Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
You misunderstand, I know the answer, it is:And you are trying to find the answers to your quest here?
'It's okay when we do it.'
I just don't understand how people can be so lacking in self awareness.
You misunderstand, I know the answer, it is:And you are trying to find the answers to your quest here?
'It's okay when we do it.'
I just don't understand how people can be so lacking in self awareness.
So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?I'm rather amused at the outrage soaking a dude in petrol and setting him afire causes while burning people to death with WP or napalm gets no comment at all. Can't quite see the difference myself though I'm told there is one.
One thing is certain, Mindful will not explain it.
Why, has it been burning people alive with napalm and WP?
So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?I'm rather amused at the outrage soaking a dude in petrol and setting him afire causes while burning people to death with WP or napalm gets no comment at all. Can't quite see the difference myself though I'm told there is one.
One thing is certain, Mindful will not explain it.
Burning people alive is either moral or immoral or amoral. Mindful mentioned something about 'equivalence' but has been rather silent on the matter.
Burning people alive is either moral or immoral or amoral. Mindful mentioned something about 'equivalence' but has been rather silent on the matter.
So it's still about me?
Why are so bothered about what I think?
They should have cut her f***ing head off with a dull knife, the way the muslims do.
Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
You are the one who mentioned 'moral equivalence'. That's what there is to explain, why one burning alive is more moral than the other.
Was Jordan's response moral?
Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
Ah, terror.The action of Jordan is mitigated by the fact that it
is meant to deter the filth of Isis
You made the moral comparison, didn't you?Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
No, unless they are somehow able to get that off in self defense. In this case, the savages had an unarmed man in a cage, clothes covered with a flammable substance, and set him afire. They are beasts, that deserve their own painful deaths.Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
Haven't a clue. Is anyone ever justified in burning someone to death?So, you think the terrorists were justified in burning him to death?
So burning to death is justifiable. Well, say no more.I do not believe that execution by burning is ever justified---
accidental burning or incidental as a result of war----is tragic but
not criminal
So burning to death is justifiable. Well, say no more.I do not believe that execution by burning is ever justified---
accidental burning or incidental as a result of war----is tragic but
not criminal
You're telling the story.You made the moral comparison, didn't you?