It's a year later and Mitt Romney continues to humiliate Barack Obama

[velvtacheeze]

This is one of Rott's most embarrassingly stupid posts. Obama's deal with Syria & Russia is very popular. Americans don't care that it wasn't Obama's first option, which was sadly to bomb Syrian.

Mitt wouldn't have taken the deal, and we'd be at war with Syria by now, and getting ready for war with Iran.

Conservatives have to realize that most voters don't want an aggressive foreign policy anymore.

 

[BuckwheatsMomma]

LOL!

Never thought the first discussion/post I would read on this forum would be so funny!

 

[Pasco08]

This is one of Rott's most embarrassingly stupid posts. Obama's deal with Syria & Russia is very popular. Americans don't care that it wasn't Obama's first option, which was sadly to bomb Syrian.

Mitt wouldn't have taken the deal, and we'd be at war with Syria by now, and getting ready for war with Iran.

Conservatives have to realize that most voters don't want an aggressive foreign policy anymore.

Don't tell them the truth it might actually get through.

 

[candycorn]

The overwhelming amount of low information voters in this country is humiliating indeed.....

Yes the map should have been solid blue.

At least make sense the next time you feebly attempt to make a funny....

Mitt Romney proved one thing; that Paul Ryan could take a joke (and vice versa).

 

[candycorn]

This is one of Rott's most embarrassingly stupid posts. Obama's deal with Syria & Russia is very popular. Americans don't care that it wasn't Obama's first option, which was sadly to bomb Syrian.

Mitt wouldn't have taken the deal, and we'd be at war with Syria by now, and getting ready for war with Iran.

Conservatives have to realize that most voters don't want an aggressive foreign policy anymore.

Just one of the infinite reasons that Obama was, is, and always will be the superior choice to Romney.

 

[Seawytch]

What are you talking about?!? Obama has spent more in 3 years than all presidents in U.S. history combined spent in their first 4 years...

You're happy just because that reckless, nation collapsing spending is not on defense?!?

You can't even give a rational answer to a simple question. You just worship him for the sake of worshipping him...

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Oh sweetie - you're little liberal bar graph simply cannot trump reality. What was the national debt the day that Obama took office?

Not as much as it was after he put two wars on the books. Previously the money was being spent, but hidden. Fact is he's (Obama)the smallest government spender since Eisenhower.

 

[candycorn]

I said LEADing examples

So a democratic administration is spending less on defense and more on abortions?
No news there.

He can't even lead his way around Syria without Putin's help

Easy;

He's not reactionary; sending troops into every Middle East hot spot to stamp out terrorists and making more terrorist as a result. In short; he brings an intelligence to the Oval office that wasn't there between 2000 and 2008.

No

He just sends drones with bombs, killing more teenagers than terrorists.
That doesn't create more terrorists at all

In the cold calculus of warfare; there is always collateral damage. Better them than us but I think 6,000 dead Americans would have quenched your thirst for blood. I guess I'd be wrong though.

How many Americans have to be killed in the ME for no reason to satisfy you?

 

[driveby]

Yes the map should have been solid blue.

At least make sense the next time you feebly attempt to make a funny....

Mitt Romney proved one thing; that Paul Ryan could take a joke (and vice versa).

You missed step one, again.......

 

[Seawytch]

Easy;

He's not reactionary; sending troops into every Middle East hot spot to stamp out terrorists and making more terrorist as a result. In short; he brings an intelligence to the Oval office that wasn't there between 2000 and 2008.

No

He just sends drones with bombs, killing more teenagers than terrorists.
That doesn't create more terrorists at all

In the cold calculus of warfare; there is always collateral damage. Better them than us but I think 6,000 dead Americans would have quenched your thirst for blood. I guess I'd be wrong though.

How many Americans have to be killed in the ME for no reason to satisfy you?

Shock and awe!

 

[driveby]

Dead civilians while Bush is president=Americans are terrorists.

Dead civilians while Obama is President=collateral damage.

You can't make this shit up.......

 

[francoHFW]

Dem policy in ME- making the best of a bad thing.

Raygun, Bush I, and Booosh in ME, AND 9/11- absolute catastrophe...

 

[hortysir]

It really takes an incredible level of cognitive dissonance to come up with a thread like this.

Vocabulary not welcomed hear, lair

 

[Missouri_Mike]

We're not getting our soldiers killed in the middle east due to new conflicts for starters

We're not increasing defense spending to insane levels; Obama has kept them at merely unbelieveably goofy levels

We're not threatened by the overturn of Roe V. Wade so reproductive choice is still a matter between a woman and her doctor

I could go on and on.

What are you talking about?!? Obama has spent more in 3 years than all presidents in U.S. history combined spent in their first 4 years...

You're happy just because that reckless, nation collapsing spending is not on defense?!?

You can't even give a rational answer to a simple question. You just worship him for the sake of worshipping him...

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Math isn't really your thing is it? Romney knew how to do math, you and little obie not so much.

 

[Seawytch]

What are you talking about?!? Obama has spent more in 3 years than all presidents in U.S. history combined spent in their first 4 years...

You're happy just because that reckless, nation collapsing spending is not on defense?!?

You can't even give a rational answer to a simple question. You just worship him for the sake of worshipping him...

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Math isn't really your thing is it? Romney knew how to do math, you and little obie not so much.

http://thehill.com/blogs/on-the-mon...-new-tax-proposals-add-34-trillion-to-deficit

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Math isn't really your thing is it? Romney knew how to do math, you and little obie not so much.

Romney's new tax proposals add $3.4 trillion to deficit - The Hill's On The Money

So yes. your knowledge of math and economics is severely lacking. Once again you and little obie aren't all that impressive.

 

[P@triot]

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Oh sweetie - you're little liberal bar graph simply cannot trump reality. What was the national debt the day that Obama took office?

Not as much as it was after he put two wars on the books. Previously the money was being spent, but hidden. Fact is he's (Obama)the smallest government spender since Eisenhower.

Someone has their tinfoil hat on tonight!

Tell me something [MENTION=24452]Seawytch[/MENTION] - can you provide a single link from an even slightly credible source (I'll even accept radical left-wing CNN) that backs up your outrageous story here which you literally just made up because the facts have painted you into a corner? Just ONE?

Ladies & Gentlemen - I give Seawytch! While I'm posting links to source after credible source, she provides tinfoil hat theories!

 

[P@triot]

It really takes an incredible level of cognitive dissonance to come up with a thread like this.

Or just a video which - one year later - events PROVE that one man (Romney) was dead-on and one man (Obama) was astoundingly incompetent.

Any wonder folks why Obama and the Nazi Dumbocrats want a "kill switch" for the internet? This right here is why! Truth and information is the greatest threat to the Dumbocrat agenda...

 

[candycorn]

Dead civilians while Bush is president=Americans are terrorists.

Dead civilians while Obama is President=collateral damage.

You can't make this shit up.......

Anyone who made that claim is full of shit.

But your comparison to sending in divisions of ground troops under Bush to drone strikes by Obama is silly both in practice and scale. It's shameful that you have to try to equate the two to make your flimsy point.

 

[candycorn]

What are you talking about?!? Obama has spent more in 3 years than all presidents in U.S. history combined spent in their first 4 years...

You're happy just because that reckless, nation collapsing spending is not on defense?!?

You can't even give a rational answer to a simple question. You just worship him for the sake of worshipping him...

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

Math isn't really your thing is it? Romney knew how to do math, you and little obie not so much.

332-206.
Adds up.

Scoreboard.

 

[NYcarbineer]

What are you talking about?!? Obama has spent more in 3 years than all presidents in U.S. history combined spent in their first 4 years...

You're happy just because that reckless, nation collapsing spending is not on defense?!?

You can't even give a rational answer to a simple question. You just worship him for the sake of worshipping him...

Rotty believing the lies again. Proof be damned!!

And once again the FACTS prove Seawytch is a brainwashed slave to her liberal masters...

Obama Has Now Borrowed More Than All Presidents from Washington to W

The debt was 10 trillion when Bush left office. It's not 20 trillion now.