Lastamender
Diamond Member
- Dec 28, 2011
- 61,908
- 55,518
It is painfully evident the FBI and Federal government were behind Jan. 6th to cover up the fraud. They are guilty of treason and murder.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Where is the rest of the text convo?If this was the only text discussing this, that’d be one thing. But it isn’t.
There’s a lot of information about Trump’s plan.
For example, see the Eastman memo which talks about the same thing.
These are the facts being uncovered by the Jan 6th committee and the reason that people like Meadows aren’t cooperating. They dont want the conspiracy to see the light of day.
The rest of the convo went very pro-unconstitutional.Where is the rest of the text convo?
The Eastland memo? really? a perfectly legal memo by a lawyer to challenge the election. Are people that lose an election not allowed to have lawyers draw up plans to challenge elections now? what about it. specifically is at issue?
1) where are the text?The rest of the convo went very pro-unconstitutional.
![]()
Mark Meadows texted a member of Congress, 'I love it,' about a plan to submit 'alternate' slates of Trump electors, January 6 committee says
The committee has already secured key records related to January 6 but is set to vote on holding Meadows in contempt for not going to a deposition.www.businessinsider.com
Describing the Eastman memo as a plan to challenge the election is like saying a bank robbery is a plan to challenge bank withdrawals. It’s illegal. It’s an illegal means to overthrow the constitutional means of electing presidents.
You guys really need to wake up and realize how bad this was.
The illegal action was again the same as what Jordan suggested.1) where are the text?
2) what was illegal in the memo? be specific?
If you are asking, then see how right I was about being stupid?so you can’t answer my question?
Funny how he said he had nothing to hide and now he's hiding.sentene? Jordan isn't charged with anything, and the Committee isn't a Court...geez...on what planet are you living? Just how brainwashed are you cultist?
It wasn't doctored. Schiff was cleared on that because the text said the same thing. Obviously you can't read either.of course we all was the real text after the committee published the one they doctored
so?
"painfully evident"It is painfully evident the FBI and Federal government were behind Jan. 6th to cover up the fraud. They are guilty of treason and murder.
He was part of the coup. It's really a slam dunk case against Jordan. We have the forensic evidence.Funny how he said he had nothing to hide and now he's hiding.
When one entertains another ones stupidity, what does that make the one?i am asking a question…you are the one that suppose to produce the answer.
do you not have one?
Jim Jordan Responds to January 6 Committee Meeting Request, Rejects Legitimacy of Investigation
9 Jan 2022 ~~ By Ashley Oliver![]()
Jordan Responds to Jan. 6 Committee Request, Rejects Legitimacy of Investigation
Rep. Jim Jordan denounced the January 6 committee's request to meet with him as being “outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry.”www.breitbart.com
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) formally replied on Sunday to the January 6 select committee’s request to meet with him as part of its investigation, denouncing the request as “outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry.”
Jordan gave his reply in a letter obtained by Breitbart News and addressed to committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) after weeks of reviewing the committee’s request, which was made December 22.
“This request is far outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry, violates core Constitutional principles, and would serve to further erode legislative norms,” Jordan wrote.
Read a copy of the letter below:
PDF Download.:
~Snip~
Perry, for his part, outright rejected the committee’s request on December 21, immediately after the committee contacted him.
Thompson indicated a week ago during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press that he is exploring whether the committee can legally subpoena sitting members of Congress. “I think there are some questions of whether we have the authority to do it,” Thompson said. “We’re looking at it. If the authorities are there, there’ll be no reluctance on our part.”
Breitbart News has reached out to Thompson’s office for comment on if and how he plans to respond to Jordan’s response to the committee.
Commentary:
It has already been established that Adam Schiff has been caught for the second time manufacturing and tampering with evidence. This time for the Jan 6th Witch Hunt.
Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan Jan. 6 Evidence in Meadows Hearing?
Thusly the 'Select Committee' Investigating was illegitimate to begin with and Schiff has made it doubly so.
Meanwhile, why hasn't the 'Select Committee' asked or subpoenaed Clair Zoe Lofgren, Pelosi, or any other Democrat Congress person?
Why hasn't the FBI released the 15,000 hours of video.
Asking more stupid questions I see.1) where are the text?
2) what was illegal in the memo? be specific?
Right, the Republicans who are being investigated are either not cooperating or pleading the Fifth. So much for a "Kangaroo Investigation."It is a Kangaroo investigation. All done by Democrats with only two Republican Trump haters mixed in and absolutely no one to defend Trump, and the results are going to be released just before the midterms. Imagine that.
Jim Jordan Responds to January 6 Committee Meeting Request, Rejects Legitimacy of Investigation
9 Jan 2022 ~~ By Ashley Oliver![]()
Jordan Responds to Jan. 6 Committee Request, Rejects Legitimacy of Investigation
Rep. Jim Jordan denounced the January 6 committee's request to meet with him as being “outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry.”www.breitbart.com
Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) formally replied on Sunday to the January 6 select committee’s request to meet with him as part of its investigation, denouncing the request as “outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry.”
Jordan gave his reply in a letter obtained by Breitbart News and addressed to committee chair Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-MS) after weeks of reviewing the committee’s request, which was made December 22.
“This request is far outside the bounds of any legitimate inquiry, violates core Constitutional principles, and would serve to further erode legislative norms,” Jordan wrote.
Read a copy of the letter below:
PDF Download.:
~Snip~
Perry, for his part, outright rejected the committee’s request on December 21, immediately after the committee contacted him.
Thompson indicated a week ago during an appearance on NBC’s Meet the Press that he is exploring whether the committee can legally subpoena sitting members of Congress. “I think there are some questions of whether we have the authority to do it,” Thompson said. “We’re looking at it. If the authorities are there, there’ll be no reluctance on our part.”
Breitbart News has reached out to Thompson’s office for comment on if and how he plans to respond to Jordan’s response to the committee.
Commentary:
It has already been established that Adam Schiff has been caught for the second time manufacturing and tampering with evidence. This time for the Jan 6th Witch Hunt.
Fact Check: Did Adam Schiff 'Tamper' With Jim Jordan Jan. 6 Evidence in Meadows Hearing?
Thusly the 'Select Committee' Investigating was illegitimate to begin with and Schiff has made it doubly so.
Meanwhile, why hasn't the 'Select Committee' asked or subpoenaed Clair Zoe Lofgren, Pelosi, or any other Democrat Congress person?
Why hasn't the FBI released the 15,000 hours of video.
You are a pathological liar, who never produces evidence for anything. You are dismissed.It is painfully evident the FBI and Federal government were behind Jan. 6th to cover up the fraud. They are guilty of treason and murder.
The attack itself was the result of a failed coup.haha where is the conspiracy?
you have one text, one congressmen, telling Meadows his opinion on what can happen.
What was Meadows response? where is the conspiracy?
The party doing the investigation always gets the results it wants. Just look at the Russian collusion witchhunt and both bogus impeachments. You can also look at the make believe investigations against Comey, Strzok, Page, Brennen, Mueller, Weinstein, McCabe, Rosenstein and the rest of the FBI-CIA-DOJ treasonists. Investigations these days seem to be either witchhunts or coverups. They're better off being disregarded