Jobs report is not good: it may be as low as 140,000 although

[LordBrownTrout]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

Lol, and you think this is some new revelation that the economy and jobs are horrid? There is no bill that will create jobs. Thats total absurdity.

Your statement is an absurdity.

Yeah sure. Lol.

 

[BluesLegend]

Unemployment rate down in a much larger population with a lot of retirees each month.

Employment is not based on general population Jake.

Explain that to the goobers who are trying to include the unemployable in the numbers.

good one idiot; explain to all of us, goober, why the number of EMPLOYABLE, that is WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED Americans not participating in the Labor Market has gone up so much under obama

oh I know this one, Obama is a freaking retard leftist?

 

[bedowin62]

Bureau of Labor Statistics | Jobenomics
jobenomicsblog.com/tag/bureau-of-labor-statistics/

• Cached
• Similar

Jul 29, 2015 - An able-bodied adult who is capable of working but chooses not to work should ... mix as a percentage of the civilian labor force, the U6 rate would rise to 70%, ... million, for a net loss of 3.8 million employed workers—not good news. .... Since the beginning of the Obama Administration, net workforce losses

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Unemployment rate down in a much larger population with a lot of retirees each month.

Employment is not based on general population Jake.

Jake loves regurgitated goo. He really believes it when the media tells him there are millions retiring every day and the main driver of all the unemployed are retirees. Ignorance must really blissful.

 

[pinqy]

demograpics; a higher number of WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS arent working under this President..

Numbers? Sure. What about percentages, though?

So the percent of able-bodied working age men has gone up under Obama (75.7% to 78.2%) while the percent of able-bodied working age women has gone slightly down (66.9% to 55.5%)

So it doesn't look like you've made your point.

 

[bedowin62]

demograpics; a higher number of WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS arent working under this President..

Numbers? Sure. What about percentages, though?

So the percent of able-bodied working age men has gone up under Obama (75.7% to 78.2%) while the percent of able-bodied working age women has gone slightly down (66.9% to 55.5%)

So it doesn't look like you've made your point.

um yes i have made my point because the number of workers overall that are able-bodied but not participating in the labor market has gone up under obama

 

[bedowin62]

The latest BLS Employment Situation Summary[1] reports that over the last month (June 2015) 223,000 Americans entered the U.S. labor force, 640,000 able-bodied Americans quit looking for work and voluntarily departed the labor force (often to some form of public or familial welfare or assistance), for a net workforce loss of 417,000 Americans. The official number of unemployed (i.e., those who continue to look for work) dropped by 375,000, while positive, it did not compensate for the 417,000 people who quit looking for work and joined the Not-in-Labor-Force cadre. Labor force statistics are also shown above covering the last quarter (Q2: April, May, June 2015), the last year, the period since 2010 (the Jobenomics starting point), the start of the Obama Administration in 2009, and the beginning of the 21st Century (year 2000). Since the year 2000, the U.S. labor force lost a net of 13,907,000 workers with 2,646,000 more Americans unemployed today than 15 years earlier. While recent employment and unemployment have shown positive results, these results are more than offset by the number of people departing the U.S. labor force. Over the same period, the U.S. population grew by 39 million people, which places greater financial burdens on employed Americans. - See more at: Bureau of Labor Statistics | Jobenomics

 

[pinqy]

demograpics; a higher number of WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS arent working under this President..

Numbers? Sure. What about percentages, though?

So the percent of able-bodied working age men has gone up under Obama (75.7% to 78.2%) while the percent of able-bodied working age women has gone slightly down (66.9% to 55.5%)

So it doesn't look like you've made your point.

um yes i have made my point because the number of workers overall that are able-bodied but not participating in the labor market has gone up under obama

And the number of workers overall that are able-bodied and participating in the labor force has ALSO gone up. And by more.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Unemployment rate down in a much larger population with a lot of retirees each month.

Employment is not based on general population Jake.

Jake loves regurgitated goo. He really believes it when the media tells him there are millions retiring every day and the main driver of all the unemployed are retirees. Ignorance must really blissful.

Your statement reveals that you substitute your uninformed opinion for verifiable facts. OK.

 

[JakeStarkey]

demograpics; a higher number of WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS arent working under this President..

Numbers? Sure. What about percentages, though?

So the percent of able-bodied working age men has gone up under Obama (75.7% to 78.2%) while the percent of able-bodied working age women has gone slightly down (66.9% to 55.5%)

So it doesn't look like you've made your point.

um yes i have made my point because the number of workers overall that are able-bodied but not participating in the labor market has gone up under obama

And the number of workers overall that are able-bodied and participating in the labor force has ALSO gone up. And by more.

See, the far right have trouble with facts and numbers and other uncomfortable information.

 

[bedowin62]

As shown above, shortly after the Great Recession, the U3 rate reached its peak at 10% in October 2009. Since then, the U3 rate has dropped to 5.3%, which represents 7.1 million less unemployed Americans—seemingly good news. During the same period, 10.9 million citizens voluntarily departed the work force—many to the netherworld of perpetual unemployment and welfare. Consequently, while America decreased its number of unemployed by 7.1 million, it increased the number of its non-working, able-bodied, adults by 10.9 million, for a net loss of 3.8 million employed workers—not good news. From an overall labor force perspective, the U3 rate is a relatively poor indicator and undeserving of the amount of attention it receives. - See more at: Bureau of Labor Statistics | Jobenomics

 

[BluesLegend]

This is what happens when the free press is corrupted by lying lowlife scum liberals. For years this administration has talked out of both sides of its mouth declaring both how great the economy is under Obama while simultaneously claiming the poor and middle class are in dire straights. The press? They have looked the other way and let them lie.

 

[bedowin62]

According to BLS data[8], those in the Not-in-Labor-Force category (those that can work but don’t) has surged consistently since year 2000 by 25.0 million people. Since 2009, the start of the Obama Administration, it grew by 13.2 million. Since 2010, the beginning of the decade, it grew by 9.8 million people. Last 12 months, last quarter and last month Not-in-Labor-Force grew by 1.5 million, 451,000 and 640,000 people, respectively. - See more at: Bureau of Labor Statistics | Jobenomics




do i need to do the math for you left-wingers here?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The economy is improving, and, yes, the poor and the working classes have been denied their fair portion of it. What is new?

 

[bedowin62]

demograpics; a higher number of WORKING-AGE AND ABLE-BODIED AMERICANS arent working under this President..

Numbers? Sure. What about percentages, though?

So the percent of able-bodied working age men has gone up under Obama (75.7% to 78.2%) while the percent of able-bodied working age women has gone slightly down (66.9% to 55.5%)

So it doesn't look like you've made your point.

um yes i have made my point because the number of workers overall that are able-bodied but not participating in the labor market has gone up under obama

And the number of workers overall that are able-bodied and participating in the labor force has ALSO gone up. And by more.

See, the far right have trouble with facts and numbers and other uncomfortable information.

see; i already refuted this WITH FACTS. the overall number of ABLE-BODIED WORKERS NOT PARTICIPATING IN THE LABOR MARKET HAS RISEN UNDER OBAMA

there ARE a few here that cant handle inconveniant facts; but they arent on the Right, leftard.

idiots and hypocrites

 

[bedowin62]

The economy is improving, and, yes, the poor and the working classes have been denied their fair portion of it. What is new?

what about the "change" leftard???????

 

[Dad2three]

Job creation misses big in September

The unemployment rate has been declining steadily, but that has come in significant part due to the lowest labor force participation rate since the late 1970s. The participation rate plunged to 62.4 percent in September.

Retirement Among Baby Boomers Contributing To Shrinking Labor Force. According to The Washington Post, many economists agree the shrinking labor force participation rate is largely explained by a demographic shift, wherein "baby boomers are starting to retire en masse":

Demographics have always played a big role in the rise and fall of the labor force. Between 1960 and 2000, the labor force in the United States surged from 59 percent to a peak of 67.3 percent. That was largely due to the fact that more women were entering the labor force while improvements in health and information technology allowed Americans to work more years.

But since 2000, the labor force rate has been steadily declining as the baby-boom generation has been retiring. Because of this, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago expects the labor force participation rate to be lower in 2020 than it is today, regardless of how well the economy does.

In a March report titled "Dispelling an Urban Legend," Dean Maki, an economist at Barclays Capital, found that demographics accounted for a majority of the drop in the participation rate since 2002.


The incredible shrinking labor force

Gee, so all those articles about people STAYING in their jobs because they don't have enough to retire yet are wrong?

Demographics have always played a big role in the rise and fall of the labor force. Between 1960 and 2000, the labor force in the United States surged from 59 percent to a peak of 67.3 percent. That was largely due to the fact that more women were entering the labor force while improvements in health and information technology allowed Americans to work more years.

But since 2000, the labor force rate has been steadily declining as the baby-boom generation has been retiring. Because of this, the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago expects the labor force participation rate to be lower in 2020 than it is today, regardless of how well the economy does.

In a March report titled "Dispelling an Urban Legend," Dean Maki, an economist at Barclays Capital, found that demographics accounted for a majority of the drop in the participation rate since 2002.


The incredible shrinking labor force

 

[JakeStarkey]

The far right believes it is all a leftist plot.

Ask the what is "what" and they go, "you know", and slink away.

 

[JakeStarkey]

CNN is reporting a different number: "At 8:30 a.m. Eastern, the Labor Department will report its latest figures on hiring and unemployment for September.

After employers added a disappointing 173,000 new jobs last month, analysts are hoping that gains will at least top the 200,000 mark as the economy heads into the final quarter of 2015. The jobless rate is expected to hold at 5.1 percent"

The Dems and the Pubs in the House have to work out a jobs bill the Senate and the Pres can support.

The stone walling by both parties has to end.

Lol, and you think this is some new revelation that the economy and jobs are horrid? There is no bill that will create jobs. Thats total absurdity.

Your statement is an absurdity.

Yeah sure. Lol.

It's good to admit you are beaten.

 

[Dad2three]

This is what happens when the free press is corrupted by lying lowlife scum liberals. For years this administration has talked out of both sides of its mouth declaring both how great the economy is under Obama while simultaneously claiming the poor and middle class are in dire straights. The press? They have looked the other way and let them lie.

We already know what economic policies work best for our country. Clinton knew that we had to cut spending and increase revenues. We had revenues of 20% of GDP and 4 surpluses (3 after BJ Bill vetoed the GOP's $700+ billion tax cuts) Then something terrible happened, the Republicans gained complete control in 2001 and instead of sticking with what was working they decided that their ideology was more important. The debt has gone up $12+ trillion since then.

DUBYA LOST OVER 1+ MILLION JOBS WITH HIS AND THE GOP'S "JOB CREATOR" POLICIES, OBAMA HAS SEEN NEARLY 13 MILLION JOBS CREATED SINCE HITTING BUSH'S BOTTOM MARCH 2010