James Woods to sue over DNC for telling Twitter to ban him from Twitter

[OKTexas]

Yes they can. He is saying they didn't block him over what they wanted but what the DNC wanted. Now I am not saying it happened but if it did, I would not bet against him.

Musk released the records to prove it happened. There are no "ifs" involved.

.

 

[busybee01]

The facts are out. There was collusion. Are you going to be stupid forever?

You and facts are strangers. There was no collusion.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Yes they can. He is saying they didn't block him over what they wanted but what the DNC wanted. Now I am not saying it happened but if it did, I would not bet against him.

Why? The DNC is just a private entity no different than Twitter.

 

[boedicca]

You and facts are strangers. There was no collusion.

Oh, you poor widdle gullible dweeb.

 

[pknopp]

Musk released the records to prove it happened. There are no "ifs" involved.

.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, we have heard these kind of things many times. Just because someone claims to have done something does not mean they have.

Has Trump released Obama's birth certificate yet?

 

[jc456]

You and facts are strangers. There was no collusion.

Like you actually know!!! Nice condescending statement

 

[Marener]

Musk released the records to prove it happened. There are no "ifs" involved.

.

Incorrect. They are not proof that Twitter did anything they didn’t want to do.

Even if they did, the lawsuit is still baseless.

 

[boedicca]

Why? The DNC is just a private entity no different than Twitter.

Biden didn't stop pressuring Twitter once he took office, bub.

 

[pknopp]

Why? The DNC is just a private entity no different than Twitter.

I already addressed this.

 

[OKTexas]

Why wouldn't he just sue Twitter?

the DNC has no power over Twitter; they are a private entity and so in Twitter


What this does show is why washed up celebrities find it so easy to fleece republican voters.....their cognitive skills are zero....

It's called collusion, look it up. Also the public company that existed at the time of the collusion no longer exist. It's a private company now.

.

 

[busybee01]

Then why would government demofks send emails to ban people. That’s called government interference

The DNC is not a part of the government.

 

[jc456]

Incorrect. They are not proof that Twitter did anything they didn’t want to do.

Even if they did, the lawsuit is still baseless.

We’ll see huh?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

The facts are out. There was collusion. Are you going to be stupid forever?

Can you link to the law that makes collusion between two private entities illegal?

 

[jc456]

The DNC is not a part of the government.

It’s not about the goberment prick

 

[surada]

No matter what happened in his career there is no excuse for targeting anyone for their political opinions. period.

Woods isn't being targeted. He's being treated like everyone else on Twitter.

 

[jc456]

Woods isn't being targeted. He's being treated like everyone else on Twitter.

We’ll see huh?

 

[busybee01]

Musk released the records to prove it happened. There are no "ifs" involved.

.

He did not. He did not prove that there was any collusion. All he proved is that the DNC sent a complaint to Twitter. Twitter examined the tweets and made a decision. That is not collusion. Anyone can send a e-mail to Twitter complaining.

 

[Marener]

We’ll see huh?

We won’t. This is how this stupid litigation works. He’s only doing this for attention. You’ll never hear about the dismissal.

 

[busybee01]

False modesty is so unbecoming. You should proudly embrace and proclaim your deep and abiding affection for sewers. After all, you were spawned in one.

You are the one who came out of the sewers. That is where all Trump supporters reside.

 

[jc456]

We won’t. This is how this stupid litigation works. He’s only doing this for attention. You’ll never hear about the dismissal.

We’ll see huh?