Judge advises jurors to never disclose they were on the jury.

[otto105]

All these trials have done is assure Trump will be the GOP nominee...waste millions of dollars and give you a woody. Other than that...they're a farce.

i can't change your impulse to back a liar, sexual abuser and grifter with 91 charges against him.

 

[BluesLegend]

Why, did Dems bribe the jurors to rule against Trump?

 

[otto105]

Why, did Dems bribe the jurors to rule against Trump?

Hilarious

The former fuckup has only himself to blame.

BTW he has to deposit money in escrow account in order to appeal decision by that jury.

 

[Rogue AI]

Thus do our kangaroo courts expand. Forget about an open and honest system. At least the enemies of the people are making themselves known.

 

[BluesLegend]

Hilarious

The former fuckup has only himself to blame.

BTW he has to deposit money in escrow account in order to appeal decision by that jury.

Meh, chump change. Trump flipped all you Dems the bird and got right back to re-taking the White House.

 

[otto105]

Thus do our kangaroo courts expand. Forget about an open and honest system. At least the enemies of the people are making themselves known.

WTF are you blathering about al.

Keeping an enemies list for what fuckup. You don't believe in honest courts as (like Democracy) it's too inconvenient for your fascist state.

 

[otto105]

Meh, chump change. Trump flipped all you Dems the bird and got right back to re-taking the White House.

I really going to love a second beat down of you fuckups.

 

[BluesLegend]

I really going to love a second beat down of you fuckups.

Dem fantasy land post. Dems are going to get what they got coming to them. That's how the world works. When you are a lowlife Dem scumbag, eventually you pay the price.

 

[otto105]

Dem fantasy land post. Dems are going to get what they got coming to them. That's how the world works. When you are a lowlife Dem scumbag, eventually you pay the price.

I really going to love the second beatdown of the fuckup.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

are you saying there has been more violence in the last 20yrs from the right ? the left committed more violence during the summer of 2020 than any political group in US History ! over 2 dozen murdered, billions in damage, and over 2000 cops injured .. those are facts you cant deny without losing all credibility .

“The attack against Paul Pelosi was horrific, but it was not an isolated event. In the last five years, political violence has skyrocketed on the right, and desire is growing on the left. The public’s willingness to support partisan violence in America now approaches levels recorded in Northern Ireland at the height of its troubles.”

Opinion | How Political Violence Went Mainstream on the Right

Hate-filled rhetoric rises during election season, and the outcome is obvious.

www.politico.com

The violent, lawless right remains an ongoing threat.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

lets see how peaceful the insane gender confused antisemites on the left are after Trump is elected in nov ! the leftists are going to lose their minuscule minds after the election ! their emotional faggotry will be at its highest level in history !

How embarrassing for you.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The judge doesn't want these anti Trumpers to be interviewed by the media so the world would find out what a sham this trial was.... The liar bitch will never see a dime....

What would you do if I gave you their names?

 

[Hutch Starskey]

Why would it be dangerous to reveal their identities?

What did they do wrong?

Be proud of doing your civic duty!

I get it, you may catch a .243 round in the throat in the walmart parking lot, but that would strictly be a coincidence. Don't hide like sniveling cowards.

Why would that be funny?
You literally just proved the point.

Are you all proud to be such predictable morons?

Would you be surprised when the sheriffs arrived?

 

[Arlette]

Sounds advice IMHO.

They could be in real danger if the MAGAts get ahold of their names.

Judge in Trump defamation trial advises jurors to 'never disclose that you were on this jury'

Judge Lewis Kaplan advised jurors to "never disclose" that they were on the Trump-Caroll defamation trial jury after the verdict had been read.

www.businessinsider.com

This is Trumpism in a nutshell

 

[frigidweirdo]

Sounds advice IMHO.

They could be in real danger if the MAGAts get ahold of their names.

Judge in Trump defamation trial advises jurors to 'never disclose that you were on this jury'

Judge Lewis Kaplan advised jurors to "never disclose" that they were on the Trump-Caroll defamation trial jury after the verdict had been read.

www.businessinsider.com

Welcome to freedom 2024 from the Trump side.

 

[konradv]

Or in danger if media asked them, "how did you determine that a woman with a modest career and means was worth $83M for a few mean words"? "Also, if you believe this is a nice value, what would someone in NY who was physically beaten by a cop or someone on the street be worth in a civil suit"?

The majority of the award wasn’t about the assault itself. Unless the cop went on the media and talked disparagingly about the victim, that example doesn’t apply.

 

[Mac1958]

Sounds advice IMHO.

They could be in real danger if the MAGAts get ahold of their names.

Yep. I'm glad he did that.

This thing is a weird mix of Mafia and pseudo-religious cult.

The mentorship he received from Roy Cohn really stuck.

 

[shockedcanadian]

The majority of the award wasn’t about the assault itself. Unless the cop went on the media and talked disparagingly about the victim, that example doesn’t apply.

Still doesn't explain $83M. There is nothing remotely related to the words and any perceived damage. How did his words cause $83M in damage to her "brand"? In fact, before her allegations against him, who even knew who she was? It could be argued fairly easily that SHE caused the damage to his brand if her allegations were false. We need sanity in the courts not radical, activist judges on either side.

 

[konradv]

Still doesn't explain $83M. There is nothing remotely related to the words and any perceived damage. How did his words cause $83M in damage to her "brand"? In fact, before her allegations against him, who even knew who she was? It could be argued fairly easily that SHE caused the damage to his brand if her allegations were false. We need sanity in the courts not radical, activist judges on either side.

They weren’t allegations. A jury said they were crimes.

 

[shockedcanadian]

They weren’t allegations. A jury said they were crimes.

Trump was also cleared of any rape against her, right? Therefore, is she a liar or not? If the courts didn't believe her, what does that make her?