Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minu

[Bush92]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

True, but Snopes had already debunked it.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Liberal buttstain snopes?

This is Snopes:

Is the cat telling the pussy what to say next?

 

[Penelope]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

Not buying!
Lock her up! Is the only thing I will accept!

Hate, prejudice and being dead wrong is what you accept.

We won the election and I want that whore in prison!

Ha Ha, DT was laughing while feeding you Trumpers. He said a lot of things, still waiting on his tax returns and what he found out in HI, about Obama's birth cert. You have been taken.

 

[TroglocratsRdumb]

Riiiiiiight, the Russians like Hillary so much that they decided to just give the "Clinton Charity" $145 million. LMAO

http://nypost.com/2015/04/26/charity-watchdog-clinton-foundation-a-slush-fund/

 

[Crixus]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

Oh, so it's ridiculous like the collusion that you libtards swear are there. You libtards don't get it do you?

 

[Crixus]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

Not buying!
Lock her up! Is the only thing I will accept!

Hate, prejudice and being dead wrong is what you accept.

We won the election and I want that whore in prison!

Ha Ha, DT was laughing while feeding you Trumpers. He said a lot of things, still waiting on his tax returns and what he found out in HI, about Obama's birth cert. You have been taken.

This one was one of those caught whaling and crying on TV on election night.

 

[Penelope]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

Not buying!
Lock her up! Is the only thing I will accept!

Hate, prejudice and being dead wrong is what you accept.

We won the election and I want that whore in prison!

Ha Ha, DT was laughing while feeding you Trumpers. He said a lot of things, still waiting on his tax returns and what he found out in HI, about Obama's birth cert. You have been taken.

This one was one of those caught whaling and crying on TV on election night.

No he said both many times.

 

[Political Junky]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

True, but Snopes had already debunked it.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

The highly respected Snopes. Lol.

Of course liars hate Snopes.

 

[Mac1958]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

 

[Rustic]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

True, but Snopes had already debunked it.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

Washington redskin
Snopes is a left wing shit organization, So other words fake news.

Stay out of the fucking fire water. LOL

 

[Rustic]

This one’s gonna be short and sweet. Joy Reid was on fire this morning. Behold the awesome power of fully operational journalism!

I wonder how many people will take 2 minutes to educate themselves.

Joy Reid dismantles GOP Uranium One propaganda in a little under two minutes

True, but Snopes had already debunked it.

FACT CHECK: Hillary Clinton Gave 20 Percent of United States' Uranium to Russia in Exchange for Clinton Foundation Donations?

The highly respected Snopes. Lol.

Of course liars hate Snopes.

Lol
Snopes is a left wing organization. Shit for brains

 

[aaronleland]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

I'm sure she is a partisan hack, but given the GOP's 30 year record of throwing shit at a wall and hoping anything... ANYTHING sticks...

 

[Mac1958]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

I'm sure she is a partisan hack, but given the GOP's 30 year record of throwing shit at a wall and hoping anything... ANYTHING sticks...

Sure.

None of it can be believed, none of it. That's where we are.
.

 

[Rustic]

Fact-Checking Snopes: Website's Political 'Fact-Checker' Is Just A Liberal Blogger

 

[midcan5]

Hillary Hatred is one of the most fascinating psychological aliments of modern America. It says more about the hater and it demonstrates how hate can be taught and propagated among the partisans and ideologues. It has lots of misogyny in it but even women hate Hillary Clinton with a visceral hatred. Ask them why and like the woman in the video they just do. They were taught and they followed. But why? And why so weak? We have a clown for president because of that hatred and because the electorate is too stupid to realize they are being bamboozled by the right wing elites.

See The Destruction of Hillary Clinton by Susan Bordo

The right is so stupid today as above they simply shoot the messenger.

.

 

[AntonToo]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

 

[Mac1958]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

I said "may be".

You completely missed the point.

Speaking of intellectual laziness.
.

 

[AntonToo]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

I said "may be".

You completely missed the point.

Speaking of intellectual laziness.
.

Your point is false. When someone is right, they are right, doesn't matter the bias.

This logical fallacy is called Appeal to motive - Wikipedia

 

[Mac1958]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

I said "may be".

You completely missed the point.

Speaking of intellectual laziness.
.

Your point is false. When someone is right, they are right, doesn't matter the bias.

The falsehood is reverse of appeal to authority.

A person can present facts without telling the whole story.

There can be contrary facts for which they are not looking, or that they are ignoring.

You know that, right?
.

 

[AntonToo]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

I said "may be".

You completely missed the point.

Speaking of intellectual laziness.
.

Your point is false. When someone is right, they are right, doesn't matter the bias.

The falsehood is reverse of appeal to authority.

A person can present facts without telling the whole story.

There can be contrary facts for which they are not looking, or that they are ignoring.

You know that, right?
.

Sure, but by not seeking out facts and making up your own mind you are being intellectually LAZY, which is what I was saying

 

[Mac1958]

Reid may be absolutely, 100% correct. She may have nailed it perfectly.

Unfortunately, I know that she is an absolute, 100% hardcore partisan, as partisan as they get.

So there's no way to know what contrary or potentially contrary information she left out, or what information she included that she may have in any way bent to her political agenda, so to me all she's doing is preaching to the choir. It's just more partisan noise. "Side" irrelevant.

It really is a shame, what has become of "journalism".
.

You are an intellectually lazy bum as usual.

If you think she is 100% correct then IT DOES NOT MATTER WHO SHE IS.

I said "may be".

You completely missed the point.

Speaking of intellectual laziness.
.

Your point is false. When someone is right, they are right, doesn't matter the bias.

The falsehood is reverse of appeal to authority.

A person can present facts without telling the whole story.

There can be contrary facts for which they are not looking, or that they are ignoring.

You know that, right?
.

Sure, but by not seeking out facts and making up your own mind you are being intellectually LAZY, which is what I was saying

My comment was on partisanship and the state of "journalism", not the particulars of the case.

I suspect most people got that. I'll try to make it even more clear next time, so that you're not so upset.
.