Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
It's worse than that. After promising arms and not giving them, obama promised air support which he also did not give. Instead he ordered the bombing of vacant buildings and empty lots.How is that Obama's fault, podjo?
If you want to tout the Kurds as part of your "boots on the ground" force, Jake...don't you think it would behoove you to give them weapons so they can fight a winning ground campaign?
Would you join a "coalition" with someone who's heart is so obviously not in what they are doing? If it weren't for the Kurds, ISIS would already control the northern oil fields of Iraq yet Barry won't give them arms.
Remember all that top al quaeda leadership killed by drones? They are showing up hale and hearty. Just more obama lies.
Has Obama failed to arm the Kurds? Show me, guys, not just flap your lips.
Show me how Obama has failed the Kurds.
How is that Obama's fault, podjo?
Yurt is yurtling again.
It's what he does.
Not in this case, no. Nor is it Obama's.
Frank, bickering aside, do you think the US should put heavy combat units back in Iraq?
Do genuine "mainstream" Republicans like you always stick up for Obama?
We stick up for the truth, while you propaganda mis-artists simply whine.
I understand perfectly. Obama tried to pressure the US government (and Congress) to cut American foreign aid to Armenia (a semi-democracy) and at the same time increase foreign aid to Azerbaijan (a brutal dictatorship). Before that he tried to pressure the Armenian government to sign 'protocols' with Turkey and accept a ludicrous 'historical commission' to enable Turkish genocide denial, and he refused to recognize the genocide he said he would.That is not what Armenian Americans voted for. Obama is a real nasty piece of work* (that had his morality chip turned off when he took office), not that most Americans (and Armenian Americans in particular) don't know that already: OBAMA SEEKS 38 CUT IN AID TO ARMENIAYurt is confused and hipeter does not understand.
We can't win a peace in Iraq, no matter how many troops we station there.
On the other issue of the current war between ISIS and Iraq/Syria, it is still possible to defeat ISIS with a small force on the ground, though certainly this time Turkey doesn't want to put its head out for Kurds, and Iran has enough on its plate in Syria help out much in Iraq. Airstrikes won't win the war against ISIS, but at the very least they will make an ISIS advance more difficult.[From 2009] WASHINGTON, DC – Despite a 9% increase in overall foreign aid spending, President Barack Obama today called for a 38% cut in aid to Armenia, a 20% increase in aid to Azerbaijan, and the abandonment of the longstanding Armenia-Azerbaijan military aid parity agreement in favor of Baku, reported the Armenian National Committee of America (ANCA).
After touting the Kurdish fighters as allies in the fight against isis, the obama regime quickly betrayed them too and left them bare asses hanging out fighting against mortars with light weapons.
Lightly Armed Kurds Face Terrorist Tanks Feel Deserted and Furious at U.S. - Bloomberg
Islamic State is “still shelling Kobani with mortars as people there are struggling to defend themselves,” Ibrahim Ayhan, a pro-Kurdish lawmaker in the Turkish parliament, said by phone from the country’s border town of Suruc today. Airstrikes last night by U.S.-led coalition warplanes didn’t “change the tide of the war,” he said.
Of course the airstrikes didn't change the tide of war. Bombing empty buildings and vacant lots never changed the tide of any war.
broken marriages, suicides and PTSD sufferers due to endless deployments and shortened dwell times (during Cheney/Bush II's Admin) are "cheaper"? In whose world is that a reality?A lot of repub-voting, world police-types coming out of the woodwork
NEWSFLASH!!! We're broke and have been since vietraq
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk
Well, gee whiz...Dottie! If it's cost savings you were looking for I think you'd find that leaving 20,000 US troops behind to stabilize Iraq would be far cheaper than mounting an air assault with lots of million dollar smart weapons.
broken marriages, suicides and PTSD sufferers due to endless deployments and shortened dwell times (during Cheney/Bush II's Admin) are "cheaper"? In whose world is that a reality?A lot of repub-voting, world police-types coming out of the woodwork
NEWSFLASH!!! We're broke and have been since vietraq
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk
Well, gee whiz...Dottie! If it's cost savings you were looking for I think you'd find that leaving 20,000 US troops behind to stabilize Iraq would be far cheaper than mounting an air assault with lots of million dollar smart weapons.
After touting the Kurdish fighters as allies in the fight against isis, the obama regime quickly betrayed them too and left them bare asses hanging out fighting against mortars with light weapons.
Lightly Armed Kurds Face Terrorist Tanks Feel Deserted and Furious at U.S. - Bloomberg
Islamic State is “still shelling Kobani with mortars as people there are struggling to defend themselves,” Ibrahim Ayhan, a pro-Kurdish lawmaker in the Turkish parliament, said by phone from the country’s border town of Suruc today. Airstrikes last night by U.S.-led coalition warplanes didn’t “change the tide of the war,” he said.
Of course the airstrikes didn't change the tide of war. Bombing empty buildings and vacant lots never changed the tide of any war.
All the usual detractors are completely full of shit. Had Obama sent troops into Syria a year ago these same fucking hypocrites would be screaming about that instead.
link asswipe. Oldstylebroken marriages, suicides and PTSD sufferers due to endless deployments and shortened dwell times (during Cheney/Bush II's Admin) are "cheaper"? In whose world is that a reality?A lot of repub-voting, world police-types coming out of the woodwork
NEWSFLASH!!! We're broke and have been since vietraq
Sent from my BN NookHD+ using Tapatalk
Well, gee whiz...Dottie! If it's cost savings you were looking for I think you'd find that leaving 20,000 US troops behind to stabilize Iraq would be far cheaper than mounting an air assault with lots of million dollar smart weapons.
Do you really not see what's coming, Dottie? We ARE going to have to commit ground troops to Iraq or watch as ISIS takes over an entire country. Every single military mind out there is telling Barry that he can't defeat ISIS with just airstrikes and he's getting squat for boots on the ground support from Arab nations.
Obama could have done the intelligent thing and left a stabilizing force in Iraq but he did what he's done all along with foreign policy...made decisions based on how he'd LIKE the world to be like rather than how the world really IS!
