Jaw-Dropping Liberalism

[Slade3200]

1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

By any objective measure Phelps and his crew of dingbats (for example) represent a FAR right (aka radical) deviation from the generally accepted existing political center (aka societal norm) so do any number of other radical right wing organizations (say hello to those pro-Sharia organizations while you're at it), to argue otherwise would be to contend that these miscreants aren't radicals (or aren't right wing) which would get you laughed out of any serious discussion even with a completely conservative audience.

So yeah it does in fact exist the only argument that remains is to what degree, you might argue that they represent an inconsequential minority with little to no influence on public policy but to say they don't exist at all is preposterous.

Gee....looks like our pal NightFox went night-night.

I'm gonna assume that he couldn't meet the challenge that I offered..." see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing."


That doesn't mean that I can't provide lots more examples of positions that show that the Right is consistent with American traditions, values, and history ....hence, represent that center.

There is no 'Far Right.'

Let's take the most central of American values: free speech.

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."


Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



Any who have fallen for the Leftist attempt to claim that there is a "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

What's up with the long rants. Keep it simple stupid... KISS.

Far right would be anybody wanting to ban Muslims, jail women for having an abortion, make gay marriage illegal... do I really need to keep going?

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

 

[PoliticalChic]

1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.

By any objective measure Phelps and his crew of dingbats (for example) represent a FAR right (aka radical) deviation from the generally accepted existing political center (aka societal norm) so do any number of other radical right wing organizations (say hello to those pro-Sharia organizations while you're at it), to argue otherwise would be to contend that these miscreants aren't radicals (or aren't right wing) which would get you laughed out of any serious discussion even with a completely conservative audience.

So yeah it does in fact exist the only argument that remains is to what degree, you might argue that they represent an inconsequential minority with little to no influence on public policy but to say they don't exist at all is preposterous.

Gee....looks like our pal NightFox went night-night.

I'm gonna assume that he couldn't meet the challenge that I offered..." see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing."


That doesn't mean that I can't provide lots more examples of positions that show that the Right is consistent with American traditions, values, and history ....hence, represent that center.

There is no 'Far Right.'

Let's take the most central of American values: free speech.

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."


Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



Any who have fallen for the Leftist attempt to claim that there is a "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

What's up with the long rants. Keep it simple stupid... KISS.

Far right would be anybody wanting to ban Muslims, jail women for having an abortion, make gay marriage illegal... do I really need to keep going?

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

 

[Slade3200]

By any objective measure Phelps and his crew of dingbats (for example) represent a FAR right (aka radical) deviation from the generally accepted existing political center (aka societal norm) so do any number of other radical right wing organizations (say hello to those pro-Sharia organizations while you're at it), to argue otherwise would be to contend that these miscreants aren't radicals (or aren't right wing) which would get you laughed out of any serious discussion even with a completely conservative audience.

So yeah it does in fact exist the only argument that remains is to what degree, you might argue that they represent an inconsequential minority with little to no influence on public policy but to say they don't exist at all is preposterous.

Gee....looks like our pal NightFox went night-night.

I'm gonna assume that he couldn't meet the challenge that I offered..." see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing."


That doesn't mean that I can't provide lots more examples of positions that show that the Right is consistent with American traditions, values, and history ....hence, represent that center.

There is no 'Far Right.'

Let's take the most central of American values: free speech.

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."


Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



Any who have fallen for the Leftist attempt to claim that there is a "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

What's up with the long rants. Keep it simple stupid... KISS.

Far right would be anybody wanting to ban Muslims, jail women for having an abortion, make gay marriage illegal... do I really need to keep going?

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gee....looks like our pal NightFox went night-night.

I'm gonna assume that he couldn't meet the challenge that I offered..." see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing."


That doesn't mean that I can't provide lots more examples of positions that show that the Right is consistent with American traditions, values, and history ....hence, represent that center.

There is no 'Far Right.'

Let's take the most central of American values: free speech.

The Obama administration is easily proven to be Far Left: he advanced, to a seat on the Supreme Court, a radical who does not believe in free speech, the first amendment.

"In her 1993 article "Regulation of Hate Speech and Pornography After R.A.V," for the University of Chicago Law Review, Kagan writes:

"I take it as a given that we live in a society marred by racial and gender inequality, that certain forms of speech perpetuate and promote this inequality, and that the uncoerced disappearance of such speech would be cause for great elation."



In a 1996 paper, "Private Speech, Public Purpose: The Role of Governmental Motive in First Amendment Doctrine," Kagan argued it may be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.
That paper asserted First Amendment doctrine is comprised of "motives and ... actions infested with them" and she goes so far as to claim that "First Amendment law is best understood and most readily explained as a kind of motive-hunting."


Kagan's name was also on a brief, United States V. Stevens, dug up by the Washington Examiner, stating: "Whether a given category of speech enjoys First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical balancing of the value of the speech against its societal costs."

If the government doesn't like what you say, Elena Kagan believes it is the duty of courts to tell you to shut up. If some pantywaist is offended by what you say, Elena Kagan believes your words can be "disappeared".
WyBlog -- Elena Kagan's America: some speech can be "disappeared"
Elena Kagan Radical anti-gun nut?



Any want to deny that free speech is at the center of American tradition???
Anyone?



So....as far as the concept of free speech in America, where do we find the radical position?
Hence, far left.



Any who have fallen for the Leftist attempt to claim that there is a "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

What's up with the long rants. Keep it simple stupid... KISS.

Far right would be anybody wanting to ban Muslims, jail women for having an abortion, make gay marriage illegal... do I really need to keep going?

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

 

[Slade3200]

What's up with the long rants. Keep it simple stupid... KISS.

Far right would be anybody wanting to ban Muslims, jail women for having an abortion, make gay marriage illegal... do I really need to keep going?

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

 

[Slade3200]

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

You know what... forget about my last question. I got sucked into the vortex of stupidity that your hot air has been blowing towards. Here's the deal, try and follow.

When you have two opposing ideologies where one side is "Pro" and the other side is "against" when it comes to a variety of issues, it creates a spectrum. In this case we are calling it the "Right wing" and the "Left wing" If somebody subscribes or agrees with everything that the left believes then they are far left, same goes for those that believe everything on the "Right" Those who agree with some issues from one side and some from the other are moderates. Thats how it works. There is a Far Right and a Far Left. You can't debate that it is fact. End of story.

Now if you want to start talking about "Radicals" which address the degree that some people take their beliefs, we can talk about that, but it is a different discussion, one I don't think i have the patients to have with you today. It is way too nice outside...

 

[PoliticalChic]

Gads, you're a moron.

The Right endorses the Constitution, which gives the President the power to set foreign policy for the purpose of protecting the people of America.Maintaining our sovereignty is a traditional American value....nothing 'far' about it.

To prove what a lying oaf you are, find any Right wing leader who has demanded 'jailing women for having an abortion."



"make gay marriage legal" is far from a traditional American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.


I can give other examples as necessary.


If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

You know what... forget about my last question. I got sucked into the vortex of stupidity that your hot air has been blowing towards. Here's the deal, try and follow.

When you have two opposing ideologies where one side is "Pro" and the other side is "against" when it comes to a variety of issues, it creates a spectrum. In this case we are calling it the "Right wing" and the "Left wing" If somebody subscribes or agrees with everything that the left believes then they are far left, same goes for those that believe everything on the "Right" Those who agree with some issues from one side and some from the other are moderates. Thats how it works. There is a Far Right and a Far Left. You can't debate that it is fact. End of story.

Now if you want to start talking about "Radicals" which address the degree that some people take their beliefs, we can talk about that, but it is a different discussion, one I don't think i have the patients to have with you today. It is way too nice outside...

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Still can't come up with any conservative positions 'far' from the center of traditional American beliefs and values?


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left



1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?





2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,

LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..



6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.

A radical and Progressive position.

He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.




There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

....see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

 

[Slade3200]

Lady, with all the words you use you sure don't say much... you aren't ever going to be able to prove your point because it defies logic. A normal conservative that represents the Right support the values of the right. Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned. They are only a small fraction just as the far left is a small fraction. People like you try to paint everybody on the left as an extremist and claim that there is no extreme on the Right. Who are you trying to fool? What a joke

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Haha, I knew you couldn't answer a simple question... nevermind that though, I proved the "far right" in my last post. stay in denial if you must. Not sure if your ego can take being proven wrong, wouldn't want you to short circuit.

 

[Slade3200]

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

You know what... forget about my last question. I got sucked into the vortex of stupidity that your hot air has been blowing towards. Here's the deal, try and follow.

When you have two opposing ideologies where one side is "Pro" and the other side is "against" when it comes to a variety of issues, it creates a spectrum. In this case we are calling it the "Right wing" and the "Left wing" If somebody subscribes or agrees with everything that the left believes then they are far left, same goes for those that believe everything on the "Right" Those who agree with some issues from one side and some from the other are moderates. Thats how it works. There is a Far Right and a Far Left. You can't debate that it is fact. End of story.

Now if you want to start talking about "Radicals" which address the degree that some people take their beliefs, we can talk about that, but it is a different discussion, one I don't think i have the patients to have with you today. It is way too nice outside...

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Still can't come up with any conservative positions 'far' from the center of traditional American beliefs and values?


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left



1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?





2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,

LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..



6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.

A radical and Progressive position.

He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.




There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

....see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Before you show off your lack of critical thinking skills with another copy and paste response how about you actually read my posts. I just disproved everything that you are saying. Deflecting back to your old bloated stale arguments doesn't change things. You're done. I'm not reading your long ass BS rants anymore, if you want engagement keep it concise and on subject... Stop wasting my time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

"Those in the "far right" are pushing for extreme changes as I mentioned."

I destroyed everything you mentioned.

QED....there is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Keep trying....and wipe that drool off your chin.

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Haha, I knew you couldn't answer a simple question... nevermind that though, I proved the "far right" in my last post. stay in denial if you must. Not sure if your ego can take being proven wrong, wouldn't want you to short circuit.

I believe the readers will recognize you as a liar.

You have yet to provide a single example of a radical position by conservatives, the right wing.

I have posted several of the Far Left's...


How about a few more?
8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,
"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.

Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???

Oh...wait....


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"

Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???

Could there?


10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.



And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Still waiting.

 

[Slade3200]

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Haha, I knew you couldn't answer a simple question... nevermind that though, I proved the "far right" in my last post. stay in denial if you must. Not sure if your ego can take being proven wrong, wouldn't want you to short circuit.

I believe the reads will recognize you as a liar.

You have yet to provide a single example of a radical position by conservatives, the right wing.

I have posted several of the Far Left's...


How about a few more?
8. Under Roosevelt's NRA, most manufacturing industries were suddenly forced into government-mandated cartels. Codes that regulated prices and terms of sale briefly transformed much of the American economy into a fascist-style arrangement,
"... into a fascist-style arrangement,..."
"A New Jersey tailor named Jacob Maged was arrested and sent to jail for the “crime” of pressing a suit of clothes for 35 cents rather than the NRA-inspired “Tailor’s Code” of 40 cents."
No surprise here: FDR's New Deal was a copy of Mussolini's economic program.

Could anything short of setting up concentration camps for our citizens, be more radical???

Oh...wait....


9. How about The Far Left's Gender-Agenda., versus the Right's stand for tradition and reality: "Republicans Battle to Roll Back Washington's New Transgender Bathroom Rules"

Really....could there be a more pertinent example of the radical, insane Far Left's corruption of tradition and history???

Could there?


10. The corruption of the press by the Far Left: the JournoList Scandal: hundreds of Leftist journalists plotted to minimize negative publicity surrounding Obama’s radical ties. They plotted to smear the other side with lies. Peter Zenger....spinnning in his grave.



And several times, I've presented this challenge: If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



Still waiting.

not reading this shit. Speak for yourself and keep it to a few sentences if you want engagement. I'm tired of your BS.

 

[regent]

Compared to the world the US was born in the leftist mode and continues on that path. Even General MacArthur noted this when he said, "For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers of all the ages and the charter they produced of the liberal revolution of their time has never been and is not now surpassed in liberal thought."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Compared to the world the US was born in the leftist mode and continues on that path. Even General MacArthur noted this when he said, "For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers of all the ages and the charter they produced of the liberal revolution of their time has never been and is not now surpassed in liberal thought."

In addition to being a fool, you're a liar as well.

"For the framers of the Constitution were the most liberal thinkers..."

Classical liberals....believers in individualism, free markets and limited constitutional government.

Roosevelt was a socialist/communist/collectivist, and never endorsed any of the beliefs above.
That's why he embraced homicidal murderer Joseph Stalin as his soul mate.



Did I mention that in addition to being a fool, you're a liar as well?

 

[PoliticalChic]

You didn't "destroy" anything. Making irrational arguments proves nothing. Here, since you like the wordy copy and paste stuff I'll give you a nice article to ready about the far right.
» The Rise of the Far Right

Policy wise. Far rightys would call for deportation of all illegal immigrants, the abolition of the department of education and energy and EPA... defunding public schools, cutting Medicare and Medicaid, etc etc

I already made the point of gay and abortion rights but those seemed to go right through that wind tunnel inbetween your ears. I'm guessing the rest of this post will do the same.

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

You know what... forget about my last question. I got sucked into the vortex of stupidity that your hot air has been blowing towards. Here's the deal, try and follow.

When you have two opposing ideologies where one side is "Pro" and the other side is "against" when it comes to a variety of issues, it creates a spectrum. In this case we are calling it the "Right wing" and the "Left wing" If somebody subscribes or agrees with everything that the left believes then they are far left, same goes for those that believe everything on the "Right" Those who agree with some issues from one side and some from the other are moderates. Thats how it works. There is a Far Right and a Far Left. You can't debate that it is fact. End of story.

Now if you want to start talking about "Radicals" which address the degree that some people take their beliefs, we can talk about that, but it is a different discussion, one I don't think i have the patients to have with you today. It is way too nice outside...

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Still can't come up with any conservative positions 'far' from the center of traditional American beliefs and values?


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left



1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?





2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,

LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..



6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.

A radical and Progressive position.

He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.




There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

....see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Before you show off your lack of critical thinking skills with another copy and paste response how about you actually read my posts. I just disproved everything that you are saying. Deflecting back to your old bloated stale arguments doesn't change things. You're done. I'm not reading your long ass BS rants anymore, if you want engagement keep it concise and on subject... Stop wasting my time.

Although I have provided numerous examples of Far Left aims, you have been unable to step up to this simple challenge:
see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



You can't because there is no Far Right.

You've served your purpose.....dismissed.

 

[danielpalos]

I wonder how many Liberal guys are trying to get Caitlyn Jenner's phone number.

They certainly don't wanna lose their Liberal creds.

When are women going to be more than mostly all political talk and mostly no political action, even in the non-porn sector?

 

[regent]

I destroyed it once....but, as you are a slow learner...let's destroy it again.

Traditional marriage is a time-honored American value.
1. There is no "Far Right" in this country.
As is always important ....let's define terms.


The terms far right and far left are relative to some understood center.
To be "far," one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Far Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "Far."
First college text I pick up on political ideologies calls Fascism "right wing extremism."


"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


2. Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Far Left.




3. Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always meant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com

So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Far Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.



Then you lied, pretending that the Right demands that women who have abortions be jailed.

Of course, there is no such demand.

You set 'em up, I knock 'em down.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Dude, you gotta stop with the long ass copy and paste rants. Just because you use a lot of words it doesn't make you right, it just makes you obnoxious. If you aren't smart enough to make a concise point then that is something you should really work on. Let me try and squash this nonsense with a very simple question. Please just give a "yes or no" answer. You can rant about it after I respond to your answer.

Would you consider it "Radical" if somebody promoted slavery and taking away womens right to vote?

You know what... forget about my last question. I got sucked into the vortex of stupidity that your hot air has been blowing towards. Here's the deal, try and follow.

When you have two opposing ideologies where one side is "Pro" and the other side is "against" when it comes to a variety of issues, it creates a spectrum. In this case we are calling it the "Right wing" and the "Left wing" If somebody subscribes or agrees with everything that the left believes then they are far left, same goes for those that believe everything on the "Right" Those who agree with some issues from one side and some from the other are moderates. Thats how it works. There is a Far Right and a Far Left. You can't debate that it is fact. End of story.

Now if you want to start talking about "Radicals" which address the degree that some people take their beliefs, we can talk about that, but it is a different discussion, one I don't think i have the patients to have with you today. It is way too nice outside...

There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

If you have used the fallacy "Far Right," see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.


Still can't come up with any conservative positions 'far' from the center of traditional American beliefs and values?


Radical positions as opposed to traditional ones identify "Far" Left



1. ... traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage.. Which one is radical?





2. Another of those positions under regular discussion is 'prayer' in the public arena....Congress opens each year with prayer. Opposing prayer is radical....religiosity is traditional in America.



3. Is 'free speech' embraced by one side, and opposed by the other? You betcha! Obama's Supreme Court nominee says it would be be proper to suppress speech because it is offensive to society or to the government.

Starting to see a pattern?




4. While we were founded on the biblical idea that all men are created equal,

LBJ advanced a two-class nation based on skin color.
....this radical view was advanced: affirmative action. Hence, Democrats....the Far Left.


5. Here's one more radical position by the Left....fighting to elect a sexual pervert and admitted liar and disbarred lawyer to the White House: Bill Clinton
Relative to American traditions, values, and history ...championing a man of such low character is a radical position.
Hence, Far Left..



6. Franklin Roosevelt threw the United States Constitution under the bus, and used the public fisc for all sorts of endeavors not authorized in Article 1, section 8.

A radical and Progressive position.

He was the ultimate "Far Leftist."



7. Under Franklin Roosevlet the federal government was transformed from one of limited & enumerated powers only to the Frankensteinian monster it is today. ....the regulatory welfare state where the federal government regulates business and commerce, natural resources, human resources, ...
Under the Progressives, the federal government was no longer limited by the enumerated powers delegated in the Constitution; ...

Radical to the utmost....hence Far Left.




There is no Far Right....only a Far Left in this country.

....see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

Before you show off your lack of critical thinking skills with another copy and paste response how about you actually read my posts. I just disproved everything that you are saying. Deflecting back to your old bloated stale arguments doesn't change things. You're done. I'm not reading your long ass BS rants anymore, if you want engagement keep it concise and on subject... Stop wasting my time.

Although I have provided numerous examples of Far Left aims, you have been unable to step up to this simple challenge:
see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.



You can't because there is no Far Right.

You've served your purpose.....dismissed.

 

[regent]

How about a college text on political ideologies that says: Right wing extremism is gaining in popularity in the United States...

 

[PoliticalChic]

How about a college text on political ideologies that says: Right wing extremism is gaining in popularity in the United States...

There is no 'Right wing extremism.'

As is always important when dealing with Leftists, Liberals.....let's define terms.


The term 'extreme right wing' and 'extreme left wing' are relative to some understood center.

To be "extreme" one's positions must be radical relative to that center.
American traditions, values, and history represent that center.


The premise here is that, if I can show that the values called 'Extreme Right' are actually at the center of American traditions, values, and history represent that center, well then, they cannot be correctly awarded the modifier "extreme."



"Radical" is important to the discussion. It means "especially of change or action relating to or affecting the fundamental nature of something; far-reaching or thorough" (see Google.)

There are so very many ways to prove same.....


Let's take as an example, traditional marriage, that involves one man and one woman, and compare that with homosexual marriage..
....which is the radical position?
Hence, Leftist extremism.




Need convincing? Well, a common social reference is 'the nuclear family.' It has always menant:
" a family group that consists only of father, mother, and children" Definition of NUCLEAR FAMILY


How about 'traditional family'?
"A traditional family is a family structure that consists of a man, woman and one or more of their biological or adopted children. In most traditional families, the man and woman are husband and wife." Traditional Family: Definition & Concept | Study.com




So....as far as the concept of marriage and family, where do we find the radical position?
The Left.
Hence, 'Extreme Left.'
So far, far from the center, that they cannot point to a single philosopher, sage, or religious leader throughout history who has endorsed homosexual marriage.




If you have used the fallacy "'Right wing extremism" or never considered its usage, see if you can come up with any radical positions by conservatives, the right wing.

 

[danielpalos]

Did y'all on the right wing know, that our federal Constitution and supreme law of the land, was Intelligently Designed to be Both, gender and race neutral, from Inception?