Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I do not care about the technicalities. Biden took bribes.
One thing they won't do is come clean.How will the deep state respond?
Congress forced Wray to cough up the document and Trump was indicted.
Now they have 17 recordings of bidens taking bribes...what will the DS do? start a nuclear war? Release the marburg virus on the population?
Nothing you've posted indicates that the FBI has the recordings. Or that anyone has confirmed that the recordings actually exist.
Merely that in a form, someone said they do.
Do you have any evidence that the recording themselves actually exist?
How will the deep state respond?
Congress forced Wray to cough up the document and Trump was indicted.
Now they have 17 recordings of bidens taking bribes...what will the DS do? start a nuclear war? Release the marburg virus on the population?
Nope.Good question on the FBI. What Grassley said was the FBI redacted the information about the existence of the tapes.
The FBI has acknowledged the informant is a creditable FBI source for over 10 years.
Alleged. And on a form that I can fill out and turn in myself. Until the recordings are verified and presented in a court of law this is not viable.
Why don't the Feds care? Because it's Alleged, not supported.
You can say anything you want on the congress floor but walk in and do the same thing in a court of law and you had better be right. This is why Rumps Lawyers were arrested, tried and convicted for this nonsense. And even Rudy didn't go into court and spew his crap. Powell didn't either.
No. I am talking about the weasel clauses in our laws. Do you really think Biden is not corrupt? Try to be honest.And by technicalities....you mean actual evidence.
Of course you don't. What you've just demonstrated again, is that you don't use evidence to draw your conclusions. You start with your conclusions, and then scramble for evidence later to back up what you want to believe.
Why would this be any different?
You do know the real job of the FBI is to investigate allegations, specifically those made by credibly sources.
No. I am talking about the weasel clauses in our laws. Do you really think Biden is not corrupt? Try to be honest.
uh, kid,,, there are no tapes. NO TAPES. It is an Orange Goose chase.And the denial continues.
Lets say these tapes are valid,you know damn well you'd say they were doctored.
uh, kid,,, there are no tapes. NO TAPES. It is an Orange Goose chase.
Good ol' Senator Grassley has some dirt on dirty Joe, the kid sniffing walking stick figure.
"Jun 12, 2023
In a shocking revelation, Senator Grassley claims that a foreign national possesses secret audio recordings of him bribing Joe and Hunter Biden. This breaking news sends shockwaves through the political sphere, raising questions about the corruption and illicit dealings involving the Bidens. Where is the DOJ?"
Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, Hunter
Sen. Chuck Grassley said Monday that the Burisma executive who allegedly paid Joe Biden and Hunter Biden kept 17 audio recordings of his conversations with them as an “insurance policy," citing the FBI FD-1023 form that the bureau briefed congressional lawmakers on.www.foxnews.com
Grassley: Burisma executive who allegedly paid Biden has audio recordings of conversations with Joe, Hunter
uh, kid,,, there are no tapes. NO TAPES. It is an Orange Goose chase.
Disagree, bud. They do not exist until they do, and we have no real evidence that they ever existed.We don't know that.
The best we can say at present is that the tapes are alleged to exist in an unsubstantiated 4 year old FD-1023 form backed by no specific evidence that has never been verified.
That's some weak tea. But it doesn't verify that the tapes exist or don't.
"The 1023 produced to that House Committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them," Grassley continued. "17 total recordings."Nope.
"The 1023 produced to that House Committee redacted reference that the foreign national who allegedly bribed Joe and Hunter Biden allegedly has audio recordings of his conversations with them," Grassley continued. "17 total recordings."
"According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses 15 audio recordings of phone calls between him and Hunter Biden," Grassley said. "According to the 1023, the foreign national possesses two audio recordings of phone calls between him and then-Vice President Joe Biden."
The name of the foreign national was redacted. The mention of the existence of recordings were not. Nor does Grassley claim that the were.
The source isn't claiming any direct knowledge. The source is relaying second hand accounts that are unsubstantiated.
The FBI didn't find the claims credible when they arrived in 2020 under Trump. And they still don't find them credible.
Why hasn't Hunter been call to give testimony?
The allegations weren't made by the credible source. The claims were relayed THROUGH the credible source, second hand. The actual accusations appear to be from a Bursima executive.
The FBI didn't find the claims credible in 2020 under Trump. And still don't.
