Judge Orders Christian to pay Homo for using “Inappropriate” Bible verse

[C_Clayton_Jones]

He was a street preacher and they are the worst. The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Hey dumb ass, the homo approached the preacher looking for a debate. You fail

Why dont you seek out and post the other side of the story?

Like.. you know, read the actual grievance.

she not interested in the facts just gay bashing..

True.

Which is the case of most others on the social right.

 

[TemplarKormac]

The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Sorry, there isn't one. When the story isn't portrayed the way you want, you always look for the part that suits your preference. What this is happens to be what is wrong with LGBT advocacy. They seek to make spectacles out of the opposition, rather than expending their efforts in more productive ways, say lobbying in Washington rather than ambushing street preachers.

People will soon get sick of this treachery, there will be those who fight back at this childish and immature behavior. I feel sorry for the good standing homosexuals who have people such as this, this... thug, among them.

 

[TemplarKormac]

How do you know, you got one side of the story.

Coming from someone who would rather see that there only be one side of the story.

 

[TemplarKormac]

He was a street preacher and they are the worst. The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Hey dumb ass, the homo approached the preacher looking for a debate. You fail

Why dont you seek out and post the other side of the story?

Like.. you know, read the actual grievance.

she not interested in the facts just gay bashing..

So, they can't bash gays, but others can bash Christians?

Do what now?

 

[TemplarKormac]

apparently this street preacher is someone who loves to preach to homos and tell them they are going to rot in hell. This should not be happening on street corners. that is what churches are for

Sorry, that's what the First Amendment is for. You can't just restrict religious speech to the confines of a Church. Why do such things even cross your mind?

 

[TemplarKormac]

The nice Mormon boys don't do that though.

Then why aren't you a Mormon?

If people want to listen to a sermon they can go to a church or a seminar or hey turn on TV, but two days ago there were several men walking around in my neighborhood knocking on doors, which needs to come to a stop.

Like I said just previously, the First Amendment allows people to preach anywhere, as long as they don't set one foot in your home, as long as they leave peacefully, their speech is protected. Imagine Billy Graham not being able to hold his crusades, all 417 of them throughout 185 countries, for simply being told to keep his faith confined to a church. You're quite the...er...bigot.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That might be allowed in Saudi Arabia.

They kill gay people in Saudi Arabia. No really, they do, yet, where is your outrage? They do more than what the street preacher did, they don't just yell "you are going to hell!" they kill homosexuals in the name of Islam. Where is your anger?

 

[TemplarKormac]

Leviticus 20 is soo easy to debate. The gay fellow should not had debated him if he did not know about the bible. All he had to do was refer to the New Testament. And if not that, use Leviticus 20 against the preacher because he convienantly left out a lot of the other parts. Dumb on the gay fellows part. Because if we did use Leviticus 20 as some type of law I am pretty sure at least 100 million Americans would be put to death....lol

I, as a Christian, would have sent the preacher to James 2:10 and schooled him on what Jesus taught.

So you would have labored to convince him that Jesus contradicted himself by teaching homosexuality was ok when in fact he taught it was an abomination on Mt. Sinai. Got it.

Did you read the Biblical reference? Because if you did, you wouldn't say that. Focusing solely on homosexuality is no more a complete presentation of the Gospel than is focusing solely on fornication.

And why are you so focused on Leviticus 20? Why are you so intent on cherrypicking the Bible? If you're so concerned what the Bible says about what Homosexuals do, the I suggest you heed it, read all of it.

Stop invoking the Bible only as a dishonest means of justifying this kind of behavior.

 

[TemplarKormac]

He was a street preacher and they are the worst. The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Hey dumb ass, the homo approached the preacher looking for a debate. You fail

Why dont you seek out and post the other side of the story?

Like.. you know, read the actual grievance.

she not interested in the facts just gay bashing..

True.

Which is the case of most others on the social right.

Are you interested in making any arguments? Why must it be that you insult more than you argue?

 

[Agit8r]

Other countries have fewer protections for speech than America does. Like with the UK, in this case, or Russia in the case of Pussy Riot.

 

[TemplarKormac]

 

[Agit8r]

That's fine and well, but the First Amendment only applies to United States jurisdiction.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That's fine and well, but the First Amendment only applies to United States jurisdiction

Your point?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

"Judge Orders Christian to pay Homo for using “Inappropriate” Bible verse"

“Homo”

In addition to being dishonest and a liar, the OP is also a bigot.

What a surprise.

 

[Agit8r]

That's fine and well, but the First Amendment only applies to United States jurisdiction

Your point?

The case at hand is from the UK

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

News flash: There is no 'First Amendment' in the UK.

 

[TemplarKormac]

That's fine and well, but the First Amendment only applies to United States jurisdiction

Your point?

The case at hand is from the UK

Given that our constitution was framed on the basis of British Law, your argument is invalid. Also, since Britain is governed under the Human Rights Convention, you should also read this:

Today freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional human rights law. The right is enshrined in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.[10] Based on John Milton's arguments, freedom of speech is understood as a multi-faceted right that includes not only the right to express, or disseminate, information and ideas, but three further distinct aspects:

1. the right to seek information and ideas;
2. the right to receive information and ideas;
3. the right to impart information and ideas

International, regional and national standards also recognize that freedom of speech, as the freedom of expression, includes any medium, be it orally, in written, in print, through the Internet or through art forms. This means that the protection of freedom of speech as a right includes not only the content, but also the means of expression.[10]

Freedom of speech - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

 

[Agit8r]

That's fine and well, but the First Amendment only applies to United States jurisdiction

Your point?

The case at hand is from the UK

Given that our constitution was framed on the basis of British Law, your argument is invalid. Also, since Britain is governed under the Human Rights Convention, you should also read this:

Today freedom of speech, or the freedom of expression, is recognized in international and regional human rights law. The right is enshrined in Article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights, Article 13 of the American Convention on Human Rights and Article 9 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights.[10] Based on John Milton's arguments, freedom of speech is understood as a multi-faceted right that includes not only the right to express, or disseminate, information and ideas, but three further distinct aspects:

1. the right to seek information and ideas;
2. the right to receive information and ideas;
3. the right to impart information and ideas

International, regional and national standards also recognize that freedom of speech, as the freedom of expression, includes any medium, be it orally, in written, in print, through the Internet or through art forms. This means that the protection of freedom of speech as a right includes not only the content, but also the means of expression.[10]

Freedom of speech - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia

It is indeed true that hate-speech laws are in conflict with the Universal Declaration of Human Rights:

"Everyone has the right to freedom of opinion and expression; this right includes freedom to hold opinions without interference and to seek, receive and impart information and ideas through any media and regardless of frontiers."

However, the UN doesn't have any real teeth...

 

[TemplarKormac]

However, the UN doesn't have any real teeth...

Oh the irony. Obama seems to want to go to them a lot, especially regarding Iran. It seems as if to me the UN has more teeth than Congress.

Imagine that.

 

[daws101]

He was a street preacher and they are the worst. The Homo as you called him probably got sick of being told what a sinner he was and approached him, I'd like to see the other side of the story.

Hey dumb ass, the homo approached the preacher looking for a debate. You fail

Why dont you seek out and post the other side of the story?

Like.. you know, read the actual grievance.

she not interested in the facts just gay bashing..

So, they can't bash gays, but others can bash Christians?

Do what now?

nobody is bashing Christians however they are rightfully bashing faux Christians ,like yourself.