Johns Hopkins Chief of Psychiatry: Being transgender is a "mental" disorder

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Two ignored posters, Luddly Neddite and PaintMyHouse , by far two of the worst government shills to troll this board, are the only ones that voted against the poll question.

LOL

If intellectual means could be converted into thermo-nuclear energy those two would not provide the energy sufficient to light a match.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Just because you're smart and accomplished doesn't mean you aren't wrong, and he is.

I wonder what sex he thinks XY women and XX men are? Is an X0 woman only half a woman? How about XXXY? Nature, unlike this probably very nice old man, does not suffer from black and white thinking.

This is a perfect example of a person with a mental disorder.

My disorder is I can deal with reality. In America that makes you very unusual.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Just because you're smart and accomplished doesn't mean you aren't wrong, and he is.

I wonder what sex he thinks XY women and XX men are?

XY genes are male and xx genes are female.

There are no XY females and there are no xx males.

And all of the nonsense which claims there are is just that: NONSENSE!

This is another deceitful rant by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality, which not a single fucking word was spoken until the "Shades of ghey"
Cult film was trotted out to help the idiots "Believe" in the existence of 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th gender.

All brought to you by the same cult that brought you Eugenics and more recently GLOBAL COOLING! ... and most recently... GLOBAL WARMING!

They're all damnable lies designed to influence the lowest common denominator.

Woah, why are libbies so anti-science?

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Just because you're smart and accomplished doesn't mean you aren't wrong, and he is.

I wonder what sex he thinks XY women and XX men are?

XY genes are male and xx genes are female.

There are no XY females and there are no xx males.

And all of the nonsense which claims there are is just that: NONSENSE!

This is another deceitful rant by the Advocacy to Normalize Sexual Abnormality, which not a single fucking word was spoken until the "Shades of ghey"
Cult film was trotted out to help the idiots "Believe" in the existence of 3rd, 4th, 5th and 6th gender.

All brought to you by the same cult that brought you Eugenics and more recently GLOBAL COOLING! ... and most recently... GLOBAL WARMING!

They're all damnable lies designed to influence the lowest common denominator.

Woah, why are libbies so anti-science?

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

 

[Silhouette]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

When she posts utter crap she's lucky I bother to respond.

 

[Skylar]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

When she posts utter crap she's lucky I bother to respond.

LOL. You did prove Key's point. And now you're on a repeating loop.

 

[Skylar]

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

When she posts utter crap she's lucky I bother to respond.

LOL. You did prove Key's point. And now you're on a repeating loop.

No, keys merely begged the question. There's nothing to refute if the claim hasn't been factually or logically established.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Science is objective... Relativism rejects objectivity... And the Ideological Left rests entirely in Relativism.

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

 

[Skylar]

Total nonsense...

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Without realizing it (hallmark of your issues to begin with) you just made Keys' point.

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

 

[Skylar]

Nope, nothing of the kind, dumbass.

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Not even intelligent enough to know that denial is not refutation.

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

Repetition doesn't turn a stupid argument smart. I learned that in primary school.

 

[Skylar]

Begging the question isn't factually establishing anything. Thus, what is there to deny?

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

Repetition doesn't turn a stupid argument smart. I learned that in primary school.

Begging the question isn't an argument. Its a statement of unsupported opinion. Thus, what is there to refute?

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Deny? You Leftwats are continually forced to deny you aren't unpatriotic, haters of religion, racist, bigoted, soft on crime, sympathizers of terrorism and criminals, potheads, communist, and of generally low intelligence. Does that help?

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

Repetition doesn't turn a stupid argument smart. I learned that in primary school.

Begging the question isn't an argument. Its a statement of unsupported opinion. Thus, what is there to refute?

I gave you that list. You can add internet scat porn masturbator to the list too. Almost forgot that one.

 

[Skylar]

That's mere name calling. Not a rational argument.

Back to the point of discussion: Keyes has yet to factually establish his claim. He merely stated it without logical or factual basis. Thus, its mere opinion.

And there's no need to refute opinion as its objectively meaningless.

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

Repetition doesn't turn a stupid argument smart. I learned that in primary school.

Begging the question isn't an argument. Its a statement of unsupported opinion. Thus, what is there to refute?

I gave you that list. You can add internet scat porn masturbator to the list too. Almost forgot that one.

Red herring. The only list you're demonstrating now is logical fallacies.

Is there anything else? If red herrings are the extent of your argument, you're done.

 

[saintmichaeldefendthem]

Yet Paintsniffer confirmed it in his response.

Nope. He merely expressed an opinion in response to an opinion.

Again, begging the question doesn't factually or logically establish a thing. Thus, there's nothing to refute. This is basic logic. Like 3rd week, first semester stuff.

Repetition doesn't turn a stupid argument smart. I learned that in primary school.

Begging the question isn't an argument. Its a statement of unsupported opinion. Thus, what is there to refute?

I gave you that list. You can add internet scat porn masturbator to the list too. Almost forgot that one.

Red herring. The only list you're demonstrating now is logical fallacies.

Is there anything else? If red herrings are the extent of your argument, you're done.

Yes there is. Glad you asked. Metrosexual transgender freaks. Add that to the list too.