It can't be made / any more clear...

easyt65

Diamond Member
Aug 4, 2015
90,307
61,142
2,645
Lisa Page's released transcripts of her testimony before Congress under oath reveals there was no evidence of collusion at the time the Special Counsel investigation was launched in May 2017. Nearly two years later, there is still no evidence.

The newly released transcripts of my interview with Lisa Page indicate that Peter Strzok had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the launch of the FBI and special counsel investigations into the matter. pic.twitter.com/Mt8SChdocI
— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) March 13, 2019





The Department of Justice Inspector General found the anti-Trump messages exchanged between Page and Strzok to be 'deeply troubling'. From a report released in August 2018:

FROM THE IG'S REPORT:
"During the course of the review, the OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between some FBI employees on the investigative team, conducted using FBI mobile devices and computers, that expressed statements of hostility toward then candidate Donald Trump and statements of support for then candidate Clinton," the report states. "We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations."

"Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, 'No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it' in response to her question '[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!', it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice," the report continues."



THERE NEVER WAS ANY EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION / A CRIME INVOLVING PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT WARRANTED AN INVESTIGATION OR THE APPOINTMENT OF A (CO-CONSPIRATOR) SPECIAL COUNSEL. 2 YEARS LATER, THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME ... COMMITTED BY THE PRESIDENT!



Here's What Lisa Page Had to Say About That FBI "Insurance Policy"


.
 
Lisa Page's released transcripts of her testimony before Congress under oath reveals there was no evidence of collusion at the time the Special Counsel investigation was launched in May 2017. Nearly two years later, there is still no evidence.

The newly released transcripts of my interview with Lisa Page indicate that Peter Strzok had no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia prior to the launch of the FBI and special counsel investigations into the matter. pic.twitter.com/Mt8SChdocI
— John Ratcliffe (@RepRatcliffe) March 13, 2019





The Department of Justice Inspector General found the anti-Trump messages exchanged between Page and Strzok to be 'deeply troubling'. From a report released in August 2018:

FROM THE IG'S REPORT:
"During the course of the review, the OIG discovered text messages and instant messages between some FBI employees on the investigative team, conducted using FBI mobile devices and computers, that expressed statements of hostility toward then candidate Donald Trump and statements of support for then candidate Clinton," the report states. "We were deeply troubled by text messages exchanged between Strzok and Page that potentially indicated or created the appearance that investigative decisions were impacted by bias or improper considerations."

"Most of the text messages raising such questions pertained to the Russia investigation, which was not a part of this review. Nonetheless, when one senior FBI official, Strzok, who was helping to lead the Russia investigation at the time, conveys in a text message to another senior FBI official, Page, 'No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it' in response to her question '[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!', it is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. This is antithetical to the core values of the FBI and the Department of Justice," the report continues."



THERE NEVER WAS ANY EVIDENCE OF COLLUSION / A CRIME INVOLVING PRESIDENT TRUMP THAT WARRANTED AN INVESTIGATION OR THE APPOINTMENT OF A (CO-CONSPIRATOR) SPECIAL COUNSEL. 2 YEARS LATER, THERE IS STILL NO EVIDENCE OF A CRIME ... COMMITTED BY THE PRESIDENT!



Here's What Lisa Page Had to Say About That FBI "Insurance Policy"


.


If no indictments are issued to the corrupt govt employees involved in this, then this country is lost. We will have become Venezuela north.
 

Forum List

Back
Top