It Has Started: Activist Court Rewrites Law

Don't care. Freedom is freedom.

Protect yourself if you are afraid.

Public safety is the easiest and most widely used excuse for totalitarianism.

I wonder if the world has ever before seen such a blatant and extreme case as the #CoronaHoax2020 of a fake crisis being cooked up, just so that totalitarians can use it to create a “public safety” pretext for their abuses of power?
 
Show me where it says you have the right to ignore temporary public health orders?

First Amendment to our Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Fourteenth Amendment, which incorporates the First Amendment (previously held to apply only to the federal government) to all levels of government:
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section. 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section. 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section. 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section. 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.

And on top of all that, nearly all of these “temporary public health orders” are not actual, valid laws anyway. There is not any jurisdiction anywhere in the United states, where any one individual is given the authority to make law by unilateral dictate. Valid laws must be created through the proper legislative process, or in many states, by putting it on the ballot to a direct vote of the people.

These “temporary public health orders” have not been enacted by any valid method, so they are not laws, we are under no legal obligation to obey them, and no part of government has any legitimate authority to attempt to enforce them.


And stop lying about the death rate. You're murdering people with your lies.

:cuckoo:
 
Last edited:
In November thousands gathered in secret to celebrate the wedding of the grandson of a revered Rabbi. No spike in deaths.

24nyvirus-weddings-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600.jpg
There was such a spike in this community that the mayor threatened to lock them down. Yes, that kind of behavior led to many more cases.

No, not true
 
Show me where it says you have the right to ignore temporary public health orders?

First Amendment to our Constitution:
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.


Fourteenth Amendment, which incorporates the First Amendment (previously held to apply only to the federal government) to all levels of government:
Section. 1. All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Section. 2. Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, excluding Indians not taxed. But when the right to vote at any election for the choice of electors for President and Vice President of the United States, Representatives in Congress, the Executive and Judicial officers of a State, or the members of the Legislature thereof, is denied to any of the male inhabitants of such State, being twenty-one years of age, and citizens of the United States, or in any way abridged, except for participation in rebellion, or other crime, the basis of representation therein shall be reduced in the proportion which the number of such male citizens shall bear to the whole number of male citizens twenty-one years of age in such State.
Section. 3. No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Section. 4. The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.
Section. 5. The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.


And stop lying about the death rate. You're murdering people with your lies.

:cuckoo:

These fools don't, can't, or refuse to understand the Constitution
 
I do not give a single fuck.
Obviously. Just don't hide behind
But the court’s new conservative majority
The court has been conservative for at least the last 20 years. You think that is a NEW majority? SMH.
Conservative, yes.

Rabidly conservitard? Not until tRump.
I am sorry that the Court refuses to allow your further tyranny and complete shitting on individual rights. Those evil bastards.
Don't be stupider than you have to be.

What they did was murder a bunch of nice old folks to keep you and your retarded friends happy.







Ummmm, that's governor cuomo, dumbass. Not these religious people.

Get your facts straight.
Bars were and are closed in new York.
And in Maine. The only thing still closed.

No they're not, a simple Google search told me that
I'm not going to argue with you about it. I live here.
In November thousands gathered in secret to celebrate the wedding of the grandson of a revered Rabbi. No spike in deaths.

24nyvirus-weddings-videoSixteenByNineJumbo1600.jpg
There was such a spike in this community that the mayor threatened to lock them down. Yes, that kind of behavior led to many more cases.

No, not true
 
Show me where it says that our rights can be waived during a pandemic. If you can't come up with that then shut the fuck up.
10th Amendment
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.

Highlighting added by me to your quote.

The First Amendment, as incorporated to the states and local governments under the Fourteenth Amendment, prohibits them from violating the people's freedoms of speech, religion, and assembly.
 
Late on Friday night, the Supreme Court blocked California’s public health ban on indoor religious services in a splintered 6–3 decision that augurs a major shift in the law of religious liberty. Justice Elena Kagan’s extraordinary dissent accused her conservative colleagues of endangering lives by overruling public health officials and potentially facilitating the spread of COVID-19. But the court’s new conservative majority ignored her warning—and, in the process, gave itself new powers to strike down alleged burdens on religious freedom. The Supreme Court effectively tossed out decades of case law in a late-night emergency order, unsettling precedent that states have relied upon to craft COVID restrictions. As Kagan sharply noted, Friday’s order “injects uncertainty into an area where uncertainty has human costs.”



Keep it up religious nut jobs. You're going to be our best reason to expand the court. And you can bet the farm on it. The court will be expanded to stop religious extremism. The most fundamental reason America was created to begin with.


There is no case law that says that Blue State Governors can void the Bill of Rights based on Fake Science.
 
lasting for only a limited period of time; not permanent.
So, 100 years is considered "temporary" under that definition. As long as it is not "permanent" right?

And where, in the Constitution, is it suggested that government has the authority to enact “laws” outside of the defined valid processes for doing so, or to violate the rights of the people that the Bill of Rights explicitly affirms, so long as these are only in effect “temporarily”?
 
With any luck at all, 99.9% of ministers in these critical areas will keep their doors closed and worship on line in order to keep their parishioners safe until the case #'s come down and public health officials give the all clear.
They can CHOOSE to limit in person worship.

They cannot be COMPELLED by the government under threat of legal reprisal.

Sorry, but this is America.

I'm sure the Chinese model is much more to your liking...comply or be welded into your homes.



What the fuck is wrong with you people.
 
Late on Friday night, the Supreme Court blocked California’s public health ban on indoor religious services in a splintered 6–3 decision that augurs a major shift in the law of religious liberty. Justice Elena Kagan’s extraordinary dissent accused her conservative colleagues of endangering lives by overruling public health officials and potentially facilitating the spread of COVID-19
Sounds like a circumcision / vaccination district where New Testament preaching is absolutely forbidden.
 
Bars are still closed in Maine. Everything else is open, including churches.

You're lying, Google it. Bar curfews were lifted a week ago, used to be 9 PM closing.

Stop the tired game
Bars in Maine have only been permitted to serve outside. It is fucking February, if you hadn't noticed. The bars were supposed to reopen with restrictions on November 1, but due to a surge at that time, it was postponed, and they still don't have permission to open because our numbers continued climbing until a couple weeks ago.
 
You folks are the reason the US has some of the worst Covid rates in the world. I hope you're proud.

Don't blame those of us who demand our rightful freedoms.

Blame the corrupt politicians who have cooked up this fake “pandemic” as an excuse to seize and abuse powers.

It is those of you who stupidly obey them and allow them to get away with this shit who are to blame for allowing it to continue. This “pandemic” will last exactly as long as corrupts politicians are able to get away with exploiting it, no more or less.
 
Last edited:
Late on Friday night, the Supreme Court blocked California’s public health ban on indoor religious services in a splintered 6–3 decision that augurs a major shift in the law of religious liberty. Justice Elena Kagan’s extraordinary dissent accused her conservative colleagues of endangering lives by overruling public health officials and potentially facilitating the spread of COVID-19. But the court’s new conservative majority ignored her warning—and, in the process, gave itself new powers to strike down alleged burdens on religious freedom. The Supreme Court effectively tossed out decades of case law in a late-night emergency order, unsettling precedent that states have relied upon to craft COVID restrictions. As Kagan sharply noted, Friday’s order “injects uncertainty into an area where uncertainty has human costs.”



Keep it up religious nut jobs. You're going to be our best reason to expand the court. And you can bet the farm on it. The court will be expanded to stop religious extremism. The most fundamental reason America was created to begin with.

The title of your topic is a lie. The court didn't rewrite anything. The Supreme Court merely decides if laws are constitutional or not.
 

Forum List

Back
Top