Schiff says whistleblower (/leaker Eric Ciaramella) testimony is 'redundant and unnecessary'

[rightwinger]

Washington (CNN) — House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff made clear on Saturday that the Ukraine whistleblower won't be testifying in the impeachment inquiry, arguing that the individual's testimony would be "redundant and unnecessary."

House Republicans earlier Saturday had submitted a list of witnesses to Democrats that they'd like to testify as part of the chamber's impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump and Ukraine. The list included the whistleblower and former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden.

**SNIP**

"The impeachment inquiry, moreover, has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence -- from witnesses and documents, including the President's own words in his July 25 call record -- that not only confirms, but far exceeds, the initial information in the whistleblower's complaint. The whistleblower's testimony is therefore redundant and unnecessary. In light of the President's threats, the individual's appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk," Schiff wrote to California Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

The comments by Schiff, one of the Democrats in charge of the inquiry, are the clearest yet that the whistleblower won't testify in the probe, a dramatic shift since the beginning of the impeachment inquiry in September when the individual's testimony was viewed as paramount by all Democrats.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition-m.cnn.com ...

------------

The complete list of Eric Ciaramella’s ties to top DempnRAT operatives will SHOCK YOU!

** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.

** Ciaramella coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.

** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.

** The attorneys for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.

** Ciaramella worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.

** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.

** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.

Without fanfare or long verbage, Pelosi, Schiff & Nadler are going down the political drain within the next week or two, if they do not allow the Republican Party to have their choices of folks to come and testify on the Schiff committee!!! The American people are already wise to the 100% Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Media, farce, behind the locked door criminal & crooked, investigation.

This is EXACTLY what they do in the Soviet Union under despots and dictators.....

he’s right.

the allegation was that the blob withheld aid for a personal favor.

the edited transcript proves it

What edited transcript....you mean the one the Lt. Colonel was trying to edit to make it look like there was a quid quo Joe?

The one the blob released.

You are so fucking stupid that you actually think the president wrote that transcript....ROTFLMFAO....and THIS low 2 digit IQ'D asshole is who we have to deal with....no wonder it is so easy to slap you subversives down!

The President approved the transcript
Even an edited transcript is enough to impeach him

 

[edward37]

They are all Material Fact Witnesses. So is Adam Schiff and he needs to be put in the hot seat and asked questions under oath.

The topic is corruption in The Ukraine and Spies Leaking Classified Information, therefore anyone involved in that should be interviewed in public.

Why are you afraid of transparency and a fair process?

If you have nothing to hide, and want to get to the truth, you can’t intentionally avoid some
Facts and not others like Mueller did when he refused to investigate the origins of the Fake Russian Dirty Dossier.

IF YOU have nothing to hide why not honor all those subpoenas trump forbids them from honoring ?? Cowards traitors?

Same Psychology BS your side uses all the time..............Screw your subpoenas and this clown show. The Executive has powers..........and they have the right to use them. Not to mention those going there are entering a Perjury Crap over recollection...........It's what the Clowns do.........

Pound sand.........Personally, I think the Republicans in Congress shouldn't even show up for the hearings and let your Wacked out party play with themselves...........

Executive Powers do not include bribery, abuse of power and obstruction

They don't have to come forward with information that can be considered under Executive Powers.

Bribery..............where.......
Abuse of power..........term used by those that can't find a crime....nothing burger
Obstruction.......wah......we can't find anything after 3 years.....its a crying sound.

Trump withheld military aid unless Ukraine provided dirt on a political opponent

Both Bribery and abuse of powers

Demanding that your staff not testify and withholding official documents is obstruction

And if a crime was committed it makes no difference who called it in

 

[WEATHER53]

But...but...but...he must be hidden because he or someone else heard Trump say something they didn’t want to hear and now they must save the Nation.

 

[rightwinger]

IF YOU have nothing to hide why not honor all those subpoenas trump forbids them from honoring ?? Cowards traitors?

Same Psychology BS your side uses all the time..............Screw your subpoenas and this clown show. The Executive has powers..........and they have the right to use them. Not to mention those going there are entering a Perjury Crap over recollection...........It's what the Clowns do.........

Pound sand.........Personally, I think the Republicans in Congress shouldn't even show up for the hearings and let your Wacked out party play with themselves...........

Executive Powers do not include bribery, abuse of power and obstruction

They don't have to come forward with information that can be considered under Executive Powers.

Bribery..............where.......
Abuse of power..........term used by those that can't find a crime....nothing burger
Obstruction.......wah......we can't find anything after 3 years.....its a crying sound.

Trump withheld military aid unless Ukraine provided dirt on a political opponent

Both Bribery and abuse of powers

Demanding that your staff not testify and withholding official documents is obstruction

And if a crime was committed it makes no difference who called it in

The whistle blower is irrelevant
Everything he reported was proven to be true

The question is....why didn’t loyal Republicans report it?

 

[WEATHER53]

How can something supposedly said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent?

 

[rightwinger]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

 

[WEATHER53]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

 

[edward37]

How can something supposedly said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

Because many others verify it ....""You can't let that happen to me "" lol

 

[rightwinger]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

 

[WEATHER53]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

I will do it in crayon and all caps next time

 

[edward37]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

Know of weather for many years He never makes sense He's a hopeless republican kiss ass

 

[WEATHER53]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

Know of weather for many years He never makes sense He's a hopeless republican kiss ass

I don’t speak baby babble
Can another poster help these two “guys” out??

 

[cnm]

Can another poster help these two “guys” out??

Weather is bloviating. Hope that helps.

 

[edward37]

Can another poster help these two “guys” out??

Weather is bloviating. Hope that helps.

How's this weather?
Ukraine Aid Was Released After Federal Lawyers Said Trump Freeze Was Illegal:

 

[blackhawk]

 

[rightwinger]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

I will do it in crayon and all caps next time

Can’t be any worse

 

[rightwinger]

How can something said have been proven as true when the party who said it is unknown and very potentially non existent

What does that mean?

Whatever you can get from that, then it is yours.
Not looking to make conclusions for those incapable of reaching one.

Your babbling sentence makes no sense

Know of weather for many years He never makes sense He's a hopeless republican kiss ass

I don’t speak baby babble
Can another poster help these two “guys” out??

Yes you do

 

[The Purge]

Washington (CNN) — House Intelligence Chairman Adam Schiff made clear on Saturday that the Ukraine whistleblower won't be testifying in the impeachment inquiry, arguing that the individual's testimony would be "redundant and unnecessary."

House Republicans earlier Saturday had submitted a list of witnesses to Democrats that they'd like to testify as part of the chamber's impeachment inquiry into President Donald Trump and Ukraine. The list included the whistleblower and former Vice President Joe Biden's son Hunter Biden.

**SNIP**

"The impeachment inquiry, moreover, has gathered an ever-growing body of evidence -- from witnesses and documents, including the President's own words in his July 25 call record -- that not only confirms, but far exceeds, the initial information in the whistleblower's complaint. The whistleblower's testimony is therefore redundant and unnecessary. In light of the President's threats, the individual's appearance before us would only place their personal safety at grave risk," Schiff wrote to California Rep. Devin Nunes, the top Republican on the House Intelligence Committee.

The comments by Schiff, one of the Democrats in charge of the inquiry, are the clearest yet that the whistleblower won't testify in the probe, a dramatic shift since the beginning of the impeachment inquiry in September when the individual's testimony was viewed as paramount by all Democrats.

(Excerpt) Read more at edition-m.cnn.com ...

------------

The complete list of Eric Ciaramella’s ties to top DempnRAT operatives will SHOCK YOU!

** The so-called “whistleblower” Eric Ciarmella is a Democrat who had a “professional” tie to a 2020 Democrat.

** Ciaramella coordinated and took guidance from Adam Schiff’s staff and Schiff lied about it.

** Ciaramella’s attorneys worked for James Clapper, Hillary Clinton, Chuck Schumer, and donated to Joe Biden.

** The attorneys for Ciaramella is a member of the #Resistance.

** Ciaramella worked with Joe Biden in the executive branch when he was Vice President.

** Ciaramella traveled with Joe Biden to the Ukraine.

** Ciaramella worked with DNC operative Alexandra Chalupa in the creation of the Trump-Russia collusion hoax.

** A former associate of James Clapper, Charles McCullough, assisted Ciaramella with his complaint against Trump.

** And Adam Schiff’s aides, Abigail Grace and Sean Misko worked with Ciaramella in the White House.

Without fanfare or long verbage, Pelosi, Schiff & Nadler are going down the political drain within the next week or two, if they do not allow the Republican Party to have their choices of folks to come and testify on the Schiff committee!!! The American people are already wise to the 100% Pelosi, Schiff, Nadler, Media, farce, behind the locked door criminal & crooked, investigation.

This is EXACTLY what they do in the Soviet Union under despots and dictators.....

he’s right.

the allegation was that the blob withheld aid for a personal favor.

the edited transcript proves it

What edited transcript....you mean the one the Lt. Colonel was trying to edit to make it look like there was a quid quo Joe?

The one the blob released.

You are so fucking stupid that you actually think the president wrote that transcript....ROTFLMFAO....and THIS low 2 digit IQ'D asshole is who we have to deal with....no wonder it is so easy to slap you subversives down!

The President approved the transcript
Even an edited transcript is enough to impeach him

You di realized that the intel community did the editing and all Trump did was release it with NO CHANGES....No, you wouldn't have written such garbage trying to cut Trump down if you had a brain to usr... ROTFLMFAO, Wrongwinger you ARE our entertainment
...pathetic fool!

 

[rightwinger]

he’s right.

the allegation was that the blob withheld aid for a personal favor.

the edited transcript proves it

What edited transcript....you mean the one the Lt. Colonel was trying to edit to make it look like there was a quid quo Joe?

The one the blob released.

You are so fucking stupid that you actually think the president wrote that transcript....ROTFLMFAO....and THIS low 2 digit IQ'D asshole is who we have to deal with....no wonder it is so easy to slap you subversives down!

The President approved the transcript
Even an edited transcript is enough to impeach him

You di realized that the intel community did the editing and all Trump did was release it with NO CHANGES....No, you wouldn't have written such garbage trying to cut Trump down if you had a brain to usr... ROTFLMFAO, Wrongwinger you ARE our entertainment
...pathetic fool!

Why was anything edited?

 

[The Purge]

What edited transcript....you mean the one the Lt. Colonel was trying to edit to make it look like there was a quid quo Joe?

The one the blob released.

You are so fucking stupid that you actually think the president wrote that transcript....ROTFLMFAO....and THIS low 2 digit IQ'D asshole is who we have to deal with....no wonder it is so easy to slap you subversives down!

The President approved the transcript
Even an edited transcript is enough to impeach him

You di realized that the intel community did the editing and all Trump did was release it with NO CHANGES....No, you wouldn't have written such garbage trying to cut Trump down if you had a brain to usr... ROTFLMFAO, Wrongwinger you ARE our entertainment
...pathetic fool!

Why was anything edited?

Why do you edit and REDACT classified information?.....You double up on your DUMB PILLS on a Sunday?