Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Mark Levins show last night discussed how the courts judgement was unconstitutional according to the 8th Amendment of the Constitution This type of case has happened and been adjudicated according to the 8th amendment of the Constitution by the Supreme Court. The Judgement was 9-0 with Ruth Badger Ginsberg reading the judgement!Timbs v. Indiana was a criminal case not a disgorgement case.
WW
Mark Levins show last night discussed how the courts judgement was unconstitutional according to the 8th Amendment of the Constitution This type of case has happened and been adjudicated according to the 8th amendment of the Constitution by the Supreme Court. The Judgement was 9-0 with Ruth Badger Ginsberg reading the judgement!
it's called stealingAnd the fines go to NYC/NYC State. This is exactly what the 8th Amendment was written for.
~~~~~~Timbs v. Indiana was a criminal case not a disgorgement case.
WW
what part of excessive do you have issues with?View attachment 908812
View attachment 908813
Not Timbs was not a Civil Case, it was a criminal case. The SCOTUS decision in the case involved a criminal case and civil forgeture unter a criminal system.
It had nothing to do with a Civil Case of disgorgement. Disgorgement being the removal of illegally obtained assets in New York for persistent fraudulent and illegal business activites.
WW
right, still excessive per the constitution, no matter what. Funny how demofks can't get out of their own way.~~~~~~
It doesn't make any difference whether it's a Civil or Criminal case. the 8th Amendment to the Constitution does not that distinction.
~~~~~~
It doesn't make any difference whether it's a Civil or Criminal case. the 8th Amendment to the Constitution does not that distinction.
what part of excessive do you have issues with?
Mark Levins is a media talking head.
Try reading the decision, Timbs was a criminal case.
WW
Wouldn't persistent fraudulent and illegal activities be considered criminal?View attachment 908812
View attachment 908813
Disgorgement being the removal of illegally obtained assets in New York for persistent fraudulent and illegal business activites.
WW
He should send his legal brief. Will he be managing the appeal? He should get his cash up front.Mark Levins show last night discussed how the courts judgement was unconstitutional according to the 8th Amendment of the Constitution This type of case has happened and been adjudicated according to the 8th amendment of the Constitution by the Supreme Court. The Judgement was 9-0 with Ruth Badger Ginsberg reading the judgement!
Wouldn't persistent fraudulent and illegal activities be considered criminal?
He's also a lawyer and was chief of staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese under Reagan. I think he knows the law.Mark Levins is a media talking head.
WW
He's also a lawyer and was chief of staff for Attorney General Edwin Meese under Reagan. I think he knows the law.
4/5 qualified experts on appraisal valuation methods hit the stand and it’s game over in one day for this witch hunting, election interfering bunch
It makes a HUGE difference on how the case will be looked at by the courts.
The 8th applies to punishments (fines, etc.), disgorgement (restitution based on illegal activity) are two very different things.
Disgorgement isn't a fine. It's the removal of ill-gotten gains
WW
Chief of Staff? That isn't dealing with the law, it means he scheduled Meese's phone calls and calendar.
Levin hasn't been a practicing attorney for 2 decades, he's an entertainer that makes money off the gullible.
WW
Considering there were no victims in the fraud case, the lenders were paid back on time and were willing to loan Trump more money — the fine was excessive.Who says the fine is excessive?
