Judge denies Cohen's request to review records retained in search

[JimH52]

But at the end of the day, Cohen will be indicted and will decide whether to continue to hump trump or flip for his family.

trump must be very nervous....

Yes, for Cohen it will be a "test" of his loyalty to the Trumpster, mindful of TWO important additional factors:

First, Cohen is facing about 20 years of a prison term, and

Second, Cohen well knows that when it came to a post within the Trump administration in D.C., he wasn't even in the remote radar for consideration.

Ha! Maybe time Cohen got revenge on the trumpeter.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

But at the end of the day, Cohen will be indicted and will decide whether to continue to hump trump or flip for his family.

trump must be very nervous....

Yes, for Cohen it will be a "test" of his loyalty to the Trumpster, mindful of TWO important additional factors:

First, Cohen is facing about 20 years of a prison term, and

Second, Cohen well knows that when it came to a post within the Trump administration in D.C., he wasn't even in the remote radar for consideration.

Ha! Maybe time Cohen got revenge on the trumpeter.

Revenge for what?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Of all the judges in America, we get a Soros Puppet. Officiated his wedding? What?! Is this just an innocent coincidence, or are we witnessing a Soros-instigated Coup-attempt here in the US?

You sound insane.

 

[Dschrute3]

Of all the judges in America, we get a Soros Puppet. Officiated his wedding? What?! Is this just an innocent coincidence, or are we witnessing a Soros-instigated Coup-attempt here in the US?

You sound insane.

You don't find anything at all disturbing about a judge who officiated Soros' wedding, deciding these matters? Think about if it was a Koch brother judge, ruling against a Democrat President. Would you not find anything disturbing about that?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You don't find anything at all disturbing about a judge who officiated Soros' wedding, deciding these matters?

Of course not. What a silly question. Political donations are free speech. There is zero conflict of interest there, by any ratonnal standard. You are peddling fantasy.

 

[Dschrute3]

You don't find anything at all disturbing about a judge who officiated Soros' wedding, deciding these matters?

Of course not. What a silly question. Political donations are free speech. There is zero conflict of interest there, by any ratonnal standard. You are peddling fantasy.

WHAT?! So if it were a judge who officiated a Koch bother's wedding, and ruled against a Democrat President, you wouldn't have any problem with that? Come on, be real. This isn't right. She shouldn't have been allowed to rule on this. Period, end of story.