Billo_Really
Litre of the Band
- Thread starter
- #141
I provided the link. It's not my problem if you're too lazy to use it.How old were these idiots, 12?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I provided the link. It's not my problem if you're too lazy to use it.How old were these idiots, 12?
The better 44%. Not to be confused with the Trump bottom feeders.44% of 2,002 people....
Well, I think I'll just leave it at that
Someone commenting on the poll is not indifference. The only other option is anger. We can tell by your post.Someone can’t tell the difference between anger and indifference. The poll is meaningless but if it makes you on the left feel like it’s some great deal whatever these are the same polls that said Romney would win big in 2012 and Hillary would in 2016 so enjoy.Someone seems angry.BFD that and quarter won’t get you shit.
O'rly?The Left finding comfort in a moronic poll.
Hilarious.
O'rly?Dems, and polls... Theres a song in there somewhere. Something Bluesey
Averted another corrupt GOP full blown depression, passed the most important social reform since the 60s, still working despite ridiculous GOP and crony insurers sabotage. Got respect back from the world, Many great executive orders and tolerance 4 gays Etc...Now ask a Democrat to name one thing Obama accomplished in 8 years.
You can comment on something without really caring about it perfect example I’m responding to you even though I don’t give a flip about you or what you think nor do I have any anger towards you. Mostly I feel sympathy for you and the other lefties who have to look to silly polls like this to feel like you have some type of big win. Enjoy your irrelevant poll I’m moving on.Someone commenting on the poll is not indifference. The only other option is anger. We can tell by your post.Someone can’t tell the difference between anger and indifference. The poll is meaningless but if it makes you on the left feel like it’s some great deal whatever these are the same polls that said Romney would win big in 2012 and Hillary would in 2016 so enjoy.Someone seems angry.BFD that and quarter won’t get you shit.
Not after the FBI went public with their investigation on her. However, she did win the popular vote. And the only reason Trump got the majority electoral votes, was due to un-Constitutional, hyper-partisan, gerrymandering.Hillary will win by a landslide.
The majority of Americans want liberal and progressive leaders. Despite what sparsely populated rural districts (with the same electoral votes as densely populated urban districts) want.Popular in NY and LA is meaningless as you were shown in the last election. You believe your own polls too much.
It's not a lie to say she won the popular vote. It's also not a lie showing the only way Trump won was because of un-Constitutional gerrymandering at the State level.As stated to you liars over and over, the popular vote has NEVER elected a president and never will.
The majority of Americans want liberal and progressive leaders. Despite what sparsely populated rural districts (with the same electoral votes as densely populated urban districts) want.Popular in NY and LA is meaningless as you were shown in the last election. You believe your own polls too much.
I thought you'd never ask...And the only reason Trump got the majority electoral votes, was due to un-Constitutional, hyper-partisan, gerrymandering.
Wow!
One of the dumbest claims I've ever heard.
Now back it up.
But it should be representative of the population. If a district has more people, then it should have more electoral votes.That’s why we have the EC so that we are not ruled by a geographic political minority.
But it should be representative of the population. If a district has more people, then it should have more electoral votes.That’s why we have the EC so that we are not ruled by a geographic political minority.
I thought you'd never ask...And the only reason Trump got the majority electoral votes, was due to un-Constitutional, hyper-partisan, gerrymandering.
Wow!
One of the dumbest claims I've ever heard.
Now back it up.
analysis shows how gerrymandering benefited GOP in 2016
The analysis found four times as many states with Republican-skewed state House or Assembly districts than Democratic ones.
You just provided a link which shows gerrymandering benefited the House. You did not provide one which shows gerrymandering increased Trump's electoral votes.I thought you'd never ask...And the only reason Trump got the majority electoral votes, was due to un-Constitutional, hyper-partisan, gerrymandering.
Wow!
One of the dumbest claims I've ever heard.
Now back it up.
analysis shows how gerrymandering benefited GOP in 2016
The analysis found four times as many states with Republican-skewed state House or Assembly districts than Democratic ones.
Half-negro.Token negro .
O'rly?Someone can’t tell the difference between anger and indifference. The poll is meaningless but if it makes you on the left feel like it’s some great deal whatever these are the same polls that said Romney would win big in 2012 and Hillary would in 2016 so enjoy.Someone seems angry.BFD that and quarter won’t get you shit.
48 states are "winner-take-all" states. Whoever gets the majority of votes in that state wins all the electoral votes for that state. So no amount of district gerrymandering can rig who wins the electoral votes for those 48 states.However, she did win the popular vote. And the only reason Trump got the majority electoral votes, was due to un-Constitutional, hyper-partisan, gerrymandering.