new under the sun”; that Jew hatred is here to stay. The Hamas pogrom will take its place, alongside other pogroms against Jews, as the first pogrom of the 21st century. Welcome to Jewish history.




 
[Ghazi Hamad makes it clear. There is no Palestine or the Palestinian people. The land is an Arab, Islamic land. Unfortunately, some Jews are still falling for the Palestinian narrative ]

If you’re wondering why so many Jews, from left to right, have such a short fuse lately, look no further than Ghazi Hamad, a Hamas leader with an affinity for clarity.

“Israel is a country that has no place on our land,” Hamad said in an interview with Lebanese TV that has blown up on social media. “We must remove it because it constitutes a security, military and political catastrophe to the Arab and Islamic nation. We are not ashamed to say this.”

The massacres of Oct. 7, Hamad added, are “just the first time, and there will be a second, a third, a fourth.”

For those of us who have been paying attention, these vows of Jewish annihilation are nothing new. It’s written in black and white in the Hamas charter.

So why are so many people now so stunned?

Because October 7 changed everything.

A terror attack that kills three Israelis is not the same as a terror invasion that massacres 1400 Israelis– including babies, infants, women, families and the elderly.

The sheer magnitude of these atrocities, in other words, has forced everyone to pay attention.

And here’s the thing about murdering, raping and mutilating 1400 human bodies—there is no room for nuance. The cruelty overflows with clarity.

No wonder so many people jumped on the activist group IfNotNow, who forever discredited themselves when they saw the massacres and immediately blamed Israel:

“Israel makes every day under apartheid a living hell for Palestinians. Human beings can’t live like this…. Blood is on the hands of Israel’s fascist government, army, and everyone who has aided their crimes against Palestinians.”

IfNotNow saw the worst Jewish calamity since the Holocaust and chose to stick to their usual pro-Palestinian talking points.

In that sense, the unprecedented magnitude of Oct. 7 has been a clarifying moment. It has shown us people’s true colors.

It has also brought clarity to how Jews have reacted to everything that has followed that darkest of days.

When we think of babies slaughtered and women raped and families burned alive, our revulsion at the assault on Jewish college students across U.S. campuses has zero nuance.

Our revulsion at the haters who are tearing down posters of Israeli hostages has zero nuance.

Our revulsion at those blaming Israel or the “occupation” for the massacres of Oct. 7 has zero nuance.

Our revulsion at college leaders, politicians, Hollywood personalities and anyone else who has been wishy-washy in their condemnation of the barbaric slaughter of 1400 Jews has zero nuance.

Our revulsion at those college leaders who have failed to protect Jewish students during this epidemic of anti-Jewish hostility has zero nuance.

Our revulsion at those asking Israel to go easy on Hamas has zero nuance.

Indeed, we can look at October 7 as a day that shattered nuance. It is one of those transcendent moments that might permanently reset the Jewish table, a day when so many Jews lost their innocence.

The trauma of losing 1400 Jewish souls and then seeing much of the world rise up against Jews will not easily go away. It is now hardwired in our collective memory.

We’re not fooled by the current focus on Israel’s efforts to eradicate Hamas. We know that those who are now bashing Israel and calling for a “ceasefire” were also bashing Israel immediately after Hamas murdered 1400 Jews.

We’re not fooled by the leftist intellectuals who use Israel as a battering ram for everything they hate about the West, from colonialism to capitalism to nationalism.

The trauma of losing 1400 Jewish souls and seeing much of the world rise up against Jews is not going away. It is now hardwired in our collective memory.
We’re not fooled by a biased media that now gleefully highlights Palestinian deaths in Gaza, because we know that the cowardly murderers of Hamas, who hide behind their own women and children, are ultimately responsible for every single Palestinian casualty.

And of course, we’re not fooled by those reflexive calls to make “peace” with those who are sworn to our destruction.

We don’t know where this war is going, but we know where the Jews are going.

After the bewildering and surreal darkness of Oct. 7, followed by the biggest burst of Jew hatred in recent memory, most of the Jews have picked a side.

Their own.


 
Police in Jerusalem arrested 11 Palestinians from the Gaza Strip on suspicion of illegally residing in the Jewish state, the Israel Police said on Thursday.

One of the detained Palestinians is the sister of a Hamas terrorist operative, the statement added.

The arrests were carried out during a raid of the Al-Makassed Hospital on the Mount of Olives, the largest of six Arab hospitals in Israel’s capital.

According to the police, the suspects had been staying in the hospital for weeks without being admitted as patients. The deputy director of the hospital has been summoned for questioning.

Some of the suspects entered Israel with a permit for the purpose of accompanying a person seeking medical treatment, but their permission expired several months ago.



 
More than 1,200 Jewish alumni of Harvard University have signed a letter to the university’s president and dean declaring that they will no longer walk delicately around the college administration when it comes to the issue of antisemitism on campus.

“We write to you in anticipation of ready collaboration and a reasonable discussion of our concerns. But this does not mean we will tread lightly in this existential moment,” the letter from the Harvard College Jewish Alumni Association (HCJAA) to university president Claudine Gay and dean Rakesh Kumar, dispatched on Thursday, stated.

“For centuries, the posture of Jewish people has been one of conciliation, nursed by the hope that if we show the non-Jewish majority that we are conciliatory, we may escape harm, persecution, and extermination,” the letter continued. “Those days are behind us.”

The first Jewish alumni association in the history of Harvard University, the HCJAA was formed over the last month in response to the Oct. 7 Hamas pogrom in southern Israel and the wave of antisemitism around the world that has accompanied it.

The timing of its letter to Gay and Kumar coincided with the release of a video showing a mob of Harvard students, some of them clad in Palestinian keffiyeh scarves, jostling and harassing a Jewish student as he walked across the campus. Among the mob was Ibrahim Bharmal, the editor of the prestigious Harvard Law Review — a publication whose past editors include former US President Barack Obama.

“Shame! Shame! Shame! Shame!” the mob screamed in a call-and-response chant directed at the Jewish student, who was forced to duck and weave through the crowd to free himself from the cluster of bodies encircling him.



Bharmal is also the co-president of the Harvard South Asian Law Students, a student group that signed a statement by the Harvard Palestine Solidarity Committee claiming that “Israel is the only one to blame” for the Hamas atrocities. The university has yet to issue a statement on the abuse of the Jewish student by Bharmal and his cohorts, or to clarify what, if any, disciplinary proceedings will be taken against Bharmal.

It is in this vexed climate that the HCJAA is seeking an urgent meeting with Gay to discuss “concrete plans to ensure the protection of Jewish students on campus.”

“Even before the current wave of antisemitism on campus, there had been a steady uptick in reported incidents of harassment, including physical assaults, verbal abuse, and graffiti of Hillel and other Jewish spaces,” the association pointed out. It also seeks an unambiguous condemnation of the Hamas pogrom from the university’s leadership, something so far conspicuous by its absence.

“There are deep concerns among the alumni about the destructive tone of conversation the university encourages by not swiftly and unequivocally condemning the terrorist attacks by Hamas,” Rebecca Claire Brooks, a co-founder of the HCJAA, told The Algemeiner in an interview on Thursday.

In the wake of Hamas’ atrocities, Harvard University has lost financial backingand faced sharp criticism for refusing to disavow students who signed the widely condemned letter that carried Bharmal’s signature. The controversies startled business and philanthropic leaders and prompted allegations that Harvard does not regard antisemitism as a significant issue.

According to Brooks, it is vital that the university establishes “whether or not there is a toxic culture at Harvard that allows a peddling of antisemitic discourse that calls all Jews colonizers, that calls for resistance by any means necessary, and that promotes very slanted views about the state of Israel.”

She stressed that HCJAA seeks “a fundamental shift in the campus culture in which students are able to have informed debates, to engage in critical thinking, to engage in moral reasoning without bullying and antagonism [from other] students.”

So far, Harvard has neither recognized nor agreed to hold a meeting with the HCJAA, which, Brooks said, is keen to discuss its “reasonable reforms.”

Other Jewish alumni cited in an HCJAA press release voiced similar concerns to Brooks.

“I’ve never seen anything like this,” said Peter Bronstein, who graduated from Harvard in 1965. “The University has accomplished twin moral failures: allowing the widespread glorification of Hamas terrorism by its students and abandoning its responsibility to teach students how to express their ideas without resorting to violent discourse.”

Adrian Ashkenazy, who graduated from Harvard in 1996, said he had become a co-founder of the HCJAA for “my father, who survived the Holocaust.” He added that “Harvard takes pride in being seen as a moral leader in the world, and I’m glad President Gay has recently spoken at Hillel about the problem of antisemitism. We hope to work with her and her new advisory council to translate these statements into actions.”

Sabrina Goldfischer, who graduated from Harvard this year, said the atmosphere on the campus was “terrifying.”

“I wrote my senior thesis, ‘The Death of Discourse: Antisemitism at Harvard College,’ about the systemic normalization of
misinformation about Jewish people and the state of Israel on campus,” she said. “This problem has been brewing at Harvard for a long time.”

In addition to a meeting with Harvard’s leadership, the HCJAA called on the university to adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance (IHRA) definition of antisemitism, already endorsed by hundreds of governmental and private organizations, stamp out hate speech, and form a commission to study the roots of antisemitism on the campus.



 
With anti-Israel and antisemitic protests spreading throughout the world, many are asking where could this hate come from.

A look into Arabic textbooks is a place to start finding answers to the spread of anti-Israel and Jewish protesters being filled with the fuel of jihad.

Arik Aggasi, COO and head of global partnerships for IMPACT-se (The Institute for Monitoring Peace and Cultural Tolerance in School Education,) presented compelling evidence undermining UNWRA's credibility to international journalists.

From over 1,000 textbooks published since 2016, the evidence shows a shocking promotion of hate among young children and a deterioration in content, falling far short of UNESCO standards. Some examples included the removal of content discussing peace agreements, negotiations, and the Two-State Solution, as well as the encouragement of violence and demonization of Israel across all grades and subjects, even infiltrating math and science.

IMPACT-se has been diligently monitoring and analyzing education worldwide since 1998. Their aim is to ensure that education complies with international standards of peace, tolerance, and non-violence, as derived from UNESCO declarations and resolutions. They note UAE, Bahrain, Egypt, and Saudia Arabia have removed some of the hate material.

IMPACT-se's findings have had a significant impact, such as the European Parliament's decision to freeze parts of Palestinian Authority funding until their curricula align with international standards. A joint report by IMPACT-se and United Nations Watch, presented to Congress, shed light on 47 new cases of incitement to hate and violence by UNRWA teachers and schools, in clear violation of the agency's policies. This report revealed a disturbing pattern of calling for the murder of Jews, glorifying terrorism, and inciting antisemitism within UNRWA's education system.

Norway's decision to cut funding over textbook incitement in December 2020 was met with a defiant response from Palestinian PM Shtayyeh, who declared that the "curriculum will not be surrendered." This resistance to reforming the curriculum, even in exchange for the release of frozen EU funds, was reiterated by PA Foreign Minister Al-Maliki in March 2022.

It is crucial to shed light on these issues and encourage international dialogue to address the root causes of conflict in the region. UNRWA's role in perpetuating hatred and violence through education must be scrutinized. Once Hamas is eliminated, efforts to promote peace and tolerance should be prioritized for the sake of a more peaceful and stable future for all parties involved.

It is time for the world leaders to wake up from woke and see what is written in Arabic, in the UNRWA textbooks.

Hopefully, it is not too late to stop the fires from spreading.

Here is a sampling of images provided by IMPACT-se, starting in lower school and included in teachers' manuals encouraging Jew-hatred and murder











(full article online)


 
2023-10-31T000000Z_1557981150_MT1HNSLCS000DACBXD_RTRMADP_3_HANS-LUCAS-1.jpg

Stars of David daubed on the wall of a street in the 14th arrondissement of Paris. Photo: Reuters/Magali Cohen
The French authorities announced on Thursday that a couple had been arrested for daubing Stars of David on Jewish-owned buildings in the 10th arrondissement of Paris.

The unnamed couple — a 33-year-old man and a 29-year-old woman from Moldova — were apprehended after witnesses spied them painting the symbol of Judaism on the walls of 15 buildings where Jews either reside or which house organizations serving the Jewish community.

The pair are being held in an administrative detention center while French officials decide whether to deport them.

The arrests were not connected to the 60 Stars of David painted on the walls of buildings in the 14th arrondissement during this week. An investigation into these incidents was opened on Tuesday by the Paris Public Prosecutor, but no arrests have yet been made.

A statement from the prosecutor said that it had not yet been determined whether the vandalism was “for the purpose of insulting the Jewish people, or claiming membership,” pointing out that the Stars had been daubed in blue rather than yellow — the color of the “Judenstern” (“Jews’ Star”) which the Nazis forced Jews to wear on their outer clothing.

The phenomenon of vandalizing buildings with the Star of David has surfaced in Germany and Argentina, as well as France. In the French case, the vandalism has taken place amid a surge in antisemitic acts since the Hamas pogrom of Oct. 7 in southern Israel.

Addressing the French parliament this week, Prime Minister Elisabeth Borne noted that “more than 850 incidents have taken place and nearly 6,000 online reports have been made.”

She added that more than 430 arrests had been made by police and that 230 investigations were currently “in progress.”

Commenting on the latest wave of antisemitism, the French anti-racist organization LICRA observed that while this was not the first time that French Jews had been under threat since World War II, the present situation “is of a new scale,” representing “gangrene in the social fabric, national cohesion, and values of the Republic.”


 
The IDF’s intelligence target bank efforts have led to striking over 11,000 targets in Gaza since the war started on October 7, a senior IDF intelligence official said on Thursday.

Further, the senior official said that on the first day of the invasion last week, the highly advanced artificial intelligence (AI) led target bank helped IDF fighters target and destroy 150 tunnel targets in one day.

Unlike in the past, 90% of the targets hit due to the mix of efforts by the AI and hundreds of IDF intelligence officials are being generated and struck in real-time.

While IDF intelligence has been using forms of AI for even longer, the program took a quantum leap forward in 2019.

Despite that leap forward, the senior intelligence official said that this is the first time that the AI target bank unit has been used for an all-out ground invasion, with numerous units maneuvering in hostile urban areas simultaneously.


(full article online)


 
Around five dozen individuals, some associated with Hamas and collectively boasting more than 100 million social media followers, have been waging a propaganda campaign against Israel on various social media platforms since the start of the Swords of Iron war on October 7.

These influencers, who identify as independent journalists, are often seen sporting blue press vests and helmets. They have also reportedly found refuge in Al-Shifa hospital, which the IDF recently disclosed serves as a Hamas command and control center, providing them with access to electricity and the internet.

While these individuals may appear to be speaking independently, they effectively act as the mouthpiece for the terrorist organization. Furthermore, they frequently feature in interviews and are quoted in mainstream media, causing their lies to spread.
-------------
A source in the know told the Post that a high percentage of these so-called journalists have been discovered to be working for Hamas and given amenities to do their jobs, such as a car and a driver, internet and shelter in Al-Shifa.

Their work is also being monitored by the terrorist organization to ensure they share Hamas’s version of events in Gaza. In addition, they serve as a megaphone for Hamas, such as calling on the people not to head down south as Israel requested to ensure their safety but instead claiming the request was trap and they would be killed on the way.

Hamas reportedly asked its followers to stay in northern Gaza so it can use them as human shields.


(full article online)


 
Itamar Ben Gvir: I see the tremendous support of Erdogan and his people for the Nazi murderers.
All I can do is suggest to Erdogan that he not only support from afar,
but let them reside in Turkey under his protection.



Ankara is ready to provide full support for the transfer of patients needing
continued treatment to Türkiye, the Turkish health minister said on Thursday.


 

Map of Israeli attacks closely tracks with tunnel locations in northern Gaza


In 2021, Hamas claimed that there were 500 kilometers of tunnels underneath Gaza. Earlier this week, an Iranian general claimed that Hamas has 400 km of tunnels in northern Gaza alone.

If those claims are true, that means that Hamas' tunnel system is double that of the New York City subway system, at 145 miles (233 km) of tunnels. And New York City of double the size of Gaza.

Israel released a map of the Gaza "metro" in 2021 showing where the main tunnels were.

The New York Times has been publishing its own maps of which sections in Gaza have been hit by airstrikes based on satellite imagery. And for the northern section of Gaza, the two maps are strikingly similar:


What these two maps indicate is that when we see the scenes of devastation of buildings being destroyed, and when human rights groups say smugly that "we found no evidence of militant activity in the area" and accusing Israel of war crimes, the targets are usually underground - underneath those very buildings.

The map also shows that while Israel has hit multiple targets in the south, it has concentrated the bulk of its firepower in the north, exactly where Israel has warned Gaza civilians to evacuate from over the past three weeks. While the pundits have been claiming that such an evacuation was impossible, in fact over those three weeks a significant proportion of Gazans have relocated.

These maps show that Israel is not violating the rules of war. It is not shooting indiscriminately. It is doing everything it can to avoid civilian casualties.

And they prove that Hamas is the only party that is guilty of war crimes by deliberately locating its tunnels under civilian infrastructure.






 

My viral cartoon, Amy Schumer, 10/7 rape denial and other antisemitic lies


I created and posted this cartoon October 25:



It struck a chord, and immediately went viral, being copied on other platforms, because it showed the immorality of the protesters who approved of or cheered the Hamas attacks on October 7 and what they really think.

One person who re-posted this was comedian Amy Schumer on her Instagram with a short commentary:



There was an uproar and Schumer deleted it.

But let's look at the criticisms of my cartoon, since I chose my words carefully.

The Daily Dot wrote:


According to a report from FactCheck.org, claims of Hamas militants sexually assaulting Israeli women are largely uncorroborated. The Los Angeles Times quietly removed a reference to rape in an opinion piece from Oct. 9, as there was no evidence for the claim.

However, these accusations have become one of the leading allegations levied against Hamas, and by extension, Palestinian civilians.

Schumer has since apologized for posting the comic, in an Instagram post featuring empty baby strollers with red heart-shaped balloons tied to the handles.

“Hamas terrorists are who I’m talking about. No Gazans. Sorry I posted something that was hurtful to them. I’ll be more careful,” she wrote in the post’s caption. “I love my brothers and sisters in Gaza. I love Muslims. I love everyone.”

Factcheck.org says there were no rapes? When I click on the link, while it at first sad there is no solid evidence, it added two additional facts

If you check Factcheck.org, they added two updates to their original post - before this Daily Dot article was written! - saying that there was indeed evidence of rape. And since then more evidence has come to light.

So that accusation against my cartoon was a lie. And the writer knowingly misrepresented what Factcheck wrote.

Wajahat Ali wrote in The Daily Beast:


In a since-deleted Instagram post from Oct. 24, Schumer shared a single-panel comic that portrayed American pro-Palestinian supporters holding posters and signs that read “Gazans rape Jewish girls only in self-defense,” and “Proud of our rapist martyrs.” In addition to her outrageous and inflammatory claims, Schumer felt perfectly fine posting a cartoon that blamed all Gazans instead of Hamas, the militant organization that controls Gaza and was responsible for committing war crimes and killing 1,400 Israelis on Oct. 7.
No, the cartoon didn't blame all Gazans. It blamed Gazans. There were many non-Hamas members - perhaps a thousand - who came out to murder, loot and rape Jewish civilians. Hamas itself claims, ignoring massive video evidence, that it did not do any atrocities - but other Gazans may have. Dr. Basem Naim said, "There are other Palestinian groups who became part of the operation, even ordinary people when they see the prison around Gaza Strip was broken, and the siege was open."

So that accusation against my cartoon is a lie and my words "Gazans rape Jewish girls only in self defense" is a pretty accurate if crude representation of the opinions of the many who defended the pogroms as Gazans defending themselves.


Antisemite Marc Lamont Hill took a different tack, saying, "Amy Schumer had to take down an Instagram post she made where she was trying to chastise people for having any kind of nuanced position on the issue by making it seem as if they were pro-Hamas, pro-rape, pro-violence, and she was really reinforcing these really nasty, orientalist, racist ideas of Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular as rapists and violent."

The cartoon, as mentioned, was specifically about the protesters. And the protesters who chant "Globalize the intifada" and :"From the river to the sea" and "Khaybar, Khaybar ya yahud" and that terrorism is a legal right are indeed glorifying and promoting violence. They are openly pro-Hamas; they celebrated the attack before Israel retaliated. Sorry, there is no nuance behind saying Palestinians may "resist - By Any Means Necessary." It means what it says - rape included.

So that accusation against my cartoon is a lie.

The cartoon itself did not say that Arabs in general or Palestinians in particular are rapists and violent.

So that accusation against my cartoon is a lie.

It's funny how so many people had so many problems with my cartoon and yet not one of them is true.

If you want to see more of my cartoons, poster and memes, I've been putting them on Instagram for a couple of years now, and there are over 600 of them!


 
Are people fully aware what they are endorsing when they express their support for Hamas?

The level of solidarity with Hamas in the world is astonishing, consiodering they carried out the worst masscare of Jews since the Holocaust.

But do these individuals truly comprehend their stance?

A young man embarked on a mission, asking New Yorkers to sign a petition in support of Hamas, shedding light on the critical details of what they are endorsing. A must-watch.




 

Forum List

Back
Top