JFK wouldn't be a Democrap today

...and the mentally insane shows up.

So I don't recall the GOP running on national socialist healthcare, euthanasia, public takeover of private business and the collective community...like the Nazis and Democraps.

Hitler would be a republican
 
No, Ted Kennedy was a fat, drunk asshole killer that lived off JFK's name.

He was more radical than his brothers because that is how he stayed in office so long until the booze killed him.

Party's not liberal enough for him today?

I think Zell Miller would have a good answer for you, GB, he was a Kennedy democrat.
Of course, you wouldn't understand it. :eusa_eh:

Ted Kennedy was a Kennedy Democrat.

Zell was more of a Dixiecrat.
 
Party's not liberal enough for him today?

I think Zell Miller would have a good answer for you, GB, he was a Kennedy democrat.
Of course, you wouldn't understand it. :eusa_eh:

Ted Kennedy was a Kennedy Democrat.

Zell was more of a Dixiecrat.

No, JFK was not a Teddy democrat....get real.
I think Bobby and Jack were the Kennedy democrats....but not Theo.
Having said that.....the democrats in the 60's were not the democrats of today.
 
Meister, you have it incorrect, I think. John, Robert, and Ted were very much democrats of the 1950s and 1960s. The major difference, of course, is that Ted survived his brothers by almost fifty years, but the early training was there.

You libers and ultra rights really do need to use the accepted terminology and definitions of historical and political America.
 
Meister, you have it incorrect, I think. John, Robert, and Ted were very much democrats of the 1950s and 1960s. The major difference, of course, is that Ted survived his brothers by almost fifty years, but the early training was there.

You libers and ultra rights really do need to use the accepted terminology and definitions of historical and political America.

Yeah right, Jake....now get back to your sandbox.
 
You're an idiot Democrap "fan" that is trying to connect yourself to JFK's heroic status in American culture just like his fat little brother Teddy did riding his brothers' coattails into politics.

Teddy got in the club with his last name but then soon learned he needed to go insane radical to have the DNC keep supporting him because his older brothers were dead and he couldn't live off that for long.

Idiots like you eat it all up, even buy bogus books convincing you JFK is just like you....a nut.

No, Ted Kennedy was a fat, drunk asshole killer that lived off JFK's name.

We've seen how familiar you are with JFK and the New Frontier. Open a book from time to time.
 
Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:
 
Having said that.....the democrats in the 60's were not the democrats of today.

No kidding. The Kennedys and the Democrats of the 1960s based their entire policy agenda on the words of FDR:

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.
 
Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:

tax cuts
ramping up the military for Nam
deficit spending under control
a uniter not a divider

oh yeah...here's a biggie, "Ask not what your country can do for you,
ask what you can do for your country."

Sure doesn't sound anything close to what a democrat is about today, sound more like what Miller was used to as a democrat.
 
JaketheFake is a liberal troll that comes here to stir up trouble, that's it.

Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:

tax cuts
ramping up the military for Nam
deficit spending under control
a uniter not a divider

oh yeah...here's a biggie, "Ask not what your country can do for you,
ask what you can do for your country."

Sure doesn't sound anything close to what a democrat is about today, sound more like what Miller was used to as a democrat.
 
Having said that.....the democrats in the 60's were not the democrats of today.

No kidding. The Kennedys and the Democrats of the 1960s based their entire policy agenda on the words of FDR:

In our day these economic truths have become accepted as self-evident. We have accepted, so to speak, a second Bill of Rights under which a new basis of security and prosperity can be established for all—regardless of station, race, or creed.

Among these are:
The right to a useful and remunerative job in the industries or shops or farms or mines of the nation;
The right to earn enough to provide adequate food and clothing and recreation;
The right of every farmer to raise and sell his products at a return which will give him and his family a decent living;
The right of every businessman, large and small, to trade in an atmosphere of freedom from unfair competition and domination by monopolies at home or abroad;
The right of every family to a decent home;
The right to adequate medical care and the opportunity to achieve and enjoy good health;
The right to adequate protection from the economic fears of old age, sickness, accident, and unemployment;
The right to a good education.
All of these rights spell security. And after this war is won we must be prepared to move forward, in the implementation of these rights, to new goals of human happiness and well-being.

You even read what you posted?????
"The right to...."
Not the "You will be granted....."

See the difference, GB?
 
JFK cut taxes to stimulate the economy.....liberals ignore that FACT.

JFK cut taxes because we were entering a surplus. Douchebags ignore that FACT.

JFK investigated MLK Jr for his activities and would never support Jackson/Sharpton today......liberals ignore that FACT.

J Edgar Hoover was the one investigating MLK Jr. He also blackmailed leaders. You're a stupid fuck.

JFK got us tangled in a bad war in Vietnam (worse than Bush's Iraq)......liberals ignore that FACT.

It was Ike who chose not to abide by the Paris Treaty, and allow free elections in Vietnam that was the prime cause of the Vietnam Civil War. You're really one stupid fuck.

JFK would not belong to the socialist, anti-military Democrap party of today....that is a FACT.

JFK would be among the first to say you like sucking sucking your own asshole.
 
Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:

tax cuts
ramping up the military for Nam
deficit spending under control
a uniter not a divider

oh yeah...here's a biggie, "Ask not what your country can do for you,
ask what you can do for your country."

Sure doesn't sound anything close to what a democrat is about today, sound more like what Miller was used to as a democrat.

Bush I, Bush II, and Reagan were Democrats?
 
Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:

I understand that you lick your fist after you amuse yourself.
 
JFK cut taxes to stimulate the economy.....liberals ignore that FACT.

JFK cut taxes because we were entering a surplus. Douchebags ignore that FACT.

JFK investigated MLK Jr for his activities and would never support Jackson/Sharpton today......liberals ignore that FACT.

J Edgar Hoover was the one investigating MLK Jr. He also blackmailed leaders. You're a stupid fuck.

JFK got us tangled in a bad war in Vietnam (worse than Bush's Iraq)......liberals ignore that FACT.

It was Ike who chose not to abide by the Paris Treaty, and allow free elections in Vietnam that was the prime cause of the Vietnam Civil War. You're really one stupid fuck.

JFK would not belong to the socialist, anti-military Democrap party of today....that is a FACT.

JFK would be among the first to say you like sucking sucking your own asshole.

Today's liberals wouldn't reduce the tax rate, they would just ramp up more spending, DT.
 
Watching the libertards and the ultra rights attempting, so ineffectively, to revise American history and politics amuses me. See, you guys have some role to play here: as clowns. :lol:

tax cuts
ramping up the military for Nam
deficit spending under control
a uniter not a divider

oh yeah...here's a biggie, "Ask not what your country can do for you,
ask what you can do for your country."

Sure doesn't sound anything close to what a democrat is about today, sound more like what Miller was used to as a democrat.

Bush I, Bush II, and Reagan were Democrats?
Good thought, make a thread on it, but the topic is about JFK, if I'm not mistaken. Try and stay on topic, DT.
 

Forum List

Back
Top