- Nov 10, 2019
- 46,321
- 29,333
Ahhh.., "collusion" such a menacing, ugly, romantic word to conjure evil in the mind, but legally not much to write home about.As well he should be. The only 2016 Russian collusion was perpetrated by him.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ahhh.., "collusion" such a menacing, ugly, romantic word to conjure evil in the mind, but legally not much to write home about.As well he should be. The only 2016 Russian collusion was perpetrated by him.
Calm down lib... we have been here before... russia russia russia... all over again... same playbook... same coach....We'll, tonight they exposed Trumps treason by revealing he stole Top secret nuclear documents; FBI found document on foreign nuclear defenses at Mar-a-Lago – report
Not surprising Mueller did not show collusion. As he stated within the first page or two, he wasn't looking for collusion, but crimes that could be prosecuted. Sure that report showed some things morally ambiguous and just plane wrong, but Mueller and other lawyers are in the right and wrong business. They are in the legal and illegal business. Collusion has a romantic sound but no teeth, no fines, no jail sentences of the Federal books. Even trump knew this, and part of the reason he liked to talk about during the investigation in the crimes.
As far as Durham goes, you are right. But provable, prosecutable evidense is where it's at. The rest amounts to bullshit. We are pretty well in agreement on that investigation, and frankly I expected more, as it appears did trump and the trump crowd.
Actually you did, dimwit.I didn't write the laws. Don't look at me.
You lefties are SO goddamn gullible.We'll, tonight they exposed Trumps treason by revealing he stole Top secret nuclear documents; FBI found document on foreign nuclear defenses at Mar-a-Lago – report
Yep, Hillary is doing all of this...![]()
Hats Off to Hillary: Prosecuting Trump in the Shadow of Clinton’s Emails
Below is my column in the Hill on the recent focus on obstruction as a possible charge against former President Donald Trump. There is no question that the filings reflect a belief that the Trump t…jonathanturley.org
Accountable for what?Funny, I remember the Nixon days, when the right wing was still willing to hold their lawless assholes accountable. Not any more.
Tucker Carlson???You lefties are SO goddamn gullible.
You're thoroughly brainwashed. You'll believe ANYTHING that spews out of the TV set.
When got nothing go for the old Child Sex stuff...Notice how this Democrat is totally cool with the child sex shows protected by an idea.
Over the years, beginning with Limbaugh, they've become absolutely convinced that ANY "news source" -- as long as they like what is said, and even if that "source" is just one guy sitting in his basement repeating other conspiracies, fabrications and rumors -- is MORE reliable and credible than ANY major news outlet, those with resources literally scattered all over the world.Tucker Carlson???
Some glass house you got there...
The sources BWK is using has a litany of Pulitzer prizes to their name...
Fox Corp sued so they could lie more, they classified themselves as News Entertainment...
Yep, Hillary is doing all of this...
She is in her secret lair planning all of this..
Hillary was living rent free in Trumpster's heads, now she getting expansion...
Over the years, beginning with Limbaugh, they've become absolutely convinced that ANY "news source" -- as long as they like what is said, and even if that "source" is just one guy sitting in his basement repeating other conspiracies, fabrications and rumors -- is MORE reliable and credible than ANY major news outlet, those with resources literally scattered all over the world.
LITERALLY. They believe that, down to their bones. As instructed.
I'm glad you didn't try to deny my post.Let me guess. It has to come from cnn, msnbc, fox, or network news to be true. Lol.
You aren't looking for Russian Collusion is you completely ignore Clinton, Biden, and Obama and their lackeys in the FBI and DOJ."Not surprising Mueller did not show collusion. As he stated within the first page or two, he wasn't looking for collusion, but crimes that could be prosecuted."
Huh? He certainly was looking for collusion and who did it on our side. And theirs.
The order appointing me as Special Counsel directed our Office to investigate Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election. This included investigating any links or coordination between the Russian government and individuals associated with the Trump campaign. It also included investigating efforts to interfere with, or obstruct, the investigation.
That is the definition of collusion. He WAS looking for it, but didn't find it for the simple reason that there was none by Trump or members of his campaign. Whether it was illegal or not or prosecutable is beside the point. We needed to know what happened and what needed to be done to prevent future interferences. It was not only about any illegalities.
![]()
Read Robert Mueller's opening statement: Russian interference among 'most serious' challenges to American democracy
Mueller was testifying Wednesday for hours on Capitol Hill about his investigation into Russian interference, possible coordination by members of President Donald Trump's campaign and possible obstruction of justice by Trump himself.www.cnbc.com
It seems clear to me that members of the Mueller investigating team took that order too far, once they found nothing to indicate any collusion on the part of the Trump campaign they went looking for anything else they could find and ended up with evidence of wrong-doing that was totally unconnected to their stated mission. And that is flat out wrong, they should not have used that authority to go after anything they could find. That investigation should have ended in it's 1st year IMHO; after that it became a political effort to damage Trump and his administration.
Stop lyingOver the years, beginning with Limbaugh, they've become absolutely convinced that ANY "news source" -- as long as they like what is said, and even if that "source" is just one guy sitting in his basement repeating other conspiracies, fabrications and rumors -- is MORE reliable and credible than ANY major news outlet, those with resources literally scattered all over the world.
LITERALLY. They believe that, down to their bones. As instructed.
I'm glad you didn't try to deny my post.
Witnesses you idiot. Get a clue. Trump violated the Esponage Act; Nuclear angle to Mar-a-Lago scandal comes into sharper focusCalm down lib... we have been here before... russia russia russia... all over again... same playbook... same coach....
View attachment 692767
"The Post, citing unnamed sources, did not identify the foreign government named in the document describing the country’s military defenses"