Jaw-Dropping Liberalism

I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.



They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.

It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?


David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.
 
What would you consider a reliable source for information and definitions?
If it had one you could have used it. But maybe you edited it a few minutes ago?
Pick one, let me know a source that you find reliable for definitions and accurate historical information...
I don't work for retards. You make a claim you need to back it up, not somebody else. If there was a reliable source you could use it instead of a open sourced joke of a website.

Meanwhile I will use the English dictionary and the definition of liberal is not anything like liberals, they lie even about themselves.
Here... From dictionary.com We were talking about Fascism being right wing btw, not "liberal". Here is a good breakdown of why:

fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]

A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to theend of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascistgovernments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses amagnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers bymass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion orhatred of both foreigners and “impure” people within his own nation, suchas the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are formsof totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the meansof production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economicequality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of governmentwith a single charismatic leader (the “ cult of personality”), which is thecornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing.
 
I don't think PoliticalChic understands what Liberalism means
We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.



They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.

It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?


David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
 
Sorry to burst your bubble but Liberalism is what created western civilization. It's why the conservative "Radical extremists" want to destroy it.
You poor brianwashed dupe. Post-modern liberals oppose everything the US stood for. Socialism is not what made us great, capitalism is. Guns are how we became a nation and libs want to take them away. That's two examples that prove you're way wrong.
I'm liberal own 10 guns, don't have a problem with certain control measures, don't see any serious democratic leader trying to take guns away. That's NRA BS you're being brainwashed by
They get spanked whenever they try.
When have they tried? That is a false narrative you've been brainwashed into believing
They've done it here in this state dumbfuck. All transfers must be registered by the state. There's nothing constitutional about it. Many states won't allow carrying. States impose magazine limits, etc. All efforts by liberals to chew down our rights. Thanks for proving you're an idiot.
Thats not taking guns away. You fight a strawman. Registration and background checks are forms of control so that crazy or violent people don't get guns. If you want to stand up for the rights of criminals and mental patients to carry then thats your choice but it doesn't make sense to me.
 
LOL. Wikipedia!
What would you consider a reliable source for information and definitions?
If it had one you could have used it. But maybe you edited it a few minutes ago?
Pick one, let me know a source that you find reliable for definitions and accurate historical information...
I don't work for retards. You make a claim you need to back it up, not somebody else. If there was a reliable source you could use it instead of a open sourced joke of a website.

Meanwhile I will use the English dictionary and the definition of liberal is not anything like liberals, they lie even about themselves.
Here... From dictionary.com We were talking about Fascism being right wing btw, not "liberal". Here is a good breakdown of why:

fascism [( fash -iz-uhm)]

A system of government that flourished in Europe from the 1920s to theend of World War II. Germany under Adolf Hitler, Italy under Mussolini, and Spain under Franco were all fascist states. As a rule, fascistgovernments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses amagnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers bymass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion orhatred of both foreigners and “impure” people within his own nation, suchas the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are formsof totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the meansof production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economicequality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of governmentwith a single charismatic leader (the “ cult of personality”), which is thecornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing.


1. "American progressives, for the most part, did not disavow fascism until the horrors of the Nazi Holocaust became manifest during World War II. After the war, those progressives who had praised Mussolini and Hitler in the 1920s and 1930s had no choice but to dissociate themselves from fascism.
“Accordingly,” writes Jonah Goldberg, “leftist intellectuals redefined fascism as 'right-wing' and projected their own sins onto conservatives, even as they continued to borrow heavily from fascist and pre-fascist thought.” This progressive campaign to recast fascism as the "right-wing" antithesis of communism was aided by Joseph Stalin,..."
Progressive Support for Italian and German Fascism - Discover the Networks
Goldberg, Liberal Fascism


2. Now...take the Holocaust as an example....although one American President , FDR, actually authorized concentration camps for his citizens, and while Nazis, Fascists, and Communists were once one big, comfortable association with American Progressives and that very same President, the catalogue of Nazi crimes caused American Progressives to suddenly claim that....no, Nazis and Fascists were not really of the Left...they had to be the very opposite.
 
You obviously don't click links... Do you just have a log of "copy and paste" phrases that you work off of. How about you read, comprehend, think then respond with your own thoughts. Here is the definition of Fascism

Fascism /ˈfæʃɪzəm/ is a form of radical authoritarian nationalism,[1][2] characterized by dictatorial power, forcible suppression of opposition, and control of industry and commerce,[3] that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. The first fascist movements emerged in Italy during World War I, before it spread to other European countries. Opposed to liberalism, Marxism, and anarchism, fascism is usually placed on the far-right within the traditional left–right spectrum.[4][5]
You guys never own anything
What am I supposed to own?
Fascism. You're fking king of it. Own it
I can't own it... I'm not a right winger... I'm not a nationalist... I'm not about authoritarianism

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/
noun
  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
    synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
    • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
see dems don't even know who they really are. Dude, if you're going to step out and demand shit and try and shut us up, then dude you're the fascist. Why are you afraid to own it?

you are in the silence the many category.
I haven't tried to shut anybody up. I engage in discussions not the opposite. I also don't defend either political party, they are both corrupt as shit.
 
You poor brianwashed dupe. Post-modern liberals oppose everything the US stood for. Socialism is not what made us great, capitalism is. Guns are how we became a nation and libs want to take them away. That's two examples that prove you're way wrong.
I'm liberal own 10 guns, don't have a problem with certain control measures, don't see any serious democratic leader trying to take guns away. That's NRA BS you're being brainwashed by
They get spanked whenever they try.
When have they tried? That is a false narrative you've been brainwashed into believing
They've done it here in this state dumbfuck. All transfers must be registered by the state. There's nothing constitutional about it. Many states won't allow carrying. States impose magazine limits, etc. All efforts by liberals to chew down our rights. Thanks for proving you're an idiot.
Thats not taking guns away. You fight a strawman. Registration and background checks are forms of control so that crazy or violent people don't get guns. If you want to stand up for the rights of criminals and mental patients to carry then thats your choice but it doesn't make sense to me.


519j5qf6AqL._SX331_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




Bet you haven't read it.


Have you read any books that don't require crayons?
 
We all understand WHAT MODERN LIBERALISIM IS, we also know what the word means. MODERN LIBERALISIM is a destructive attempt to force people to adhere to a complete acceptance of aberrant behavior as normal by intimidation, extortion and to control all facets of everyone's life.



They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.

It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?


David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.
 
You guys never own anything
What am I supposed to own?
Fascism. You're fking king of it. Own it
I can't own it... I'm not a right winger... I'm not a nationalist... I'm not about authoritarianism

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/
noun
  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
    synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
    • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
see dems don't even know who they really are. Dude, if you're going to step out and demand shit and try and shut us up, then dude you're the fascist. Why are you afraid to own it?

you are in the silence the many category.
I haven't tried to shut anybody up. I engage in discussions not the opposite. I also don't defend either political party, they are both corrupt as shit.
so you're just anti-trump?
 
They need to destroy tradition, religion and liberty.

It can be summed up here:
"We must rid ourselves once and for all of the Quaker-Papist babble about the sanctity of human life."
Leon Trotsky
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?


David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
 
What am I supposed to own?
Fascism. You're fking king of it. Own it
I can't own it... I'm not a right winger... I'm not a nationalist... I'm not about authoritarianism

fas·cism
ˈfaSHˌizəm/
noun
  1. an authoritarian and nationalistic right-wing system of government and social organization.
    synonyms: authoritarianism, totalitarianism, dictatorship, despotism, autocracy; More
    • (in general use) extreme right-wing, authoritarian, or intolerant views or practice.
see dems don't even know who they really are. Dude, if you're going to step out and demand shit and try and shut us up, then dude you're the fascist. Why are you afraid to own it?

you are in the silence the many category.
I haven't tried to shut anybody up. I engage in discussions not the opposite. I also don't defend either political party, they are both corrupt as shit.
so you're just anti-trump?
No, I hope he does well, he is our president. I like some of his ideas and I don't others. The thing that bothers me most is his temperament. His childlike antics are an embarrassment. He lies non-stop, I don't like that. In the end, history will judge him for how he progresses our country and I hope he does a good job. I am nervous though.
 
Shall I start quoting David Duke and using that as an example of how fucked up conservatives are?? You really don't understand the intellectual dishonesty youre bringing with your arguments do you?


David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.
 
David Duke....Democrat.

State Senator, 1975 (Baton Rouge Area)[edit]
Threshold > 50%

First Ballot, November 1, 1975

Louisiana State Senate, 1975
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Kenneth Osterberger 22,287 66
Democratic David Duke 11,079 33
N/A Others 1
Total 100
State Senator, 10th District, 1979 (Suburban New Orleans)[edit]
Threshold > 50% First Ballot, October 27, 1979

Louisiana State Senate, 10th District, 1979
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Joseph Tiemann 21,329 57
Democratic David Duke 9,897 26
N/A Others 6,459 17
Total 37,685 100
Democratic Nomination for United States Presidential Candidate, 1988 (Louisiana results)[edit]
Threshold = Plurality

1988 Democratic Presidential primary in Louisiana
Party Candidate Votes %
Democratic Jesse Jackson 221,522 35
Democratic Al Gore 174,971 28
Democratic Michael Dukakis 95,661 15
Democratic Dick Gephardt 67,029 11
Democratic Gary Hart 26,437 4
Democratic David Duke 23,391 4
Democratic Others 16,008 3
Total 625,019 100
Electoral history of David Duke - Wikipedia
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.


Stop tap-dancing.

I can prove that there is no Far Right.

Seems to me you recognize that I can.
 
I'm not talking about political party. He was also part of the Republican party. We are talking about Right vs Left and his KKK supporting white nationalism views represent the "FAR RIGHT" which is alive and well in this country.


1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.


Stop tap-dancing.

I can prove that there is no Far Right.

Seems to me you recognize that I can.
Im not surprised that you believe that... I"m sure you have a copy and paste argument that "proves" that up is down and 2+2=5
 
1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.


Stop tap-dancing.

I can prove that there is no Far Right.

Seems to me you recognize that I can.
Im not surprised that you believe that... I"m sure you have a copy and paste argument that "proves" that up is down and 2+2=5
well actually, 2+2=5 is a liberal saying. It was actually stated by them as fact. no shit.
 
1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.


Stop tap-dancing.

I can prove that there is no Far Right.

Seems to me you recognize that I can.
Im not surprised that you believe that... I"m sure you have a copy and paste argument that "proves" that up is down and 2+2=5



You'll never know, will you, you dolt?
 
1. David Duke was born and raised a Democrat.
And....the KKK was created for and by the Democrats.
Liberal historian Eric Foner writes that the Klan was “…a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party…” Foner, “Reconstruction: America’s Unfinished Revolution, 1863-1877,” p. 425


2. Franklin Roosevelt, Democrat, made his first Supreme Court selection a KKKer, Hugo Black.
"... Black was head of new members for the largest Klan cell in the South. New members of the KKK had to pledge their allegiance to the “eternal separation of Church and State.”... Separation was a crucial part of the KKK’s jurisprudential agenda. It was included in the Klansman’s Creed..."
Egnorance: Hugo Black and the real history of "the wall of separation between church and state"

3. The personification of the Democrat Party, Bill Clinton, has always been a racist.
Challenge me on this?


4.Oh....and challenge me to prove that there is no 'Far Right.'


Waiting.
All you do is proof there IS a far right... You display it with your posts. It is a silly argument anyways. When you have a spectrum there HAS to be "far" or extreme followers on each end, just as there has to be moderates that take the positions of both sides.


There is no Far Right....only a Far Left.

Sooo....you don't want to challenge me to prove it?

So sorry, you're missing a supreme intellectual exposition.
I already proved you wrong... On a spectrum you have the ends and the middle. You can't prove that there is no end.


Stop tap-dancing.

I can prove that there is no Far Right.

Seems to me you recognize that I can.
Im not surprised that you believe that... I"m sure you have a copy and paste argument that "proves" that up is down and 2+2=5


And.....are you attempting to use 'cut and paste' as a pejorative (you better look that up)?


Here's what Cornell says about that:
1. What has been pejoratively referred to as ‘simply cut and paste,’ is, in fact, carefully chosen to substantiate a point. Is the information covered fact, opinion, or propaganda? Facts can usually be verified; opinions, though they may be based on factual information, evolve from the interpretation of facts.(LibGuides: Critically Analyzing Information Sources: Critical Appraisal and Analysis)


And this on writing research papers:
2. What has been called ‘cut and paste’ is frequently the message board version of footnotes and endnotes of an academic essay. “…footnotes were declared outmoded just before the era of the word-processors which make using footnotes so much easier. Still, because of its relative ease in both writing and reading, parenthetical documentation is greatly preferred by most instructors.” http://www.ccc.commnet.edu/mla/practical_guide.shtml
websites.wnc.edu/~kille/Fred/researchpaper.rtf


You may learn that when you get to college.
 
You poor brianwashed dupe. Post-modern liberals oppose everything the US stood for. Socialism is not what made us great, capitalism is. Guns are how we became a nation and libs want to take them away. That's two examples that prove you're way wrong.
I'm liberal own 10 guns, don't have a problem with certain control measures, don't see any serious democratic leader trying to take guns away. That's NRA BS you're being brainwashed by
They get spanked whenever they try.
When have they tried? That is a false narrative you've been brainwashed into believing
They've done it here in this state dumbfuck. All transfers must be registered by the state. There's nothing constitutional about it. Many states won't allow carrying. States impose magazine limits, etc. All efforts by liberals to chew down our rights. Thanks for proving you're an idiot.
Thats not taking guns away. You fight a strawman. Registration and background checks are forms of control so that crazy or violent people don't get guns. If you want to stand up for the rights of criminals and mental patients to carry then thats your choice but it doesn't make sense to me.
...except we've seen how it works everywhere else so I have to reject your spin for what it is.
 

Forum List

Back
Top