- Mar 23, 2010
- 31,945
- 8,953
I think the basis of the appeal will include bias of the judge, no one was harmed, denying Trump his right to run his business for 3 years is excessive, and the judge assumed that granting the loans was completely based on Trump's over valuation of collateral and his good credit and timely payments of his loans were not considered.At the moment nobody even knows he'll be able to come up with the cash to even get to appeal. But let's suppose he does. I've read the judgement. Something I'm sure you haven't.
It's detailed, goes over all the witnesses, what they testified to. How credible they were or weren't. That stuff isn't appealable.
What is left is the amount of damages and how the law is applied. The judgement lays out in great detail how the amount of damages was calculated and he's a judge applying a pretty common and broad anti-corruption law in New York.
I don't know what the basis for an appeal would even be or if he has the money to get to an appeal within 30 days.
I suspect he'll be able to come up with the cash. I highly doubt he'll get anywhere on appeal.
I think the last claim has the most merit and may persuade the judges to reduce the financial penalty. I think the rest of the judge's order will stand.