It's Looking More And More As If -whistleblower

[airplanemechanic]

Democrats always preach about "transparency" yet conduct all investigations in secret, behind closed doors.

Anyone who still doesn't call demwits hypocrites is a partisan dumbass.

Trump has been transparent. Full release of the Mueller report AND transcript of his conversation. NEITHER did he have to release.

I haven't seen a more transparent president than this one in a LOOONNG time.

 

[The Original Tree]

Two scenarios!

1. There never was a Whistleblower.
2. The Whistleblower is a liar.

WTH? Adam Schiff Now Says Democrats Will Not Need Trump-Hating CIA Leaker's Testimony for Their Impeachment Investigation

Whistleblower was proven to be correct

Given that his testimony is based on what he heard, his testimony is not very valuable.
However, the testimony and documentation of those that were there is highly valuable

The Whistleblower shined a spotlight on the stink of Trump. Up to the investigators after that

If the spy was spotted the c and the t he could not spell orrec.

It's a felony to share the contents of a Presidential Conversation with another head of state with an unauthorized person even in a casual conversation, so I am guessing you want the "Spy" who is engaged in Espionage prosecuted for Espionage, correct?

There is that word again.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Yes, Ukrainegate just blew up in the face of the Democrats.

GOALPOST SHIFT: Schiff Now Says There Doesn’t Need To Be A Quid Pro Quo

Impeachment inquiry: Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony "might not be necessary" on "Face the Nation" today - CBS News

 

[Claudette]

Two scenarios!

1. There never was a Whistleblower.
2. The Whistleblower is a liar.

WTH? Adam Schiff Now Says Democrats Will Not Need Trump-Hating CIA Leaker's Testimony for Their Impeachment Investigation

Whistleblower was proven to be correct

Given that his testimony is based on what he heard, his testimony is not very valuable.
However, the testimony and documentation of those that were there is highly valuable

The Whistleblower shined a spotlight on the stink of Trump. Up to the investigators after that

Liar! You haven't seen the whistleblower's testimony nor has he been cross-examined. Again, you're liar!

Gee. I thought this whistleblower was going to blow the pants of Trump and reveal the crimes he's committed??

Guess he wasn't as important as Shitforbrains led us all to believe. Now he doesn't need to testify at all??

Color me shocked.

What does the whistleblower know that was not secondhand info?

Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources

Sure they were. You red the transcript and there was nothing in it.

Just another nothing burger to excite you lefty loons.

 

[WEATHER53]

Fake The Nation

 

[jc456]

Anonymous witnesses secret trials.

This is definitely a coup.

They ARE Stalinists, in every sense of the term.

without question

 

[jc456]

Democrats always preach about "transparency" yet conduct all investigations in secret, behind closed doors.

Anyone who still doesn't call demwits hypocrites is a partisan dumbass.

Trump has been transparent. Full release of the Mueller report AND transcript of his conversation. NEITHER did he have to release.

I haven't seen a more transparent president than this one in a LOOONNG time.

just like obammycare, they had to pass it before they knew what was in it. too funny, they are so unfair in life, it isn't even funny anymore. disingenuous pricks.

 

[Dragonlady]

- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

There's now multiple whistleblowers, including Ambassador Yovanovich, and now Gordon Sonderland is set to testify that Trump told him there was no quid quo pro, but he doesn't know whether this was true. He was just repeating what the President told him, in that text, which Trump is claiming proves "No quid pro quo".

Just because Trump says a thing, doesn't mean it's true. Everyone who works for him should know that, and probably does.

 

[jc456]

Yes, Ukrainegate just blew up in the face of the Democrats.

GOALPOST SHIFT: Schiff Now Says There Doesn’t Need To Be A Quid Pro Quo

Impeachment inquiry: Adam Schiff says whistleblower testimony "might not be necessary" on "Face the Nation" today - CBS News

so trump isn't allowed to be president cause shitt's says so?

 

[WEATHER53]

I heard that she said that he said..........

 

[rightwinger]

Two scenarios!

1. There never was a Whistleblower.
2. The Whistleblower is a liar.

WTH? Adam Schiff Now Says Democrats Will Not Need Trump-Hating CIA Leaker's Testimony for Their Impeachment Investigation

Whistleblower was proven to be correct

Given that his testimony is based on what he heard, his testimony is not very valuable.
However, the testimony and documentation of those that were there is highly valuable

The Whistleblower shined a spotlight on the stink of Trump. Up to the investigators after that

Liar! You haven't seen the whistleblower's testimony nor has he been cross-examined. Again, you're liar!

Gee. I thought this whistleblower was going to blow the pants of Trump and reveal the crimes he's committed??

Guess he wasn't as important as Shitforbrains led us all to believe. Now he doesn't need to testify at all??

Color me shocked.

What does the whistleblower know that was not secondhand info?

Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources

/----/ "Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources"
Other sources who were not on the actual phone call - you mean.
hear·say
/ˈhirˌsā/
noun

• 1.information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor: "according to rightwinger, Trump said dig up some dirt"

Other sources like Trumps own transcript and the Ukraine ambassador

 

[iamwhatiseem]

- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

Wow...once again... a person is guilty before the investigation even begins, let alone a trial.
So according to you, we don't need courts...hell not even lawyers etc... not even the police!...all we need is someone to say something...and poof...you are guilty.

 

[Cellblock2429]

- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

Wow...once again... a person is guilty before the investigation even begins, let alone a trial.
So according to you, we don't need courts...hell not even lawyers etc... not even the police!...all we need is someone to say something...and poof...you are guilty.

/——-/ Republican thy name is guilty.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

Wow...once again... a person is guilty before the investigation even begins, let alone a trial.
So according to you, we don't need courts...hell not even lawyers etc... not even the police!...all we need is someone to say something...and poof...you are guilty.

/——-/ Republican thy name is guilty.

Orange man bad.
Orange man always bad

 

[White_MAGA_Man]

- there is no actual whistleblower.

I see that logic was never your forte.

There is no need for the whistleblower to give testimony because everything he/she highlighted has already been proven from other sources.

You know this.

Wow...once again... a person is guilty before the investigation even begins, let alone a trial.
So according to you, we don't need courts...hell not even lawyers etc... not even the police!...all we need is someone to say something...and poof...you are guilty.

/——-/ Republican thy name is guilty.

That right there nullifies the whole Impeachment Inquiry!

 

[konradv]

Two scenarios!
WTH?
1. There never was a Whistleblower.
2. The Whistleblower was a liar

3. You don't know what you're talking about, troll.

Really Comrade? What is the definition of a "whistleblower?" Does it include embedding intelligence assets to gather dirt?

The further Trump steps into the sh*t, the more the trolls come out. Think there could be a connection?

 

[westwall]

Whistleblower was proven to be correct

Given that his testimony is based on what he heard, his testimony is not very valuable.
However, the testimony and documentation of those that were there is highly valuable

The Whistleblower shined a spotlight on the stink of Trump. Up to the investigators after that

Liar! You haven't seen the whistleblower's testimony nor has he been cross-examined. Again, you're liar!

Gee. I thought this whistleblower was going to blow the pants of Trump and reveal the crimes he's committed??

Guess he wasn't as important as Shitforbrains led us all to believe. Now he doesn't need to testify at all??

Color me shocked.

What does the whistleblower know that was not secondhand info?

Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources

/----/ "Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources"
Other sources who were not on the actual phone call - you mean.
hear·say
/ˈhirˌsā/
noun

• 1.information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor: "according to rightwinger, Trump said dig up some dirt"

Other sources like Trumps own transcript and the Ukraine ambassador

You mean the transcript that your pissants were hoping would never see the light of day because it proves them liars... that one?

 

[Flash]

The pathetic thing is that these stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bats actually think this is their best shot at winning in 2020.

Of course when you are running on a platform of bat shit crazy socialism and know you can't get Americans to support you then I guess you will try anything.

 

[rightwinger]

Liar! You haven't seen the whistleblower's testimony nor has he been cross-examined. Again, you're liar!

Gee. I thought this whistleblower was going to blow the pants of Trump and reveal the crimes he's committed??

Guess he wasn't as important as Shitforbrains led us all to believe. Now he doesn't need to testify at all??

Color me shocked.

What does the whistleblower know that was not secondhand info?

Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources

/----/ "Everything he reported has been proven true by other sources"
Other sources who were not on the actual phone call - you mean.
hear·say
/ˈhirˌsā/
noun

• 1.information received from other people that one cannot adequately substantiate; rumor: "according to rightwinger, Trump said dig up some dirt"

Other sources like Trumps own transcript and the Ukraine ambassador

You mean the transcript that your pissants were hoping would never see the light of day because it proves them liars... that one?

It is a damning piece of information that shows intent and tying military aid to help in obtaining information on a political opponent

Keep in mind this is Trumps spin on what was said
We need to see what others said and did. Does not look good for Rudy

 

[rightwinger]

The pathetic thing is that these stupid TDS afflicted Moon Bats actually think this is their best shot at winning in 2020.

Of course when you are running on a platform of bat shit crazy socialism and know you can't get Americans to support you then I guess you will try anything.

I like the Dems platform
Healthcare
Environment
Higher education
Abortion
Assault weapons
Trumps unsuitability as President

Looks like a winner