Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Stupid, stupid reactionaries like Frank wonder why women and minorities and Hispanics continue to vote against his types?
Medicaid?
What happened before that program?
Were the poor just dying in the streets?
Programs that increase real growth and free market competition
to create jobs would do more for people and the US in the long run
Before the Great Society, poverty was decreasing at quick rate.
Since the Great Society, the levels have remained, relatively the same.
There is no benefit in that... creating a dependent class and stratifying society.
granted it was implied
but the answer is yes
Snarly, have a 2nd cupgranted it was implied
but the answer is yes
I would think that 4 years would be enough time for you to have been able to learn to use the quote feature.
The question is
whose lives would better now if Medicaid had never been created?
Stupid, stupid reactionaries like Frank wonder why women and minorities and Hispanics continue to vote against his types?
January 8, 2014 will mark the 50th Anniversary of LBJ "War on Poverty"
Let's take the time to properly remember what's been accomplished these past 50 years.
The War continues to consume a few trillion ANNUALLY with no end in sight and not even an exit strategy. Then again, we need to ask, what is victory and who is winning? Clearly, the poor are not winning. They continue to remain unemployed, live in inner city housing, sending their kids to horrific government institutions know as "schools" or then to prison.
The biggest casualty in the Democrat War on Poor People has been the black male head of household, who has been almost totally exterminated.
The biggest winner is the Democrat Party who continues to use this same failed strategy, year after year, election cycle after election cycle, and generation after generation until there's nothing left, like in Detroit.
Congratulation to the Democrats for their 50 Year long "War on Poverty"
Like all liberal ideas, it failed b/c cons didn't let them spend more.
I haven't read the thread yet, but by page 4 someone lib will claim that.
Snarly, have a 2nd cupgranted it was implied
but the answer is yes
I would think that 4 years would be enough time for you to have been able to learn to use the quote feature.
The question is
whose lives would better now if Medicaid had never been created?
Well since Medicaid is normally for the poor
it just seemed obvious
So yes, the poor would be better off (the "whose" in your question)
if we promoted plans that created real growth
instead of ones that create a dependent class
Snarly, have a 2nd cupI would think that 4 years would be enough time for you to have been able to learn to use the quote feature.
The question is
whose lives would better now if Medicaid had never been created?
Well since Medicaid is normally for the poor
it just seemed obvious
So yes, the poor would be better off (the "whose" in your question)
if we promoted plans that created real growth
instead of ones that create a dependent class
Does providing public education to poor children discourage poor parents from trying to get jobs, or better jobs, so they can afford private school?
We know that the DNC is the party of lies, here are just some of their classics:
1. The DNC is helping the poor.
2. The DNC helps and supports blacks.
3. The DNC is the party for women.
4. The DNC is the party for the working class.
Snarly, have a 2nd cupgranted it was implied
but the answer is yes
I would think that 4 years would be enough time for you to have been able to learn to use the quote feature.
The question is
whose lives would better now if Medicaid had never been created?
Well since Medicaid is normally for the poor
it just seemed obvious
So yes, the poor would be better off (the "whose" in your question)
if we promoted plans that created real growth
instead of ones that create a dependent class
Stupid, stupid reactionaries like Frank wonder why women and minorities and Hispanics continue to vote against his types?
Yeah we just want them to be successful. Imagine that.
Stupid, stupid reactionaries like Frank wonder why women and minorities and Hispanics continue to vote against his types?
no, becasue like you , some folks are incapable of thinking, crafting an argument and just accept what they are told to and reflexivity deny/ignore anything challenging their view.
Snarly, have a 2nd cupI would think that 4 years would be enough time for you to have been able to learn to use the quote feature.
The question is
whose lives would better now if Medicaid had never been created?
Well since Medicaid is normally for the poor
it just seemed obvious
So yes, the poor would be better off (the "whose" in your question)
if we promoted plans that created real growth
instead of ones that create a dependent class
So ending Medicaid would do what? "Encourage" people to get jobs? Encourage them to end their dependency?
Snarly, have a 2nd cup
Well since Medicaid is normally for the poor
it just seemed obvious
So yes, the poor would be better off (the "whose" in your question)
if we promoted plans that created real growth
instead of ones that create a dependent class
So ending Medicaid would do what? "Encourage" people to get jobs? Encourage them to end their dependency?
Is the failing Progressive program really the way to go?
Worse than apartheid: Black in Obama's American
Black South Africans under apartheid had a median net worth about 6.8% that of white South Africans.
The average white household iin the US has a net worth of $110,729.
Black Americans median net worth is less than 5 percent that of white Americans.
$4,955 to exact
h/t Kevin D. Williamson
Stupid, stupid reactionaries like Frank wonder why women and minorities and Hispanics continue to vote against his types?
how is it reactionary?
welfare failed
any logical, open minded look will tell any honest person that
