Judge sets absurd trial date for Trump case

Six months plus change is MORE than enough time to prepare... no point in dragging this out any longer than necessary... it's time to party...

Prosecution had 2 1/2 years to prepare. Why do you claim six month is "enough time" for the defense?
 
Prosecution had 2 1/2 years to prepare. Why do you claim six month is "enough time" for the defense?
They didn't have 2-1/2 years to prepare.

They had 2-1/2 years to go digging-around to accumulate the evidence that they, in turn, used to prepare.

I seriously doubt that actual preparation time lasted more than a handful of months, and your boy now has six to answer the charges.

Your boy is not going to be allowed to run-out the clock on this stuff.. so go ahead and whine and cry and pi$$ and moan... won't do any good.
 
This prosecution of Donald Trump is a disgrace to America.

There's nothing disgraceful about due process.

And as your ilk's absolute refusal to discuss the evidence against Trump demonstrates elegently, you already know that the evidence utterly justified the charges.

The NY felonies rather than misdemeanors is going to be a tougher case. But the classified doc, obstruction and fraud cases? Oh, Trump is in real trouble. Which is why y'all refuse to discuss the evidence of each like they were on fire.
 
What happen to a free and fair election and what the people want?

And states have the right to adhere to the Constitution, which states...

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
 

It is unlikely in the extreme that a massive trial of this magnitude (Constitutionally, politically, historically and legally) will be “ready” for trial that soon. But the judge’s very biased agenda is crystal clear. And it’s unacceptable.

(Since this trial is far more about politics than justice, I chose the politics forum).
This is not a complicated court case.

One, Trump is being charged alone... not with co conspirators which makes it much much easier with fewer defendants and all of their lawyer motions.

Two, it doesn't involve top secret classified documents and a lawyer clearance ....for all other defendants too, and SCIF viewing ONLY kind of things like in the Mara Lago case.

The Georgia case has 19 defendants and it could take a few years to work through all of them

The N.Y. State Case in March should be pushed out because it is not nearly as important as the 2020 election subversion by Trump trial.
 
I wonder what that ^ post would have meant if you had any ability to even think.

I wonder what you would post if you weren't desperately ignoring all the evidence against Trump?

Laughing......no wonder your legal 'predictions' are so consistently wrong.
 
And states have the right to adhere to the Constitution, which states...

No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any state, who, having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any state legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any state, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by a vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disability.
Try it find out how those states will be dealt with
 
There's nothing disgraceful about due process.

And as your ilk's absolute refusal to discuss the evidence against Trump demonstrates elegently, you already know that the evidence utterly justified the charges.

The NY felonies rather than misdemeanors is going to be a tougher case. But the classified doc, obstruction and fraud cases? Oh, Trump is in real trouble. Which is why y'all refuse to discuss the evidence of each like they were on fire.
Only one conviction can send Trump up for life which is why he & his asslickers are soiling themselves on a daily basis.

They adore the guy who could fuck up a one car funeral.
 
They didn't have 2-1/2 years to prepare.

They had 2-1/2 years to go digging-around to accumulate the evidence that they, in turn, used to prepare.
Uh, gathering evidence is preparation.
I seriously doubt that actual preparation time lasted more than a handful of months, and your boy now has six to answer the charges.

Your boy is not going to be allowed to run-out the clock on this stuff.. so go ahead and whine and cry and pi$$ and moan... won't do any good.
Fuck Due Process huh? Why not just ditch the trial and hang him now.

You guys should not pretend to understand the law or the process, you just embarrass yourselves
 
This is not a complicated court case.

One, Trump is being charged alone... not with co conspirators which makes it much much easier with fewer defendants and all of their lawyer motions.

Two, it doesn't involve top secret classified documents and a lawyer clearance ....for all other defendants too, and SCIF viewing ONLY kind of things like in the Mara Lago case.

The Georgia case has 19 defendants and it could take a few years to work through all of them

The N.Y. State Case in March should be pushed out because it is not nearly as important as the 2020 election subversion by Trump trial.
Federal cases take priority, generally, due to the Supremacy Clause.

All the cases are bullahit.

But it takes time to prepare when the regime comes gunning for your client. And with all due respect, the issue has nothing whatsoever to do with whether you imagine that the case is or is not complicated.
 

Forum List

Back
Top