Judge believes man who sodomized 3 yr old didn't intend to harm her. Reduces sentence.

many might be concerned with why your god allows sickness like this.....mercy i dont see it...
It's a very ancient question and a very valid one. The answer is that mankind cannot be given free will apart from the consequences of free will. But even the answer brings little solace to the Question Of Suffering.


There's always an excuse.

If "christians" like something, its a gift from their god and god answered their prayers. If they don't, its "god's will" and "god moves in mysterious ways".

The only logical conclusion when a child is harmed, born with deformities, becomes sick, etc, etc ... That is that "god" is a petulant child himself who takes a vile and ugly delight in causing terrible pain to the least among us.
 
So we censure a publishing of a scientific study? Huh? Its one study and what the experiment shows is what they publish. That's how science works.

But the ruling wasn't saying that he shouldn't be punished but rather that his constitutional rights were violated in this case. That's what this judge was ruling on and that's what we need our judges to do. Not to be emotional and to review the case and to see whether the person's constitutional rights were violated.

I am not in the case so I can't determine what the ruling was based on so I would have to read the opinion (which no news outlet ever linked to) to see what the standard of review was.
 
Okey dokey. I want to bazooka barf big time. It's a thought process like this Judge has that makes me want to believe the person is on drugs because surely no one could possibly believe that sodomizing a three year old and covering her mouth to keep her from screaming was just a sad accident of the perpetrator getting aroused at the wrong time and really meant no harm.

Thank heavens the state is appealing his ruling.

"A California judge has reduced a child rapist's mandatory 25-year sentence down to only 10 - saying anything longer would be 'cruel and unusual punishment'.

Superior Court Judge M. Marc Kelly told an Orange County jury that 20-year-old Kevin Jonas Rojano-Nieto 'did not intend to harm' the three-year-old girl he raped at his family home in June.

The judge said that he was sure that although Rojano-Nieto sodomized the girl and covered her mouth so she couldn't scream out, 'there was no violence or callous disregard for the victim's well-being'.

Good grief. Rest of sickening story at link.

Judge M. Marc Kelly REDUCES prison sentence of man who raped 3-year-old Daily Mail Online

How disgusting. Thank you for bringing this case up.

I believe that Judge is an elected position- and yes- I would campaign to have him ousted from the bench based upon this reasoning.

A life sentence would have been a reasonable sentence for this POS.
 

Not JUST in California...though there is where the "powers that be" are testing the waters...coming to a state near you. All law enforcement and medical establishments use the APA as a guide for what is correct in arresting and punishing sex offenders. The California judgment would be in keeping with the American Psychological Association's stance on child molestation ( a thing Congress voted unanimously to censure the APA for so doing)

In August of 1999, the United States Congress issued a joint resolution censuring the American Psychological Association, perhaps the first occasion in our country's history that our nation's highest legislative body actually censured a professional organization for the publication of scientific findings....

...The issue of child sexual abuse has become so polarized that it has become necessary, and almost reflexive if not de rigueur, for authors to state, as a prelude to any critical analysis of societal perceptions and reactions to such abuse, what should be obvious. Thus we state unequivocally that this reaction to the Congressional Censure should, in no way, be construed as an apology for sex offending behavior, or an attempt to deny or minimize the traumatic effects many children experience as a consequence of sexual abuse. It is also not an attempt to justify sexual contact between children and adults as ever being legitimate, even if immediate negative effects are not apparent..."
IPT Journal - Societal Myths about Sex Offending and Consequences for Prevention of Offending Behavior Against Children and Women

This was an article defending the APA and expressing anger at Congress for daring to say that the APA's conclusion in their paper "that some adult-child sex can be beneficial to the child" is wrong.

The author says of the victim-child "even if immediate negative effects are not apparent". DEFENDING CHILD SEX ABUSE! Courtesy of the American Psychological Association..
So we censure a publishing of a scientific study? Huh? Its one study and what the experiment shows is what they publish. That's how science works.

But the ruling wasn't saying that he shouldn't be punished but rather that his constitutional rights were violated in this case. That's what this judge was ruling on and that's what we need our judges to do. Not to be emotional and to review the case and to see whether the person's constitutional rights were violated.

I am not in the case so I can't determine what the ruling was based on so I would have to read the opinion (which no news outlet ever linked to) to see what the standard of review was.
maybe you should read it. Your opinion is based on sheer ignorance.
 

And people wonder why the LORD would call California Sodom and Gomorrah and declare His intention to destroy it. (see Dumitru Duduman story) Wonder no more. California is full of such vile abominations - it is only the mercy of God it hasn't already happened.

I would wonder when the LORD talked to you and told you that California is Sodom and Gomorrah.
 

And people wonder why the LORD would call California Sodom and Gomorrah and declare His intention to destroy it. (see Dumitru Duduman story) Wonder no more. California is full of such vile abominations - it is only the mercy of God it hasn't already happened.
When did the lord call California Sodom and Gomorrah? They have some religious nut cases out here too.
 

And people wonder why the LORD would call California Sodom and Gomorrah and declare His intention to destroy it. (see Dumitru Duduman story) Wonder no more. California is full of such vile abominations - it is only the mercy of God it hasn't already happened.

I would wonder when the LORD talked to you and told you that California is Sodom and Gomorrah.
When burning sulfur starts pelting major Californian cities you won't have to ask any longer. Heavens! I hope you don't live there.
 

And people wonder why the LORD would call California Sodom and Gomorrah and declare His intention to destroy it. (see Dumitru Duduman story) Wonder no more. California is full of such vile abominations - it is only the mercy of God it hasn't already happened.

I would wonder when the LORD talked to you and told you that California is Sodom and Gomorrah.
When burning sulfur starts pelting major Californian cities you won't have to ask any longer. Heavens! I hope you don't live there.
I live out here so I'm wondering when god threatened california and why is he taking such a long time carrying out his threats?
 

And people wonder why the LORD would call California Sodom and Gomorrah and declare His intention to destroy it. (see Dumitru Duduman story) Wonder no more. California is full of such vile abominations - it is only the mercy of God it hasn't already happened.

I would wonder when the LORD talked to you and told you that California is Sodom and Gomorrah.
When burning sulfur starts pelting major Californian cities you won't have to ask any longer. Heavens! I hope you don't live there.
I live out here so I'm wondering when god threatened california and why is he taking such a long time carrying out his threats?
There's still ten righteous men in the city. I heard one of them has had enough though and is getting ready to move out.
 
Are out of the closet or not?

Hic

3759360169_6720cfd40c.jpg


Editors note: It appears that Asslips isn't as black as he claims to be... SURPRISE!
 

Forum List

Back
Top